Warrior General Games

How about we post on every team forum. Have people from each team do it?

You and me? Ok, but I don't think tooley's going to give me access to OTR's forum

I will ask him. And some owner can give it to him to show that is all we are going to do. I am going to make this happen. John5 for president 2008 haha.

Why dont each owner post players they think are worthy of a PB vote and we tally up players that way. Owners should know their players better that anyone so, what you guys think?

Whatever requires the least amount of effort out of me.

Originally posted by bluur27
Why dont each owner post players they think are worthy of a PB vote and we tally up players that way. Owners should know their players better that anyone so, what you guys think?

Favortisim

Originally posted by driftin079
Whatever requires the least amount of effort out of me.

Reverse cowgirl

Originally posted by jonathantastic
Originally posted by jwman92

i would be on the committee, however, I like the formula better

I think you should be at least 18 to be on the committee


Why? Do you have something against me because I am not 18?

No matter what we do for the probowl, I nominate Demarcus Tribble
and Big N' Ugly.


They should make the team no doubt about it!

Fresno Fire:
DJ Bluur CB
Cory Gee HB
Chris Happy QB
Peeh Onu CB
Mike Fanne SS
Klick Klack K
Hammerhead Suhey FB

SJ Chupacabra

CB-Roscoe Coltraine > 6 INT/3 INT-TD
DT-Kurt Reynolds > 8 SACK/16 HUR/4 FF/1 INT-TD
DE-Phineus Dump > 7 FF/3 FF-TD/7 SACK

Originally posted by deacon6878
Originally posted by driftin079

Whatever requires the least amount of effort out of me.

Reverse cowgirl

+1

I think we should have 2 owners from each team vote.

My best idea though, but it never gained any traction, was that each owner should have an official ballot at the end of the season and vote for a pro bowl. Each player that was voted in by the league would get an icon that would count towards their fame rating.

great idea, but the fame hasnt even kicked in yet like it was supposed to

1. We form a committee of 5 based on vote by the league. The committee members must nominate themselves first, so that they are on board with spending the time in evaluations. There should be a seperate committee for east and west conferences.

2. The 5 committee members nominate a chair to decide tie-breaks and format the lists.

3. The 5 committee members work to agree to a pro bowl nominee list of 3 players per position for the best in their own conference. The pro bowl nominee list is published to the forum.

4. The committee of the west then consults to determine the best of each postion from the 3 nominated players in the east. The commitee of the east then consults to determine the best of each position from the 3 nominated players in the west. The final pro-bowl list is published to the forum by the chair of each committe at an agreed upon time. The other pro bowl nominees not selected by the committee will be considered to be 2nd team.

**************************

Obviously selecting the 5 committee members is important, so you need rules. Cannot have 2 committee members on any 1 team. I would say that the committe members should be made up of non-playoff teams, but this may be hard to do.

Thoughts?