Just for the record, I was joking about the planning on beating the Cubes, but we do plan on beating Michigan. That's why we're saving our +5s for them. Wait, did I just fall for it? Doh.
Sanderval
offline
offline
Originally posted by cabrasher
Just for the record, I was joking about the planning on beating the Cubes, but we do plan on beating Michigan. That's why we're saving our +5s for them.
You... and and every team we've played.. same old story..
The only people i'm even remotely concerned in seeing +5's from are Seattle and the Heat. But we've got +5's too y'know.. and i'm not above using them in game 15, even if we play the heat the game after.
Just for the record, I was joking about the planning on beating the Cubes, but we do plan on beating Michigan. That's why we're saving our +5s for them.
You... and and every team we've played.. same old story..
The only people i'm even remotely concerned in seeing +5's from are Seattle and the Heat. But we've got +5's too y'know.. and i'm not above using them in game 15, even if we play the heat the game after.
Originally posted by Sanderval
Originally posted by cabrasher
Just for the record, I was joking about the planning on beating the Cubes, but we do plan on beating Michigan. That's why we're saving our +5s for them.
You... and and every team we've played.. same old story..
The only people i'm even remotely concerned in seeing +5's from are Seattle and the Heat. But we've got +5's too y'know.. and i'm not above using them in game 15, even if we play the heat the game after.
15-1 ain't cursed as far as I know
Originally posted by cabrasher
Just for the record, I was joking about the planning on beating the Cubes, but we do plan on beating Michigan. That's why we're saving our +5s for them.
You... and and every team we've played.. same old story..
The only people i'm even remotely concerned in seeing +5's from are Seattle and the Heat. But we've got +5's too y'know.. and i'm not above using them in game 15, even if we play the heat the game after.
15-1 ain't cursed as far as I know
randomguymike
offline
offline
Originally posted by Sanderval
You... and and every team we've played..
Somebody thinks highly of themselves.
You... and and every team we've played..
Somebody thinks highly of themselves.
Sanderval
offline
offline
Originally posted by randomguymike
Originally posted by Sanderval
You... and and every team we've played..
Somebody thinks highly of themselves.
So it's thinking highly of myself to assume that every team we played wanted to win the game? I didn't mean that everyone used +5's against us.. geez.. but, if you want to put that out there.. Michigan & Seattle are the most likely teams that people would use +5's against, and most people play us far enough apart to do it.. so it's not entirely unreasonable.
Originally posted by Sanderval
You... and and every team we've played..
Somebody thinks highly of themselves.
So it's thinking highly of myself to assume that every team we played wanted to win the game? I didn't mean that everyone used +5's against us.. geez.. but, if you want to put that out there.. Michigan & Seattle are the most likely teams that people would use +5's against, and most people play us far enough apart to do it.. so it's not entirely unreasonable.
Last edited Oct 14, 2008 11:17:21
Sanderval
offline
offline
Originally posted by tcl
whistle.
Were you whistling for Knick to bump more threads?
whistle.
Were you whistling for Knick to bump more threads?
cabrasher
offline
offline
Ha, that was ugly. They scored more than the prediction, and we scored less than the prediction, so I guess, I was wrong all around. I tried a few new AIs that will probably not find their way back into the playbook again.
cabrasher
offline
offline
Hmm...that's weird. He said he was resigning last night, and I just didn't check assuming that he did. Yeah, having all of your secondary at 10 ending breath with is never a good thing, not to mention having only 3 CBs and trying to run a CB blitz every other play.
Last edited Oct 14, 2008 14:53:17
cabrasher
offline
offline
Originally posted by Sanderval
Why would you even admit to that..
Why would you even care that I admitted to that?
Why would you even admit to that..
Why would you even care that I admitted to that?
tcl
offline
offline
i don't think it was exactly a secret, heh.
that's a bummer. yeah, your secondary could definitely use some depth.
that's a bummer. yeah, your secondary could definitely use some depth.
Sanderval
offline
offline
Originally posted by cabrasher
Why would you even care that I admitted to that?
My bad.. your tactical mastery wins the day.
Why would you even care that I admitted to that?
My bad.. your tactical mastery wins the day.
cabrasher
offline
offline
Originally posted by Sanderval
Originally posted by cabrasher
Why would you even care that I admitted to that?
My bad.. your tactical mastery wins the day.
It's ok.
Originally posted by cabrasher
Why would you even care that I admitted to that?
My bad.. your tactical mastery wins the day.
It's ok.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
