Originally posted by dmaxwell
All I have to say aaddron is the records and scoreboards say otherwise.
What scoreboards?
All I have to say aaddron is the records and scoreboards say otherwise.
What scoreboards?
pastygangst1
offline
offline
Originally posted by dmaxwell
You lost me at #1. Yea let's rank the Breakers over a tean that beat them easily, and will destroy them again. I will never read one of your worthless threads again. I bet you think the breakers recievers are better then ours as well.
Relax man, it's a power ranking.
You lost me at #1. Yea let's rank the Breakers over a tean that beat them easily, and will destroy them again. I will never read one of your worthless threads again. I bet you think the breakers recievers are better then ours as well.
Relax man, it's a power ranking.
Atrain72
offline
offline
Originally posted by jimo2305
british accent: "ALMOST.. ALMOST.. ALMOST.. ERR, WE ARE" ... 'well done'
kudos to who can figure out where that quote's from
Family guy
british accent: "ALMOST.. ALMOST.. ALMOST.. ERR, WE ARE" ... 'well done'
kudos to who can figure out where that quote's from
Family guy
Atrain72
offline
offline
Originally posted by dmaxwell
You lost me at #1. Yea let's rank the Breakers over a tean that beat them easily, and will destroy them again. I will never read one of your worthless threads again. I bet you think the breakers recievers are better then ours as well.
It's not like he's getting paid to do this you ungrateful piece of shit. And its not like he's got any reason to "fix" the power rankings. Why dont you do the 7 a favor and keep your fucking mouth shut.
/rage
You lost me at #1. Yea let's rank the Breakers over a tean that beat them easily, and will destroy them again. I will never read one of your worthless threads again. I bet you think the breakers recievers are better then ours as well.
It's not like he's getting paid to do this you ungrateful piece of shit. And its not like he's got any reason to "fix" the power rankings. Why dont you do the 7 a favor and keep your fucking mouth shut.
/rage
ajkj36
offline
offline
Slow down here guys. I am the head coach of the Tarheels and the whole team is a little ticked off about the power rankings. It seems the rankings are taking into consideration margin of victory more so than quality wins. Well that sounds like the old BCS way of thinking. Our team uses cupcake games to try different strategies as most of you do as well. I think this sim is more about strategy than about beating someone in the ground. Our team doesnt care about winning 200-0, we just want to win games and hopefully win a championship. We have built our team from literally nothing. Davidow and myself have traded, signed, and built this team on one principal: TEAM
We dont have the highest budget nor do we have the biggest stadium, but what we do have are guys with pride who really want to win. If the power rankings say we are number 3 because we dont try to drill the weaker teams in the ground so be it. But everyone of the teams we have faced will tell you we are one of, if not the best team in the West bar none. Power rankings as far as I am concerned are a piece of crap. Wins and losses are what counts in the end, and the last time I looked there are only two undefeated teams in the division, Red Bank and the Tarheels. Are they the two best teams? No one knows until the end, but for right now until someone beats us or Red Bank we are the tops in the 7.
Jimo, do your power rankings all you want, put us last if you want. The Tarheels will answer all questions at the end of the season.
We dont have the highest budget nor do we have the biggest stadium, but what we do have are guys with pride who really want to win. If the power rankings say we are number 3 because we dont try to drill the weaker teams in the ground so be it. But everyone of the teams we have faced will tell you we are one of, if not the best team in the West bar none. Power rankings as far as I am concerned are a piece of crap. Wins and losses are what counts in the end, and the last time I looked there are only two undefeated teams in the division, Red Bank and the Tarheels. Are they the two best teams? No one knows until the end, but for right now until someone beats us or Red Bank we are the tops in the 7.
Jimo, do your power rankings all you want, put us last if you want. The Tarheels will answer all questions at the end of the season.
JoSCh
offline
offline
Originally posted by ajkj36
Jimo, do your power rankings all you want...
Boils down to this, pretty much everything else you said is opinion, and I think dmaxwell has shown us that opinions are to be ridiculed in this forum. Good day!
Jimo, do your power rankings all you want...
