30 points is probably like 3% at most. No one knows exactly for sure, except for Bort and DD. But it's probably minimal.
xnahog
offline
offline
Originally posted by j0shle0
Originally posted by xnahog
a 30 point difference in chemistry is a 9% advantage for one team.
where is the formula for that?
From an admin in a PM when I asked him the hit in chemistry.
Originally posted by xnahog
a 30 point difference in chemistry is a 9% advantage for one team.
where is the formula for that?
From an admin in a PM when I asked him the hit in chemistry.
archer255
offline
offline
All things considered if even a 5% advantage in chemistry were given to one team, and tactics had both teams evenly matched, the 5% could mean the difference in scoring or getting stopped near the goal line. Thats if everything but the chemistry were the exact same.
There are enough teams that are so close in tactics and players even a 3% difference due to chemistry really could push a game in favor of the team with greater chemistry.
Porky, I took a look at that game again and the chemistry gave Maryland about 25 points. The largest factor, other than chemistry, would have been the fact the QB we had starting wasn't that good. So in this case your most likely correct.
There are enough teams that are so close in tactics and players even a 3% difference due to chemistry really could push a game in favor of the team with greater chemistry.
Porky, I took a look at that game again and the chemistry gave Maryland about 25 points. The largest factor, other than chemistry, would have been the fact the QB we had starting wasn't that good. So in this case your most likely correct.
Last edited May 23, 2008 02:03:28
porky
offline
offline
I'm right? Wow I guess even a blind squirrel finds a nut ever now and then. I am never right. 
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
