Warrior General Games

Originally posted by reggiefrom40
Yeah sorry to say but I was disappointed. Had you guys lost, not only would we have had a shot to get in with your tough end-of-season schedule, but you guys would have really fallen off there.

Of course I wasn't hoping for you to suffer, but it would have been the easiest way for us to get in. Now we'll have to depend on a miraculous upset of Midwest over Rocky Mountain. It would require a perfect gameplan to knock them off. Then Rocky Mountain would have to lose its last game for us to have a shot as it has the tiebreaker with us due to points scored.

Great season, great game. What a thriller.

I thought the first tie breaker was head to head, first?

Great game DV - We have now made it a little more interesting....

Originally posted by Morphius
Originally posted by tsluxx

Just out of morbid curiosity - what would things look like if DVDTalk beat Capricia and Rapid City and Anchorage won out?

We'd have four 14-2 teams at the top of the Western Conference...how screwy would that be?

It would go to records, then points scored. In which case Rapid City and Caprica would tie and go to points scored. Then Anchorage and DVD would tie and go to points scored. Assuming DVD wins out that is.

In that case, Caprica beat Rapid City and Anchorage, but not DVD. Rapid City beat DVD and Anchorage, but not Caprica. Anchorage beat DVD, but not Caprica or Rapid City. DVD beat Caprica, but not Anchorage or Rapid city. So between the 4 teams that gives Rapid City and Caprica 2 wins a peice and Anchorage and DVD 1 a piece. Thats why it would then go to points scored the way I orignially explained it.

Having gotten to see this in the East, before it goes to points scored, it takes head to head. If there's teams where A beat B who beat C who beat A, it takes best head to head among the involved teams.
Then it goes to points scored.

Originally posted by GwennA
Originally posted by Morphius

Originally posted by tsluxx


Just out of morbid curiosity - what would things look like if DVDTalk beat Capricia and Rapid City and Anchorage won out?

We'd have four 14-2 teams at the top of the Western Conference...how screwy would that be?

It would go to records, then points scored. In which case Rapid City and Caprica would tie and go to points scored. Then Anchorage and DVD would tie and go to points scored. Assuming DVD wins out that is.

In that case, Caprica beat Rapid City and Anchorage, but not DVD. Rapid City beat DVD and Anchorage, but not Caprica. Anchorage beat DVD, but not Caprica or Rapid City. DVD beat Caprica, but not Anchorage or Rapid city. So between the 4 teams that gives Rapid City and Caprica 2 wins a peice and Anchorage and DVD 1 a piece. Thats why it would then go to points scored the way I orignially explained it.

Having gotten to see this in the East, before it goes to points scored, it takes head to head. If there's teams where A beat B who beat C who beat A, it takes best head to head among the involved teams.
Then it goes to points scored.

Thats exactly what I was saying. Maybe I explained it to complicated.

Originally posted by Morphius
Originally posted by GwennA
Originally posted by Morphius
Originally posted by tsluxx

Just out of morbid curiosity - what would things look like if DVDTalk beat Capricia and Rapid City and Anchorage won out?

We'd have four 14-2 teams at the top of the Western Conference...how screwy would that be?
It would go to records, then points scored. In which case Rapid City and Caprica would tie and go to points scored. Then Anchorage and DVD would tie and go to points scored. Assuming DVD wins out that is.

In that case, Caprica beat Rapid City and Anchorage, but not DVD. Rapid City beat DVD and Anchorage, but not Caprica. Anchorage beat DVD, but not Caprica or Rapid City. DVD beat Caprica, but not Anchorage or Rapid city. So between the 4 teams that gives Rapid City and Caprica 2 wins a peice and Anchorage and DVD 1 a piece. Thats why it would then go to points scored the way I orignially explained it.
Having gotten to see this in the East, before it goes to points scored, it takes head to head. If there's teams where A beat B who beat C who beat A, it takes best head to head among the involved teams.
Then it goes to points scored.
Thats exactly what I was saying. Maybe I explained it to complicated.

Made sense to me.