Originally posted by jmog
Right now, since the whole season hasn't played out and we haven't all played each other, yes, USA has more wins vs 6-2 teams than the rest of us.
However, that's only a great use of the tie breaker come the end of the season when we've played each other.
Head to head McLuney beat USA by 17. We just haven't played Danbury or Tulsa yet like they have.
I would say, until we lose to one of these said teams, McLuney should be ranked the best of the 6-2's, we beat USA and beat the 7-1 New Jersey team with only a 1 pt loss to a 5-3 Buncha team.
Now, if Tulsa or Danbury knock us off, then by all means, we were "over rated".
You could choose to rank yourself wherever you want, I am choosing to rank you lower than that. You lost to Buncha and I also see that you struggled against Trinsic a team that Danbury beat 66-0. I am basing it on what I have seen. It's my opinion, we will see who is right in a few days.
Right now, since the whole season hasn't played out and we haven't all played each other, yes, USA has more wins vs 6-2 teams than the rest of us.
However, that's only a great use of the tie breaker come the end of the season when we've played each other.
Head to head McLuney beat USA by 17. We just haven't played Danbury or Tulsa yet like they have.
I would say, until we lose to one of these said teams, McLuney should be ranked the best of the 6-2's, we beat USA and beat the 7-1 New Jersey team with only a 1 pt loss to a 5-3 Buncha team.
Now, if Tulsa or Danbury knock us off, then by all means, we were "over rated".
You could choose to rank yourself wherever you want, I am choosing to rank you lower than that. You lost to Buncha and I also see that you struggled against Trinsic a team that Danbury beat 66-0. I am basing it on what I have seen. It's my opinion, we will see who is right in a few days.






























