Warrior General Games

This thread makes it clear that the East, as a conference, has no depth.

loleast

Updated standings

5. Gamblers, 10-5. ***O***

6. ***O***, 9-6. Gamblers

7. CCCC, 9-6. Beat Rage, they end up at 10-6.

8. Hammer, 9-6. Maulers

9. Woodys, 8-7. Philly, they end at 9-7.

10. Bullets, 8-7. DDL


Predictions:
Maulers beat Hammer
***O*** beats Gamblers
DDL beat Bullets

5. ***O***, 10-6, wins over Gamblers, CCCC
6. Gamblers, 10-6, win over CCCC
7. CCCC, 10-6
8. Woodys hold tiebreak over Hammer if just they are at 9-7.

10-6 gets you in.
I see the following combos of 9-7 teams

***O***, Woodys - ***O*** gets in
***O***, Woodys, Bullets - ***O*** gets in
***O***, Woodys, Bullets, Hammer - ***O*** and Hammer are 2-1 in the group and are in, others are 1-2
***O***, Woodys, Hammer - ***O*** on total points, then Woodys via tiebreaker
Woodys, Hammer - Woodys via tiebreaker
Woodys, Hammer, Bullets - Bullets look like they have enough total points lead to take it

doesn't matter... all of the best teams are in the west.

I think the following is true:

Gamblers are in
***O*** is in
CCCC is in with a win (maybe with a loss, haven't worked their's out)

Last spot breaks down like this:
Hammer is in with a win OR a loss AND ***O*** loss AND Bullets win
Woodys are in with a win AND Hammer loss AND Bullets loss
Bullets are in with a win AND Hammer loss AND ***O*** win

Originally posted by The Duff Man
I think the following is true:

Gamblers are in
***O*** is in
CCCC is in with a win (maybe with a loss, haven't worked their's out)

Last spot breaks down like this:
Hammer is in with a win OR a loss AND ***O*** loss AND Bullets win
Woodys are in with a win AND Hammer loss AND Bullets loss
Bullets are in with a win AND Hammer loss AND ***O*** win



So we have to win and you have to lose for us to get in? Or even if we lose, if you lose we are in?

Originally posted by Hukton Vioxx
Originally posted by The Duff Man

I think the following is true:

Gamblers are in
***O*** is in
CCCC is in with a win (maybe with a loss, haven't worked their's out)

Last spot breaks down like this:
Hammer is in with a win OR a loss AND ***O*** loss AND Bullets win
Woodys are in with a win AND Hammer loss AND Bullets loss
Bullets are in with a win AND Hammer loss AND ***O*** win



So we have to win and you have to lose for us to get in? Or even if we lose, if you lose we are in?

Going to be a crappy playoff anyway unless people agree not to use the run exploit logic.

/moar tears

Originally posted by islander1
Originally posted by Hukton Vioxx

Originally posted by The Duff Man


I think the following is true:

Gamblers are in
***O*** is in
CCCC is in with a win (maybe with a loss, haven't worked their's out)

Last spot breaks down like this:
Hammer is in with a win OR a loss AND ***O*** loss AND Bullets win
Woodys are in with a win AND Hammer loss AND Bullets loss
Bullets are in with a win AND Hammer loss AND ***O*** win



So we have to win and you have to lose for us to get in? Or even if we lose, if you lose we are in?

Going to be a crappy playoff anyway unless people agree not to use the run exploit logic.

/moar hypocritical tears




fyp

considering they did the same to beat DDL

Originally posted by Hukton Vioxx
Originally posted by The Duff Man

I think the following is true:

Gamblers are in
***O*** is in
CCCC is in with a win (maybe with a loss, haven't worked their's out)

Last spot breaks down like this:
Hammer is in with a win OR a loss AND ***O*** loss AND Bullets win
Woodys are in with a win AND Hammer loss AND Bullets loss
Bullets are in with a win AND Hammer loss AND ***O*** win



So we have to win and you have to lose for us to get in? Or even if we lose, if you lose we are in?



Win and you are in.

Lose and you need to generate the four way tie, since you lose any of the three way ties. You would need ***O*** to lose AND Bullets to win. Hammer and ***O*** would be 2-1 in the group of four teams. Hammer would get the 7 spot, ***O*** the 8th.

Originally posted by kr0n

considering they did the same to beat DDL

It's an exploit when somebody runs a lot on him, but when he runs a lot, it's an issue of "I need to fix my run d".

Originally posted by The Strategy Expert
Originally posted by kr0n


considering they did the same to beat DDL

It's an exploit when somebody runs a lot on him, but when he runs a lot, it's an issue of "I need to fix my run d".

Didn't your team just get spanked by OTR? Why are you even in this conversation?

Originally posted by Tijuana Glove
Originally posted by The Strategy Expert

Originally posted by kr0n



considering they did the same to beat DDL

It's an exploit when somebody runs a lot on him, but when he runs a lot, it's an issue of "I need to fix my run d".

Didn't your team just get spanked by OTR? Why are you even in this conversation?

He just won't accept that his run defense stinks and that fact gives him little room to complain about exploits of it.

Originally posted by Tijuana Glove


Didn't your team just get spanked by OTR?

Yes, what about it? What does that have to do with the topic?

Originally posted by Hukton Vioxx


He just won't accept that his run defense stinks and that fact gives him little room to complain about exploits of it.
LOL, you keep saying that and proving yourself wrong. I've already accepted that our run defense stinks. I don't deny it.

Originally posted by The Strategy Expert
Originally posted by Hukton Vioxx



He just won't accept that his run defense stinks and that fact gives him little room to complain about exploits of it.
LOL, you keep saying that and proving yourself wrong. I've already accepted that our run defense stinks. I don't deny it.


Sorry about being an ass about it, but I really do mean what I say...the yards/carry you are giving up makes it hard to believe anyone is exploiting something other than your defense. Strangely, we are on the same side of this now...