I had a game where I had 1 punt, and was on the KRS for the opposing team's 9 punts + 2 kickoffs. 37 XP. Last season, that would have had me at 100 XP for the game.
Originally posted by ipstaff I had a game where I had 1 punt, and was on the KRS for the opposing team's 9 punts + 2 kickoffs. 37 XP. Last season, that would have had me at 100 XP for the game.
Originally posted by cheffrey85 That would be better than it is now, but I don't agree with it.
If your punter is getting the maximum number of snaps in each game you should get the maximum amount of XP per game. Any other player getting them maximum number of snaps at their position would get full xp, so why should punters be any different?
Punter XP should not be based on a set number of punts per game because there are too many factors that determine the number of chances to punt you'll even get. It should be based on the number of punts in each game. You punt 4 of 4 punts in a game, 100% xp, 7 of 7, 100%, 1 of 1, 100% and so on.
Best solution I've seen for this problem! And it could easily be applied to all other positions as well. What percentage of offensive plays for offensive players, percentage of defensive plays for defensive players. Pretty cut and dry. 2nd string or lower players that are on and ST depth charts would get the percentage of ST plays for the team they are DC'd for. (KOS, KRS, or BOTH)
Originally posted by cheffrey85 That would be better than it is now, but I don't agree with it.
If your punter is getting the maximum number of snaps in each game you should get the maximum amount of XP per game. Any other player getting them maximum number of snaps at their position would get full xp, so why should punters be any different?
Punter XP should not be based on a set number of punts per game because there are too many factors that determine the number of chances to punt you'll even get. It should be based on the number of punts in each game. You punt 4 of 4 punts in a game, 100% xp, 7 of 7, 100%, 1 of 1, 100% and so on.