Originally posted by matta
Projected Standings (remember, this thing seems to favor teams with weaker schedules, the bias decreases over time):
[U
14 . . The State of Texas Highwaymen . . ..2 . . 14 . . 0 . . ..13% . . .....16 . . 5,329
15 . . South Texas Skull Crushers . . ..0 . . 16 . . 0 . . ....0% . . .......0 . . 2,294
16 . . Michigan Rage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..0 . . 16 . . 0 . . ....0% . . .......0 . . 2,935
One thing I've always liked about these spread sheets, is the fact that they almost always pick 2 or more teams in the same conference to go winless, even though they play each other, at some point.
Projected Standings (remember, this thing seems to favor teams with weaker schedules, the bias decreases over time):
[U
14 . . The State of Texas Highwaymen . . ..2 . . 14 . . 0 . . ..13% . . .....16 . . 5,329
15 . . South Texas Skull Crushers . . ..0 . . 16 . . 0 . . ....0% . . .......0 . . 2,294
16 . . Michigan Rage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..0 . . 16 . . 0 . . ....0% . . .......0 . . 2,935
One thing I've always liked about these spread sheets, is the fact that they almost always pick 2 or more teams in the same conference to go winless, even though they play each other, at some point.






