Boils down to this, pretty much everything else you said is opinion, and I think dmaxwell has shown us that opinions are to be ridiculed in this forum. Good day!
darkeklaw
offline
offline
Originally posted by JoSCh
Originally posted by ajkj36
Jimo, do your power rankings all you want...
Boils down to this, pretty much everything else you said is opinion, and I think dmaxwell has shown us that opinions are to be ridiculed in this forum. Good day!
You do know that the power rankings are also just Jimo's opinion using a formula he dug up from god knows where to use, like he some kind of Jimmy the Greek, or John Madden. Listen Jimo made his picks, Dmax disagreed, MY Coach came and said his piece... If you wanna settle this let's have a friendly.
As far as I'm concerned the Formula has a flaw in it because the two teams with the best record are ranked under a team that's been beaten by an undefeated team. So I think Jimo needs to go check where the flaw is in that formula, because numbers don't lie and right now the Tarheels are the best team in the Western Conferance of the 7. That's not an opinion, that's a fact 10-0 it isn't a string of good luck, its what happens when a team does what's best for the team and you don't have a bunch of primadonnas running around worrying about whether or not their fake football player is going to get enough fake play time...
Don't get me wrong, it's not Jimo who's at fault but there deffinately is something wrong with the formula he's using...
Originally posted by ajkj36
Jimo, do your power rankings all you want...
Boils down to this, pretty much everything else you said is opinion, and I think dmaxwell has shown us that opinions are to be ridiculed in this forum. Good day!
You do know that the power rankings are also just Jimo's opinion using a formula he dug up from god knows where to use, like he some kind of Jimmy the Greek, or John Madden. Listen Jimo made his picks, Dmax disagreed, MY Coach came and said his piece... If you wanna settle this let's have a friendly.
As far as I'm concerned the Formula has a flaw in it because the two teams with the best record are ranked under a team that's been beaten by an undefeated team. So I think Jimo needs to go check where the flaw is in that formula, because numbers don't lie and right now the Tarheels are the best team in the Western Conferance of the 7. That's not an opinion, that's a fact 10-0 it isn't a string of good luck, its what happens when a team does what's best for the team and you don't have a bunch of primadonnas running around worrying about whether or not their fake football player is going to get enough fake play time...
Don't get me wrong, it's not Jimo who's at fault but there deffinately is something wrong with the formula he's using...
Aaddron
offline
offline
Originally posted by ajkj36
Are they the two best teams? No one knows until the end
If that's true then why are you saying your one of the best? If no one knows who is then that includes you.
Originally posted by ajkj36
Wins and losses are what counts in the end
So then according to what you said above the season end after game 16 is played?
No championships are what count in the end. Wins and losses are only so important you can go 16-0 every season but if you don't win the championship then you failed.
I'd rather win a championship than win every game during the season. I'd rather play good than win every game. You don't have to be 16-0 to be the best you have to play like the best and so far there are 2 teams that have played better then the perfect teams and the power rankings reflect it.
jimo if you have the time could you show us the points the top 4 teams are behind the Breakers?
So far we know:
Breakers-(-)
Louisville Baby Kittens-(-.6)
Texas Tarheels-(?)
Red Bank Thundercats-(?)
Appalachian Lycans-(?)
Are they the two best teams? No one knows until the end
If that's true then why are you saying your one of the best? If no one knows who is then that includes you.
Originally posted by ajkj36
Wins and losses are what counts in the end
So then according to what you said above the season end after game 16 is played?
No championships are what count in the end. Wins and losses are only so important you can go 16-0 every season but if you don't win the championship then you failed.
I'd rather win a championship than win every game during the season. I'd rather play good than win every game. You don't have to be 16-0 to be the best you have to play like the best and so far there are 2 teams that have played better then the perfect teams and the power rankings reflect it.
jimo if you have the time could you show us the points the top 4 teams are behind the Breakers?
So far we know:
Breakers-(-)
Louisville Baby Kittens-(-.6)
Texas Tarheels-(?)
Red Bank Thundercats-(?)
