someone looks retarded yes. lol
Forum > North American Pro League > USA Conference > 1 agent with 2 or more players on dif teams in same league
hud
offline
offline
Originally posted by Oso
ahh thats a reason
but now wouldnt it be prudent to break them up in to dif leagues or the same team?
that would considered gutting or colusion by some and cause an uproar.
The fact is, to compete in the USA pro you needed lots of boosting day 0 created players in the first season, so we joined other teams and made players.
I agree with Florida though, why post it here. How does it affect you?
ahh thats a reason
but now wouldnt it be prudent to break them up in to dif leagues or the same team?that would considered gutting or colusion by some and cause an uproar.
The fact is, to compete in the USA pro you needed lots of boosting day 0 created players in the first season, so we joined other teams and made players.
I agree with Florida though, why post it here. How does it affect you?
D-will
offline
offline
actually i had six players on four different teams but now i only have three teams in the pro im playing for but its all cool
Oso
offline
offline
Originally posted by hud
Originally posted by Oso
ahh thats a reason but now wouldnt it be prudent to break them up in to dif leagues or the same team?
that would considered gutting or colusion by some and cause an uproar.
The fact is, to compete in the USA pro you needed lots of boosting day 0 created players in the first season, so we joined other teams and made players.
I agree with Florida though, why post it here. How does it affect you?
sure i could see where some would have that thought, just as i have the thought that having more than 1 player in 2 or more teams in the same league sounds like collusion.
Why doesnt it effect me? I have players in the USA. I dont have the right to voice an opinion on the continent I play in?
Interesting to know that when my team makes it to the pro's that there is a good'old boy network in place. Playing against 4-5 teams colluding will be hard and challenging.
Originally posted by Oso
ahh thats a reason
but now wouldnt it be prudent to break them up in to dif leagues or the same team?that would considered gutting or colusion by some and cause an uproar.
The fact is, to compete in the USA pro you needed lots of boosting day 0 created players in the first season, so we joined other teams and made players.
I agree with Florida though, why post it here. How does it affect you?
sure i could see where some would have that thought, just as i have the thought that having more than 1 player in 2 or more teams in the same league sounds like collusion.
Why doesnt it effect me? I have players in the USA. I dont have the right to voice an opinion on the continent I play in?
Interesting to know that when my team makes it to the pro's that there is a good'old boy network in place. Playing against 4-5 teams colluding will be hard and challenging.
Last edited May 17, 2008 16:23:47
cane__boy
offline
offline
basically its not cheating unless you do something wrong
they have done nothing wrong so they are not cheating
they have done nothing wrong so they are not cheating
Serenity
offline
offline
Originally posted by Oso
Originally posted by hud
Originally posted by Oso
ahh thats a reason but now wouldnt it be prudent to break them up in to dif leagues or the same team?
that would considered gutting or colusion by some and cause an uproar.
The fact is, to compete in the USA pro you needed lots of boosting day 0 created players in the first season, so we joined other teams and made players.
I agree with Florida though, why post it here. How does it affect you?
sure i could see where some would have that thought, just as i have the thought that having more than 1 player in 2 or more teams in the same league sounds like collusion.
Why doesnt it effect me? I have players in the USA. I dont have the right to voice an opinion on the continent I play in?
Interesting to know that when my team makes it to the pro's that there is a good'old boy network in place. Playing against 4-5 teams colluding will be hard and challenging.
Collusion
1. a secret agreement, esp. for fraudulent or treacherous purposes; conspiracy: Some of his employees were acting in collusion to rob him.
2. Law. a secret understanding between two or more persons to gain something illegally, to defraud another of his or her rights, or to appear as adversaries though in agreement: collusion of husband and wife to obtain a divorce.
How does having player on multiple teams fall under that?
Originally posted by hud
Originally posted by Oso
ahh thats a reason
but now wouldnt it be prudent to break them up in to dif leagues or the same team?that would considered gutting or colusion by some and cause an uproar.
The fact is, to compete in the USA pro you needed lots of boosting day 0 created players in the first season, so we joined other teams and made players.
