Updated to add Capital
Underdawg08
offline
offline
funny season. Cali can't even beat 8-mile.
The luck ran out.
The luck ran out.
Last edited Feb 8, 2009 19:56:01
trojans4me
offline
offline
Originally posted by UnderDogs
funny season. Cali can't even beat 8-mile.
The luck ran out.
Luck? It was pure skill. Still can't get over losing to us twice eh?
funny season. Cali can't even beat 8-mile.
The luck ran out.
Luck? It was pure skill. Still can't get over losing to us twice eh?
LSU
offline
offline
Originally posted by UnderDogs
funny season. Cali can't even beat 8-mile.
The luck ran out.
I agree.
Very funny.
A person who will not be named cries about his team being underrated.
The same person cries, and makes excuses as to why his team lost to California.
This same person, again, calls another team lucky - When his team needed luck to beat the Western Champions (Which was their only good win, by the way).
Then the person, talks the talk... Yet again... Can't walk the walk, as he loses to California again.
Then when California loses to the best team in the league... He comes in and makes fun of them.
Pretty much sum up the season?
Yeah, California can't beat 8-Mile.
But Canton can't beat California...
I can live with the first one.
And laugh at the second one.
funny season. Cali can't even beat 8-mile.
The luck ran out.
I agree.
Very funny.
A person who will not be named cries about his team being underrated.
The same person cries, and makes excuses as to why his team lost to California.
This same person, again, calls another team lucky - When his team needed luck to beat the Western Champions (Which was their only good win, by the way).
Then the person, talks the talk... Yet again... Can't walk the walk, as he loses to California again.
Then when California loses to the best team in the league... He comes in and makes fun of them.
Pretty much sum up the season?
Yeah, California can't beat 8-Mile.
But Canton can't beat California...
I can live with the first one.
And laugh at the second one.
Diamonddog
offline
offline
Lets go to the videotape LSU, and you will know why I said what I said...
Try more like, 9th in the West in PR TDs.
And it's the AVERAGE that matters. Not so much how many yards you get. The yards you get are more of a testament to the defense - Because that's affected by the amount of punts you receive - Which is caused by the D... Not by you.
What your player controls is his average... Which... You are #21 in KR, and #16 in PRs (2 CPUs ahead of you).
You have the most returns in punting... BUT THATS NOT ON YOU. THATS ON YOUR DEFENSE. You have guys who have had 24 and 25 less returns than you, who have more yards...
Yardage means crap. You're not the reason why you start at the opponents 48. Credit that to your stingy defense. (I mean... Come on... A guy with 80 less returns only has 250 less yards).
No offense - But you wouldn't even be in the top 5, maybe not even in the top 10, return men in the league...
You're not bad...
But you are certainly not even close to the level of Jack or Gordonson, or anyone else that's really in contention for that matter.
And to even come in here, and say anything about your player... You obviously don't know what to look for.
Would be like me saying "I would nominate Guess Who... Just because his stats aren't as good doesn't mean he isn't as good... Maybe it just means he's shut down his man more often." Gimme a break.
and now you know
Try more like, 9th in the West in PR TDs.
And it's the AVERAGE that matters. Not so much how many yards you get. The yards you get are more of a testament to the defense - Because that's affected by the amount of punts you receive - Which is caused by the D... Not by you.
What your player controls is his average... Which... You are #21 in KR, and #16 in PRs (2 CPUs ahead of you).
You have the most returns in punting... BUT THATS NOT ON YOU. THATS ON YOUR DEFENSE. You have guys who have had 24 and 25 less returns than you, who have more yards...
Yardage means crap. You're not the reason why you start at the opponents 48. Credit that to your stingy defense. (I mean... Come on... A guy with 80 less returns only has 250 less yards).
No offense - But you wouldn't even be in the top 5, maybe not even in the top 10, return men in the league...
You're not bad...
But you are certainly not even close to the level of Jack or Gordonson, or anyone else that's really in contention for that matter.
And to even come in here, and say anything about your player... You obviously don't know what to look for.
Would be like me saying "I would nominate Guess Who... Just because his stats aren't as good doesn't mean he isn't as good... Maybe it just means he's shut down his man more often." Gimme a break.
and now you know
Last edited Feb 8, 2009 20:51:53
LSU
offline
offline
Originally posted by Diamonddog
Lets go to the videotape LSU, and you will know why I said what I said...
Try more like, 9th in the West in PR TDs.
