Warrior General Games

and having an offensive gameplan is important, def. gameplanniing is also but you have more control over the offense

Originally posted by Randy03Texags
Well having looked at the AAA teams that came up, Zeta still looks like

Prague
SGA
LRC
Percival

Rest

None of the guys that came up seem to have the levels or superior builds across the board to just jump out and say "whoa" like say .. Percival did this season.

This

Originally posted by Kenchi
My prediction............... "PAIN!"

WINNA OF THE THREAD!

Originally posted by HoustonMark
Originally posted by Randy03Texags

Well having looked at the AAA teams that came up, Zeta still looks like

Prague
SGA
LRC
Percival

Rest

None of the guys that came up seem to have the levels or superior builds across the board to just jump out and say "whoa" like say .. Percival did this season.

This

Don't count out the Ballers!

they will see once we get started, we are usually overlooked at first

As someone who has played the Ballers every season I can vouch that they're good. But I would still be impressed to see them in the top 3... they have a shot at 4th maybe though. But I doubt they finish lower than 5th.

Originally posted by Enders
As someone who has played the Ballers every season I can vouch that they're good. But I would still be impressed to see them in the top 3... they have a shot at 4th maybe though. But I doubt they finish lower than 5th.

they have higher levels but our builds are not that far apart, its really gonna come down to tactics on most weeks, and I like the guy making the calls for my team, hes proven he knows what hes doing.

A six level gap is a lot to make up, but it can happen. We were able to beat Percival and EEORG although highly out talented.

Originally posted by Rezlov
A six level gap is a lot to make up, but it can happen. We were able to beat Percival and EEORG although highly out talented.

theres nothing to make up if your build is better.

Greg he was talking about the guy 6 levels higher having an extra 30 sp to spend and likely an equipment upgrade ahead.

That's a lot to make up for the player that is 6 levels lower.

If the build is that bad that someone 6 levels lower is better than they probably aren't on the top 4 teams in Pro.

Originally posted by Enders
Greg he was talking about the guy 6 levels higher having an extra 30 sp to spend and likely an equipment upgrade ahead.

That's a lot to make up for the player that is 6 levels lower.

If the build is that bad that someone 6 levels lower is better than they probably aren't on the top 4 teams in Pro.

then why do we have better builds?

our team have builds that fit what we do, and i have designed our offense to fit our player builds,to me guys that says tactics dont matter dont know much about the AI, i think we can win this league and should finish no lower than 4th, all our starters arent 6 lvls lower, just the backfield, and i would say our backfield has been super productive

Lol who do you have better builds than greg? Team wise. And what makes you think you're builds are better than said team?

Originally posted by Enders
Lol who do you have better builds than greg? Team wise. And what makes you think you're builds are better than said team?

i am just saying that i like our builds and i like our Off AI. and what we do on offense, i like our defensive builds i may have to make a couple of adjustments to the def. ai, sometimes it gives up big passing yardage but we force turnovers and get a lot of sacks and pressures as you can vouch for that

I agree with what you're saying kanaan. But greg is flat out saying you guys have better builds. So I'm curious as to which of the 4 teams that Randy listed, or any other team, that he thinks the Ballers have better builds than. And what makes him think those builds are better.