I agree with Florida though, why post it here. How does it affect you?
sure i could see where some would have that thought, just as i have the thought that having more than 1 player in 2 or more teams in the same league sounds like collusion.
Why doesnt it effect me? I have players in the USA. I dont have the right to voice an opinion on the continent I play in?
Interesting to know that when my team makes it to the pro's that there is a good'old boy network in place. Playing against 4-5 teams colluding will be hard and challenging.
Collusion
1. a secret agreement, esp. for fraudulent or treacherous purposes; conspiracy: Some of his employees were acting in collusion to rob him.
2. Law. a secret understanding between two or more persons to gain something illegally, to defraud another of his or her rights, or to appear as adversaries though in agreement: collusion of husband and wife to obtain a divorce.
How does having player on multiple teams fall under that?
Oso
offline
offline
sure I see that, wasnt a question about cheating though. Hell one player could tell a buddy on one of his other teams, everyone's skills and game plans and it wouldnt be cheating. Collusion yes cheating no.
Like i said, was just interested in ur thoughts on the subject.
Like i said, was just interested in ur thoughts on the subject.
Oso
offline
offline
um #1....A secret agreement for treacherous purposes.....If you cant see how this "could" be a problem having an agent with 4 dif players on 4 dif teams that each play everyone else and each other, i cant make you see it.
McGrai37
offline
offline
It could only affect the teams that have these players, and I'm sure they're aware of it. If they're not worried, why should anyone else be? This gives them no competitive advantage over other teams.
D-will
offline
offline
i dont see it....well most ppl in this community of players would be to good of a person to do that and just to make sure they dont like steal the tactics just lock them out...but most of us are friends on there and would never do that
Florida__boi08
offline
offline
Most of these players are oned by moderators. i am shure if bor trust them enough to make them mod. then we can trust them
Oso
offline
offline
Originally posted by McGrai37
It could only affect the teams that have these players, and I'm sure they're aware of it. If they're not worried, why should anyone else be? This gives them no competitive advantage over other teams.
sure it does, I only mentioned 1 example that would be bad, how about those same 4 teams working together exchanging ideas to keep the weaker teams with no extra cross references at the bottom of the ladder?
I would love to see the exact game plan the last team used for my next game with the same team.
It could only affect the teams that have these players, and I'm sure they're aware of it. If they're not worried, why should anyone else be? This gives them no competitive advantage over other teams.
sure it does, I only mentioned 1 example that would be bad, how about those same 4 teams working together exchanging ideas to keep the weaker teams with no extra cross references at the bottom of the ladder?
I would love to see the exact game plan the last team used for my next game with the same team.
Oso
offline
offline
Originally posted by Florida__boi08
Most of these players are oned by moderators. i am shure if bor trust them enough to make them mod. then we can trust them
I would tend to agree with you there BOI! that was until a mod questioned my right to post in a forum I belong in.
Most of these players are oned by moderators. i am shure if bor trust them enough to make them mod. then we can trust them
I would tend to agree with you there BOI! that was until a mod questioned my right to post in a forum I belong in.
McGrai37
offline
offline
Originally posted by Oso
Originally posted by McGrai37
It could only affect the teams that have these players, and I'm sure they're aware of it. If they're not worried, why should anyone else be? This gives them no competitive advantage over other teams.
sure it does, I only mentioned 1 example that would be bad, how about those same 4 teams working together exchanging ideas to keep the weaker teams with no extra cross references at the bottom of the ladder?
I would love to see the exact game plan the last team used for my next game with the same team.
Ok, so first they were using this to provide an advantage for their chosen team, and now they're using it to help out other teams? Troll on.
Originally posted by McGrai37
It could only affect the teams that have these players, and I'm sure they're aware of it. If they're not worried, why should anyone else be? This gives them no competitive advantage over other teams.
sure it does, I only mentioned 1 example that would be bad, how about those same 4 teams working together exchanging ideas to keep the weaker teams with no extra cross references at the bottom of the ladder?
I would love to see the exact game plan the last team used for my next game with the same team.
Ok, so first they were using this to provide an advantage for their chosen team, and now they're using it to help out other teams? Troll on.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