Appalachian Lycans-(?)
ajkj36
offline
offline
Originally posted by Aaddron
Originally posted by ajkj36
Austin first victim of the year. Next comment
No comment?:
Originally posted by ajkj36
Are they the two best teams? No one knows until the end
If that's true then why are you saying your one of the best? If no one knows who is then that includes you.
Originally posted by ajkj36
If you are going to quote me get it correct: Are they the two best teams? No one knows until the end, but for right now until someone beats us or Red Bank we are the tops in the 7.
Wins and losses are what counts in the end
So then according to what you said above the season end after game 16 is played?
I never said the season ended at 16 games, I said the end and the end is the championship.
Look all I am saying is this, we feel we are the best team in the west and so far our record shows that. Do you feel Austin is the best? Especially if the team that beat you is undefeated? This formula is putting a premium on margin of victory and that is just not a fair criteria because of the reasons I have given above(tactics, different game plans, getting backup more playing time...etc) The formula cant use strength of schedule because we all play the same teams except for one team from the east. There is a flaw somewhere thats all. Hell Red Bank may be number one we dont know, but because Austin and Louisville drill cupcakes by 200-0 and I beat them 150-0 then they are a better team? Not sure I agree with that. Just my last 2 cents.
Originally posted by ajkj36
Austin first victim of the year. Next comment
No comment?:
Originally posted by ajkj36
Are they the two best teams? No one knows until the end
If that's true then why are you saying your one of the best? If no one knows who is then that includes you.
Originally posted by ajkj36
If you are going to quote me get it correct: Are they the two best teams? No one knows until the end, but for right now until someone beats us or Red Bank we are the tops in the 7.
Wins and losses are what counts in the end
So then according to what you said above the season end after game 16 is played?
I never said the season ended at 16 games, I said the end and the end is the championship.
Look all I am saying is this, we feel we are the best team in the west and so far our record shows that. Do you feel Austin is the best? Especially if the team that beat you is undefeated? This formula is putting a premium on margin of victory and that is just not a fair criteria because of the reasons I have given above(tactics, different game plans, getting backup more playing time...etc) The formula cant use strength of schedule because we all play the same teams except for one team from the east. There is a flaw somewhere thats all. Hell Red Bank may be number one we dont know, but because Austin and Louisville drill cupcakes by 200-0 and I beat them 150-0 then they are a better team? Not sure I agree with that. Just my last 2 cents.
Last edited Oct 10, 2008 15:03:21
Aaddron
offline
offline
Originally posted by Aaddron
Are they the two best teams? No one knows until the end
If that's true then why are you saying your one of the best? If no one knows who is then that includes you.
Originally posted by ajkj36
If you are going to quote me get it correct: Are they the two best teams? No one knows until the end, but for right now until someone beats us or Red Bank we are the tops in the 7.
I did I just cut off the "but for right now..." but that just shows my point if no one knows who's the best then why did you declare yourselves one of the best?
Originally posted by ajkj36
I never said the season ended at 16 games, I said the end and the end is the championship.
Look all I am saying is this, we feel we are the best team in the west and so far our record shows that. Do you feel Austin is the best? Especially if the team that beat you is undefeated? This formula is putting a premium on margin of victory and that is just not a fair criteria because of the reasons I have given above(tactics, different game plans, getting backup more playing time...etc) The formula cant use strength of schedule because we all play the same teams except for one team from the east. There is a flaw somewhere thats all. Hell Red Bank may be number one we dont know, but because Austin and Louisville drill cupcakes by 200-0 and I beat them 150-0 then they are a better team? Not sure I agree with that. Just my last 2 cents.
I don't know I feel the Breakers are good but I can say who's the best at this point in the season. I agree about the cupcakes team as stated on the first page but I do believe the Breakers are a little better than the Tarheels AT THIS POINT:
Tarheels:
Chicago Whodat's-W 31-26
Amish Farmers-W 80-16
Phoenix Scorpions-W 73-23
Breakers:
Chicago Whodat's-W 42-16
Amish Farmers-W 70-17
Phoenix Scorpions-W 83-6
But its close. Figure out who's the best not by how they played each other but how they played other teams.
Ok I'm done continue if your wish.