And it's the AVERAGE that matters. Not so much how many yards you get. The yards you get are more of a testament to the defense - Because that's affected by the amount of punts you receive - Which is caused by the D... Not by you.
What your player controls is his average... Which... You are #21 in KR, and #16 in PRs (2 CPUs ahead of you).
You have the most returns in punting... BUT THATS NOT ON YOU. THATS ON YOUR DEFENSE. You have guys who have had 24 and 25 less returns than you, who have more yards...
Yardage means crap. You're not the reason why you start at the opponents 48. Credit that to your stingy defense. (I mean... Come on... A guy with 80 less returns only has 250 less yards).
No offense - But you wouldn't even be in the top 5, maybe not even in the top 10, return men in the league...
You're not bad...
But you are certainly not even close to the level of Jack or Gordonson, or anyone else that's really in contention for that matter.
And to even come in here, and say anything about your player... You obviously don't know what to look for.
Would be like me saying "I would nominate Guess Who... Just because his stats aren't as good doesn't mean he isn't as good... Maybe it just means he's shut down his man more often." Gimme a break.
and now you know
First off, that's called a transcript. Not a videotape, maybe you need to learn some vocabulary?
Secondly, I don't understand what you're trying to say. Maybe your comprehension level is that of my 3rd grade sister.
I was responding to a guy who was doing the "Let's nominate my player, by saying I am not going to nominate my player" act.
Not sure how it is relevant at all, because all I am doing here is an organized MVP vote... Where the OWNERS, not the agents, nominate two players from their team to enter it.
I didn't pull any act, say anything about Cannon, or any of my other players (Nor was I nominating Who [Nor throwing his name into discussion] in the Pro Bowl topic) in this topic. So what you posted... Completely irrelevant. Nice try though.
Hell, I am still trying to figure out what you were trying to say, and what you are saying now. Because to be honest, you're making about as much sense as Hellen Keller performing open-heart surgery would.
Not sure what is so hard to get out of that.
Unless you're just stupid, which I'm starting to wonder if Forrest Gump is/was your tutor for school.
Lets go to the videotape LSU, and you will know why I said what I said...
Try more like, 9th in the West in PR TDs.
And it's the AVERAGE that matters. Not so much how many yards you get. The yards you get are more of a testament to the defense - Because that's affected by the amount of punts you receive - Which is caused by the D... Not by you.
What your player controls is his average... Which... You are #21 in KR, and #16 in PRs (2 CPUs ahead of you).
You have the most returns in punting... BUT THATS NOT ON YOU. THATS ON YOUR DEFENSE. You have guys who have had 24 and 25 less returns than you, who have more yards...
Yardage means crap. You're not the reason why you start at the opponents 48. Credit that to your stingy defense. (I mean... Come on... A guy with 80 less returns only has 250 less yards).
No offense - But you wouldn't even be in the top 5, maybe not even in the top 10, return men in the league...
You're not bad...
But you are certainly not even close to the level of Jack or Gordonson, or anyone else that's really in contention for that matter.
And to even come in here, and say anything about your player... You obviously don't know what to look for.
Would be like me saying "I would nominate Guess Who... Just because his stats aren't as good doesn't mean he isn't as good... Maybe it just means he's shut down his man more often." Gimme a break.
and now you know
First off, that's called a transcript. Not a videotape, maybe you need to learn some vocabulary?
Secondly, I don't understand what you're trying to say. Maybe your comprehension level is that of my 3rd grade sister.
I was responding to a guy who was doing the "Let's nominate my player, by saying I am not going to nominate my player" act.
Not sure how it is relevant at all, because all I am doing here is an organized MVP vote... Where the OWNERS, not the agents, nominate two players from their team to enter it.
I didn't pull any act, say anything about Cannon, or any of my other players (Nor was I nominating Who [Nor throwing his name into discussion] in the Pro Bowl topic) in this topic. So what you posted... Completely irrelevant. Nice try though.
Hell, I am still trying to figure out what you were trying to say, and what you are saying now. Because to be honest, you're making about as much sense as Hellen Keller performing open-heart surgery would.
Not sure what is so hard to get out of that.
Unless you're just stupid, which I'm starting to wonder if Forrest Gump is/was your tutor for school.
Last edited Feb 8, 2009 21:09:27
Diamonddog
offline
offline
It's pretty easy LSU.
If the players that you want to be recognized don't end up being MVP's, you will create a new thread.
It won't be MVP, it will be something else...
You didn't bother to vote for a single player for the all-star voting.
