Warrior General Games

Originally posted by kingofgod
My Rb does just fine with 85 speed 50 agility, 30 vision and running on elusive

you mean the guy with 800 yards and 16 touchdowns of which 200 yards and 8 touchdowns just came last game. Are you serious right now?

Originally posted by UnderDogs
Originally posted by Jack Del Rio

your FB is a piece of shit

Not really, the f.b. is a great build. IT was directly related to having all equipment in speed and running on elusive. I wouldn't dare have tried that unless it was a bad team. I see everyone talk about speed so I wanted to see. And it isn't as good. If you look at the team we lost to. My HB had more agility and ran on combo. He runs through the holes better and follows his lead blockers a hell of a lot better.

Yeah I'll take that back he looks like he does alright on certain formations, like the strong I off tackle run, where he can get up and block the LB, but there are some that he's not looking so hot on. Maybe the plays themselves are buggy, one of them was a Pro Set run where the FB literally just stood around scratching his balls, but yea maybe there are just some plays that FBs don't do too well on.

Originally posted by Jack Del Rio
Originally posted by UnderDogs

Originally posted by Jack Del Rio


your FB is a piece of shit

Not really, the f.b. is a great build. IT was directly related to having all equipment in speed and running on elusive. I wouldn't dare have tried that unless it was a bad team. I see everyone talk about speed so I wanted to see. And it isn't as good. If you look at the team we lost to. My HB had more agility and ran on combo. He runs through the holes better and follows his lead blockers a hell of a lot better.

Yeah I'll take that back he looks like he does alright on certain formations, like the strong I off tackle run, where he can get up and block the LB, but there are some that he's not looking so hot on. Maybe the plays themselves are buggy, one of them was a Pro Set run where the FB literally just stood around scratching his balls, but yea maybe there are just some plays that FBs don't do too well on.

yeah certain plays, he looks dumb lol.

Originally posted by UnderDogs
Originally posted by kingofgod

My Rb does just fine with 85 speed 50 agility, 30 vision and running on elusive

you mean the guy with 800 yards and 16 touchdowns of which 200 yards and 8 touchdowns just came last game. Are you serious right now?

That same RB ran for 3,000 and 58 TD's last season... I'd believe him over you who is trying to prove a biased point by blaming speed and elusive running for your troubles vs. a better defensive scheme.

Originally posted by Grim Truth
Originally posted by UnderDogs

Originally posted by kingofgod


My Rb does just fine with 85 speed 50 agility, 30 vision and running on elusive

you mean the guy with 800 yards and 16 touchdowns of which 200 yards and 8 touchdowns just came last game. Are you serious right now?

That same RB ran for 3,000 and 58 TD's last season... I'd believe him over you who is trying to prove a biased point by blaming speed and elusive running for your troubles vs. a better defensive scheme.

Who is talking about last season? this game is always changing.

Originally posted by Grim Truth
Originally posted by UnderDogs

Originally posted by kingofgod


My Rb does just fine with 85 speed 50 agility, 30 vision and running on elusive

you mean the guy with 800 yards and 16 touchdowns of which 200 yards and 8 touchdowns just came last game. Are you serious right now?

That same RB ran for 3,000 and 58 TD's last season... I'd believe him over you who is trying to prove a biased point by blaming speed and elusive running for your troubles vs. a better defensive scheme.

Yes because running for over 200 yards and 5 touchdowns is troubling me.

3100 yards and 57 touchdowns after 10 games.

its better not to argue with underwear, he smells of cock and hes a moron.

speed > agi

Sorry but it wasn't because of the equipment in speed. It was because you ran on elusive.

Originally posted by Lord Thomas Drake
its better not to argue with underwear, he smells of cock and hes a moron.

speed > agi



You probably know nothing about speed. I bet I have more speed than you 5 levels lower without all my equipment there.

Originally posted by htm11
Sorry but it wasn't because of the equipment in speed. It was because you ran on elusive.

No no, it had to be done for the experiment.

Originally posted by UnderDogs
Originally posted by htm11

Sorry but it wasn't because of the equipment in speed. It was because you ran on elusive.

No no, it had to be done for the experiment.

yeah but you have been talking about agility better then speed all in this forum, but you have been running on combo all yr, but you change your equipment to speed and run on elusive and blame it on the speed.

I'm sorry but elusive has more to do with agility then speed does. You would have probably had a worse game on elusive if you would have left your equipment in agility especially since your vision isn't that high.

Originally posted by UnderDogs
Failed big time. my ypc was way down last game. sorry I will stick with agility and running on combo.

had 93.33 speed with all equipment in speed. THank you Come again.

you just said you had all your equipment in speed and you would bet you had more speed then me without your equipment on, you fail I'm sorry

Originally posted by Lord Thomas Drake
Originally posted by UnderDogs

Failed big time. my ypc was way down last game. sorry I will stick with agility and running on combo.

had 93.33 speed with all equipment in speed. THank you Come again.

you just said you had all your equipment in speed and you would bet you had more speed then me without your equipment on, you fail I'm sorry

Still waiting for you to open the build. I can't fail you're 5 levels higher than me. you better hope you have more speed having 25 more points to spend.

Wow, I'm not conviced you didn't have a decent game. 4.8 ypc isn't bad (Not Madden numbers, but still). I would want, on average, to be faced with a 3rd and .4 with a RB that typically gives me 4. That seems to be okay. But yes, if you want 9-10 ypc then you're halfway there (woo ooohh, living on a prayer).

I think we're starting to see some normalization or "realifying" (realization was taken) of the numbers which will result in more real (ie around 5 ypc for GREAT rbs) stat sheets.

Originally posted by LarryB
Wow, I'm not conviced you didn't have a decent game. 4.8 ypc isn't bad (Not Madden numbers, but still). I would want, on average, to be faced with a 3rd and .4 with a RB that typically gives me 4. That seems to be okay. But yes, if you want 9-10 ypc then you're halfway there (woo ooohh, living on a prayer).

I think we're starting to see some normalization or "realifying" (realization was taken) of the numbers which will result in more real (ie around 5 ypc for GREAT rbs) stat sheets.

nah but playing against a team that bad he should have had at least 8-10 y.p.c. he has 15 tfl all season and 4 in one game against a bad team. He tries to do "too Much" he never really takes full advantage of the speed. plus he didn't break a single tackle against a bad team when he has close to 100 for the season? All those things tell me something was definitely wrong.