Warrior General Games

Carthage Army Of Darkness vs. Stockholm Meatballs 24-31

So what does this prove that a team that is 6-10 competes with a team that is 14-2?

Either:

a) Alpha's bottom teams can compete with Zeta's top teams

or

b) Results of these games are worth about as much as a promise/guarantee straight from a politician's mouth.

Take your pick, either way, continue arguing it's entertaining

Originally posted by Farlig
Carthage Army Of Darkness vs. Stockholm Meatballs 24-31

So what does this prove that a team that is 6-10 competes with a team that is 14-2?

Either:

a) Alpha's bottom teams can compete with Zeta's top teams

or

b) Results of these games are worth about as much as a promise/guarantee straight from a politician's mouth.

Take your pick, either way, continue arguing it's entertaining

who won?

Stockholm said they were trying new stuff. Plus, Carthage is a crazy team who beats real good teams and loses to bad teams.

Well the Rohrheim Stampede almost beat Alpha's top team. We can argue it both ways mate, so Alpha should just take the lost graciously and admit that they suck.

Originally posted by coreyls18


who won?

Rhetorical question? (I guess you missed the underlying tone of my post being a joke - see last sentence of first post).

Pretty much all the info you need to answer the Alpha vs. Zeta question is in the "Streak" column in the standings... right there, plain as day.

Originally posted by larkis
Well the Rohrheim Stampede almost beat Alpha's top team. We can argue it both ways mate, so Alpha should just take the lost graciously and admit that they suck.

I guess you too missed the underlying tone of my post being a joke - see last sentence of first post as well as option B.

Originally posted by Farlig
Originally posted by coreyls18



who won?

Rhetorical question? (I guess you missed the underlying tone of my post being a joke - see last sentence of first post).

Good game, BTW. Lynch is a wrecking ball.

Originally posted by kalkmanc
Stockholm said they were trying new stuff. Plus, Carthage is a crazy team who beats real good teams and loses to bad teams.

I wish I knew how we pull off some of the upsets we do. Either way, its fun proving the computer and player predictions wrong

Originally posted by Farlig
Originally posted by larkis

Well the Rohrheim Stampede almost beat Alpha's top team. We can argue it both ways mate, so Alpha should just take the lost graciously and admit that they suck.

I guess you too missed the underlying tone of my post being a joke - see last sentence of first post as well as option B.

Well Just admit that Alpha sucks

Originally posted by Farlig
Carthage Army Of Darkness vs. Stockholm Meatballs 24-31

So what does this prove that a team that is 6-10 competes with a team that is 14-2?

Either:

a) Alpha's bottom teams can compete with Zeta's top teams

or

b) Results of these games are worth about as much as a promise/guarantee straight from a politician's mouth.

Take your pick, either way, continue arguing it's entertaining

Ya man, it's the third post in the thread.

Originally posted by Farlig

b) Results of these games are worth about as much as a promise/guarantee straight from a politician's mouth.

Take your pick, either way, continue arguing it's entertaining

Ok I will try this ONE LAST TIME. My post was not to say I think Carthage is on Stochkholm's level or that we ALMOST won the game or SHOULD have won the game. It's kind of hard to make that assumption after "the third post in the thread" (yes I read it). I've even included the part of my quote I want you to focus on.

Please stop trying to make me out as some cocky guy trying to claim his team is great (I am not, nor have I have been a member of the Pimps, no offense meant to the Pimps, you guys entertain me as well). It was simply to poke fun at any one who MIGHT be serious that one conference is in fact better than the other.

Originally posted by Farlig

Ok I will try this ONE LAST TIME. My post was not to say I think Carthage is on Stochkholm's level or that we ALMOST won the game or SHOULD have won the game. It's kind of hard to make that assumption after "the third post in the thread" (yes I read it). I've even included the part of my quote I want you to focus on.

Please stop trying to make me out as some cocky guy trying to claim his team is great (I am not, nor have I have been a member of the Pimps, no offense meant to the Pimps, you guys entertain me as well). It was simply to poke fun at any one who MIGHT be serious that one conference is in fact better than the other.


again...who won? I rest me case, and i am trying to be a cocky asshole.

Chicago lost again.

Originally posted by cajik
Chicago lost again.

They're in alpha. What else would you expect?