All you did was lobby against everyone else because they didn't agree with you.
So you started a new thread. with MVP voting.
just call whoever you want a "MVP"
I am sure that if whoever you want to be a MVP doesn't win, you will have a new thread...
Most misunderstood player, or best player to not win a trophy, or best player without the stats to prove it.
fine, you win, just appoint whoever you want to win whatever imaginary trophy you want.
If the players that you want to be recognized don't end up being MVP's, you will create a new thread.
It won't be MVP, it will be something else...
You didn't bother to vote for a single player for the all-star voting.
All you did was lobby against everyone else because they didn't agree with you.
So you started a new thread. with MVP voting.
just call whoever you want a "MVP"
I am sure that if whoever you want to be a MVP doesn't win, you will have a new thread...
Most misunderstood player, or best player to not win a trophy, or best player without the stats to prove it.
fine, you win, just appoint whoever you want to win whatever imaginary trophy you want.
LSU
offline
offline
Originally posted by Diamonddog
It's pretty easy LSU.
If the players that you want to be recognized don't end up being MVP's, you will create a new thread.
It won't be MVP, it will be something else...
You didn't bother to vote for a single player for the all-star voting.
All you did was lobby against everyone else because they didn't agree with you.
So you started a new thread. with MVP voting.
just call whoever you want a "MVP"
I am sure that if whoever you want to be a MVP doesn't win, you will have a new thread...
Most misunderstood player, or best player to not win a trophy, or best player without the stats to prove it.
fine, you win, just appoint whoever you want to win whatever imaginary trophy you want.
That makes no sense.
There's a difference between MVP, and Pro Bowl.
Pro Bowl is for the league's best players.
I didn't vote, because I refuse to lobby for any of my players... Which I haven't.
The MVP is for the best individual player... That has nothing to do with the Pro Bowl.
Plus, if you look at the Pro Bowl team lists... Probably all but one, or two of these guys are on that list...
Man, you are seriously an idiot.
Either your loopy as fuck (Drunk off of your feet, or just high... Or just getting it up the ass from UD right now, and trying to get your mind off of it), or your just plain dumb.
This is the OWNERS who chose their nominations.
If you don't realize that, you're dumb. The NFL has MVPs AND a Pro Bowl roster.
There is a difference.
Moron. Your failing, pretty epically. More epically than UD.
It's pretty easy LSU.
If the players that you want to be recognized don't end up being MVP's, you will create a new thread.
It won't be MVP, it will be something else...
You didn't bother to vote for a single player for the all-star voting.
All you did was lobby against everyone else because they didn't agree with you.
So you started a new thread. with MVP voting.
just call whoever you want a "MVP"
I am sure that if whoever you want to be a MVP doesn't win, you will have a new thread...
Most misunderstood player, or best player to not win a trophy, or best player without the stats to prove it.
fine, you win, just appoint whoever you want to win whatever imaginary trophy you want.
That makes no sense.
There's a difference between MVP, and Pro Bowl.
Pro Bowl is for the league's best players.
I didn't vote, because I refuse to lobby for any of my players... Which I haven't.
The MVP is for the best individual player... That has nothing to do with the Pro Bowl.
Plus, if you look at the Pro Bowl team lists... Probably all but one, or two of these guys are on that list...
Man, you are seriously an idiot.
Either your loopy as fuck (Drunk off of your feet, or just high... Or just getting it up the ass from UD right now, and trying to get your mind off of it), or your just plain dumb.
This is the OWNERS who chose their nominations.
If you don't realize that, you're dumb. The NFL has MVPs AND a Pro Bowl roster.
There is a difference.
Moron. Your failing, pretty epically. More epically than UD.
Last edited Feb 8, 2009 21:26:28
LSU
offline
offline
Just for kicks:
Offense:
Christian Ponder, QB - Tennessee PRO BOWL
Vinny Mormino, HB - 8 Mile PRO BOWL
Ricky Cannon, QB - California PRO BOWL
John Connor, WR - Nightmare PRO BOWL
Christy Joseph, TE - Sebring PRO BOWL
Swift Justus, RB - Capital PRO BOWL
Herman Blume, HB - Canton
Moose HeadLager, HB - Louisiana
Defense:
Preston "White Shoes" Bates, LB - Tennessee PRO BOWL
Demetrius Weezer, DE - 8 Mile PRO BOWL
Nacho Cheese, LB - California PRO BOWL
Mango Rinehardt, DE - Nightmare
Ian Joseph, LB - Sebring
R.A. Williams, CB - Capital PRO BOWL
Jared Leto, DE - Canton PRO BOWL
Shawn Bradberry, CB - Louisiana PRO BOWL
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I still don't get what you are trying to say.
