Warrior General Games

Originally posted by gameface25
Originally posted by PunkOnTheCorner

#2 CB, strong side...More strength, even blocking is worth training up a bit. You need to be unblockable by WRs to help with run support. Not as much speed needed but keep more agility. Jumping must be capped@48, catching should be 40+. You will eat off the tight coverage from the #1 CB(hopefully).

Train carrying up to 35+ so you can take those INTs to the house.

am I missing something, or since when does blocking on a CB mean he wont be blocked by a WR....?

I could see maybe adding some str and tackling more than you would on a CB1, but blocking?

Yes you are missing something. Blocking not only helps players block effectively but also helps players get off of blocks more effectively. Not worth SPs but training to 30 will surely help the #2CB. Sounds crazy to most people, but it surely works.

Originally posted by PunkOnTheCorner
Train carrying up to 35+ so you can take those INTs to the house.

dumbest shit ever.

carrying doesnt need to be any higher than 20 (25 at max)

oh first u need to be able to GET the Ints before u can think about taking them back

+1 to the strenght idea

Originally posted by MattMan Firespot
Originally posted by gameface25

Originally posted by PunkOnTheCorner


#2 CB, strong side...More strength, even blocking is worth training up a bit. You need to be unblockable by WRs to help with run support. Not as much speed needed but keep more agility. Jumping must be capped@48, catching should be 40+. You will eat off the tight coverage from the #1 CB(hopefully).

Train carrying up to 35+ so you can take those INTs to the house.

am I missing something, or since when does blocking on a CB mean he wont be blocked by a WR....?

I could see maybe adding some str and tackling more than you would on a CB1, but blocking?

Yes you are missing something. Blocking not only helps players block effectively but also helps players get off of blocks more effectively. Not worth SPs but training to 30 will surely help the #2CB. Sounds crazy to most people, but it surely works.

DEs have tested this(yes I know they are a different position) and they have not seen a noticeable improvement. Your better off training Strength and bullrushing the WR, this also helps hit the WR harder if he catches the ball.

Strenght is better to train until 35-40 before the training value drops significantly. Also, DEs face OLinemen who have MUCH MUCH more blocking than they do and this is not the case for CBs/WRs.

Originally posted by PapaCJ
Originally posted by PunkOnTheCorner

Train carrying up to 35+ so you can take those INTs to the house.

dumbest shit ever.

carrying doesnt need to be any higher than 20 (25 at max)

oh first u need to be able to GET the Ints before u can think about taking them back

+1 to the strenght idea

You are a fool which is why both the teams you GM have double the losses than they do wins. You really dont know what you are talking about. 20-25 carrying is nothing....Lol@ dumbest shit ever coming from a guy who knows 0 about GLB.

The INTs come, even without catching...I have CBs who take most of their INTs to the house...While you have, well, crapola

http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=179115

Originally posted by MattMan Firespot
Originally posted by PapaCJ

Originally posted by PunkOnTheCorner


Train carrying up to 35+ so you can take those INTs to the house.

dumbest shit ever.

carrying doesnt need to be any higher than 20 (25 at max)

oh first u need to be able to GET the Ints before u can think about taking them back

+1 to the strenght idea

You are a fool which is why both the teams you GM have double the losses than they do wins. You really dont know what you are talking about. 20-25 carrying is nothing....Lol@ dumbest shit ever coming from a guy who knows 0 about GLB.

The INTs come, even without catching...I have CBs who take most of their INTs to the house...While you have, well, crapola

http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=179115

you judge his knowledge of the game by the teams he GMs record? dumbest shit ever is right there

yes definitely. no results. probably the most logical shit ever.