Are they the two best teams? No one knows until the end
If that's true then why are you saying your one of the best? If no one knows who is then that includes you.
Originally posted by ajkj36
If you are going to quote me get it correct: Are they the two best teams? No one knows until the end, but for right now until someone beats us or Red Bank we are the tops in the 7.
I did I just cut off the "but for right now..." but that just shows my point if no one knows who's the best then why did you declare yourselves one of the best?
Originally posted by ajkj36
I never said the season ended at 16 games, I said the end and the end is the championship.
Look all I am saying is this, we feel we are the best team in the west and so far our record shows that. Do you feel Austin is the best? Especially if the team that beat you is undefeated? This formula is putting a premium on margin of victory and that is just not a fair criteria because of the reasons I have given above(tactics, different game plans, getting backup more playing time...etc) The formula cant use strength of schedule because we all play the same teams except for one team from the east. There is a flaw somewhere thats all. Hell Red Bank may be number one we dont know, but because Austin and Louisville drill cupcakes by 200-0 and I beat them 150-0 then they are a better team? Not sure I agree with that. Just my last 2 cents.
I don't know I feel the Breakers are good but I can say who's the best at this point in the season. I agree about the cupcakes team as stated on the first page but I do believe the Breakers are a little better than the Tarheels AT THIS POINT:
Tarheels:
Chicago Whodat's-W 31-26
Amish Farmers-W 80-16
Phoenix Scorpions-W 73-23
Breakers:
Chicago Whodat's-W 42-16
Amish Farmers-W 70-17
Phoenix Scorpions-W 83-6
But its close. Figure out who's the best not by how they played each other but how they played other teams.
Ok I'm done continue if your wish.
Last edited Oct 10, 2008 15:21:34
jimo2305
offline
offline
rofl some of y'all are taking this way outta proportion..
to whatever idiot up there was saying some hooplah about 'omg looka the records and we're still below.. obviously doesnt know how power rankings work..'
if power rankings were about records.. then whats the point of even looking at other factors..
the team on top only lost 1 game.. and guess who they lost to.. the tarheels..
those 200 point games on offense and shutouts on defense really helped their cause..
and on top of that.. earlier i noted it still surprised me how austin came up on top.. obviously it surprised u too.. then even you answered whyt hey came out ont op.. you said u were testing strategies against the cupcake teams and weren't intent on blowing them outta the water..
there's no way to measure amount of strategy being used.. sorry.. yea of course it's like the BCS.. these rankings take into amount the margin of victory, the amount of wins, the amount of poitns scored, the amount of points allowed, and the strength of teams faced before, being the heaviest weighted..
but hey.. who says you have to believe my power rankings? they're mine not yours.. read the title of the thread
to whatever idiot up there was saying some hooplah about 'omg looka the records and we're still below.. obviously doesnt know how power rankings work..'
if power rankings were about records.. then whats the point of even looking at other factors..
the team on top only lost 1 game.. and guess who they lost to.. the tarheels..
those 200 point games on offense and shutouts on defense really helped their cause..
and on top of that.. earlier i noted it still surprised me how austin came up on top.. obviously it surprised u too.. then even you answered whyt hey came out ont op.. you said u were testing strategies against the cupcake teams and weren't intent on blowing them outta the water..
there's no way to measure amount of strategy being used.. sorry.. yea of course it's like the BCS.. these rankings take into amount the margin of victory, the amount of wins, the amount of poitns scored, the amount of points allowed, and the strength of teams faced before, being the heaviest weighted..
but hey.. who says you have to believe my power rankings? they're mine not yours.. read the title of the thread
jimo2305
offline
offline
Originally posted by Atrain72
Originally posted by jimo2305
british accent: "ALMOST.. ALMOST.. ALMOST.. ERR, WE ARE" ... 'well done'
kudos to who can figure out where that quote's from
Family guy
lol yep on point
Originally posted by jimo2305
british accent: "ALMOST.. ALMOST.. ALMOST.. ERR, WE ARE" ... 'well done'
kudos to who can figure out where that quote's from
Family guy
lol yep on point
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