Calling me an attention whore, a crying bitch, and what not in the PMs.
At least UD makes sense (Somewhat) in what he says.
You just... Don't.
AND WHAT PART OF I HAVE NO INFLUENCE ON WHAT PLAYERS ARE CHOSEN, OR WHAT PLAYERS WILL BE CHOSEN DO YOU NOT FREAKING GET?
Seriously. This wasn't made so that "players that want" can be on the list. Dumbass, most of these players are already on the Pro Bowl rosters. These are OWNERS nominations - I have nothing to say, or to do with who is on the list. I get asked to put them on, and I put them on... Pretty clear in the first post.
Offense:
Christian Ponder, QB - Tennessee PRO BOWL
Vinny Mormino, HB - 8 Mile PRO BOWL
Ricky Cannon, QB - California PRO BOWL
John Connor, WR - Nightmare PRO BOWL
Christy Joseph, TE - Sebring PRO BOWL
Swift Justus, RB - Capital PRO BOWL
Herman Blume, HB - Canton
Moose HeadLager, HB - Louisiana
Defense:
Preston "White Shoes" Bates, LB - Tennessee PRO BOWL
Demetrius Weezer, DE - 8 Mile PRO BOWL
Nacho Cheese, LB - California PRO BOWL
Mango Rinehardt, DE - Nightmare
Ian Joseph, LB - Sebring
R.A. Williams, CB - Capital PRO BOWL
Jared Leto, DE - Canton PRO BOWL
Shawn Bradberry, CB - Louisiana PRO BOWL
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I still don't get what you are trying to say.
Calling me an attention whore, a crying bitch, and what not in the PMs.
At least UD makes sense (Somewhat) in what he says.
You just... Don't.
AND WHAT PART OF I HAVE NO INFLUENCE ON WHAT PLAYERS ARE CHOSEN, OR WHAT PLAYERS WILL BE CHOSEN DO YOU NOT FREAKING GET?
Seriously. This wasn't made so that "players that want" can be on the list. Dumbass, most of these players are already on the Pro Bowl rosters. These are OWNERS nominations - I have nothing to say, or to do with who is on the list. I get asked to put them on, and I put them on... Pretty clear in the first post.
Last edited Feb 8, 2009 21:33:44
Diamonddog
offline
offline
I sure hope you are able to convince people to vote for your favorites LSU!!!
I want you to win imaginary awards for your selections.
I want you to win imaginary awards for your selections.
HeadHunterTex
offline
offline
I'm with LSU here. What is the huge issue with a guy trying to put together a pro-bowl roster and a legit MVP vote? Hell, your "white shoes" is on the list for both. Why are you crying?
LSU
offline
offline
Originally posted by Diamonddog
I sure hope you are able to convince people to vote for your favorites LSU!!!
I want you to win imaginary awards for your selections.
Again, these aren't my selections...
These are the selections of the owners. They would all say that.
Including the owner of your team.
This has nothing to do with my favorites (If I had to put up my favorites, there'd be only California players on this list). This is who the owners feel should be in contention for the MVP.
You don't get that - Then you're just an idiot.
Now run along chap, isn't it past your bedtime anyway?
I sure hope you are able to convince people to vote for your favorites LSU!!!
I want you to win imaginary awards for your selections.
Again, these aren't my selections...
These are the selections of the owners. They would all say that.
Including the owner of your team.
This has nothing to do with my favorites (If I had to put up my favorites, there'd be only California players on this list). This is who the owners feel should be in contention for the MVP.
You don't get that - Then you're just an idiot.
Now run along chap, isn't it past your bedtime anyway?
Last edited Feb 8, 2009 21:35:58
LSU
offline
offline
Originally posted by HeadHunterTex
I'm with LSU here. What is the huge issue with a guy trying to put together a pro-bowl roster and a legit MVP vote? Hell, your "white shoes" is on the list for both. Why are you crying?
Thank you, finally someone backs me up on this.
He's making no sense. At all.
I'm with LSU here. What is the huge issue with a guy trying to put together a pro-bowl roster and a legit MVP vote? Hell, your "white shoes" is on the list for both. Why are you crying?
Thank you, finally someone backs me up on this.
He's making no sense. At all.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
