Originally posted by dontmeswidme
we aren't joining because you want to nerf our D-Line because you can't stop us
we aren't joining because you want to nerf our D-Line because you can't stop us
The Duff Man
offline
offline
Originally posted by GeneralMakaveli
No last year the team DDL face was boosted they beat us. Then went on to get beat by the football guys. We we have never lost to the football guys so i dont think we would have them. The best part tho, is once we boosted we played the team that beat use again and destroyed them.
I am not arguing your point, but to correct you we are 1-1 in two meetings. In before the "we weren't boosted in the loss"
No last year the team DDL face was boosted they beat us. Then went on to get beat by the football guys. We we have never lost to the football guys so i dont think we would have them. The best part tho, is once we boosted we played the team that beat use again and destroyed them.
I am not arguing your point, but to correct you we are 1-1 in two meetings. In before the "we weren't boosted in the loss"
PP
offline
offline
I singed GB up. No matter how you look at it, even if you don't GP at all, it's one more chance to see how your team and plays work against another great team. Seems foolish to pass up the chance, unless, of course, you actually care what other teams say if they beat you.
Judan
offline
offline
Originally posted by PP
I singed GB up. No matter how you look at it, even if you don't GP at all, it's one more chance to see how your team and plays work against another great team. Seems foolish to pass up the chance, unless, of course, you actually care what other teams say if they beat you.
DDL is having a big discussion over this. I, for one, don't feel like entering and consider it a waste of time whereas others want to. I also don't consider the teams in the tournament to be "great" teams. Some, sure. All? No way.
We're voting so we'll see.
I singed GB up. No matter how you look at it, even if you don't GP at all, it's one more chance to see how your team and plays work against another great team. Seems foolish to pass up the chance, unless, of course, you actually care what other teams say if they beat you.
DDL is having a big discussion over this. I, for one, don't feel like entering and consider it a waste of time whereas others want to. I also don't consider the teams in the tournament to be "great" teams. Some, sure. All? No way.
We're voting so we'll see.
Iktomi
offline
offline
After being discriminated against in last seasons "GLB T.O.C" because the "levels" of our players weren't sufficient enough to compete in your joke of tournament Doomsday would like to say kiss our collective asses.
Galkuris
offline
offline
Originally posted by PP
I singed GB up. No matter how you look at it, even if you don't GP at all, it's one more chance to see how your team and plays work against another great team. Seems foolish to pass up the chance, unless, of course, you actually care what other teams say if they beat you.
There is also the fact that every scrimmage game you play takes up some FP. If your going to use FP, you might as well gameplan in full. I'd rather not lump any more work on my coordinators. Thus, I say no to scrimmages.
I singed GB up. No matter how you look at it, even if you don't GP at all, it's one more chance to see how your team and plays work against another great team. Seems foolish to pass up the chance, unless, of course, you actually care what other teams say if they beat you.
There is also the fact that every scrimmage game you play takes up some FP. If your going to use FP, you might as well gameplan in full. I'd rather not lump any more work on my coordinators. Thus, I say no to scrimmages.
phthalatemagic
offline
offline
Originally posted by Galkuris
There is also the fact that every scrimmage game you play takes up some FP.
This is incorrect.
There is also the fact that every scrimmage game you play takes up some FP.
This is incorrect.
phthalatemagic
offline
offline
Originally posted by Doc
Originally posted by PP
I singed GB up. No matter how you look at it, even if you don't GP at all, it's one more chance to see how your team and plays work against another great team. Seems foolish to pass up the chance, unless, of course, you actually care what other teams say if they beat you.
DDL is having a big discussion over this. I, for one, don't feel like entering and consider it a waste of time whereas others want to. I also don't consider the teams in the tournament to be "great" teams. Some, sure. All? No way.
We're voting so we'll see.
I can understand, reputation bet-hedging-wise, why you wouldn't want to join
Originally posted by PP
I singed GB up. No matter how you look at it, even if you don't GP at all, it's one more chance to see how your team and plays work against another great team. Seems foolish to pass up the chance, unless, of course, you actually care what other teams say if they beat you.
DDL is having a big discussion over this. I, for one, don't feel like entering and consider it a waste of time whereas others want to. I also don't consider the teams in the tournament to be "great" teams. Some, sure. All? No way.
We're voting so we'll see.
I can understand, reputation bet-hedging-wise, why you wouldn't want to join
FairForever
offline
offline
Originally posted by phthalatemagic
Originally posted by Galkuris
There is also the fact that every scrimmage game you play takes up some FP.
This is incorrect.
Every scrimmage game after the second you play takes up some FP.
Originally posted by Galkuris
There is also the fact that every scrimmage game you play takes up some FP.
This is incorrect.
Every scrimmage game after the second you play takes up some FP.
brigmar
offline
offline
Originally posted by jrry32
Originally posted by brigmar
Originally posted by jrry32
Spamming IMOIt's an invite to a tourney FFS.Look up the definition of spamming.
Buy a fucking clue, and look up the definition of obsessed.
Let it go, because all it does is make you look childish.
Originally posted by brigmar
Originally posted by jrry32
Spamming IMOIt's an invite to a tourney FFS.Look up the definition of spamming.
Buy a fucking clue, and look up the definition of obsessed.
Let it go, because all it does is make you look childish.
phthalatemagic
offline
offline
Originally posted by FairForever
Originally posted by phthalatemagic
Originally posted by Galkuris
There is also the fact that every scrimmage game you play takes up some FP.
This is incorrect.
Every scrimmage game after the second you play takes up some FP.
This is correct.
Originally posted by phthalatemagic
Originally posted by Galkuris
There is also the fact that every scrimmage game you play takes up some FP.
This is incorrect.
Every scrimmage game after the second you play takes up some FP.
This is correct.
SteelersInsider
offline
offline
Originally posted by Galkuris
Originally posted by PP
I singed GB up. No matter how you look at it, even if you don't GP at all, it's one more chance to see how your team and plays work against another great team. Seems foolish to pass up the chance, unless, of course, you actually care what other teams say if they beat you.
There is also the fact that every scrimmage game you play takes up some FP. If your going to use FP, you might as well gameplan in full. I'd rather not lump any more work on my coordinators. Thus, I say no to scrimmages.
25 cents per game. Want me to send you a dollar? PM me your address.
Originally posted by PP
I singed GB up. No matter how you look at it, even if you don't GP at all, it's one more chance to see how your team and plays work against another great team. Seems foolish to pass up the chance, unless, of course, you actually care what other teams say if they beat you.
There is also the fact that every scrimmage game you play takes up some FP. If your going to use FP, you might as well gameplan in full. I'd rather not lump any more work on my coordinators. Thus, I say no to scrimmages.
25 cents per game. Want me to send you a dollar? PM me your address.
SteelersInsider
offline
offline
Originally posted by tmoon
After being discriminated against in last seasons "GLB T.O.C" because the "levels" of our players weren't sufficient enough to compete in your joke of tournament Doomsday would like to say kiss our collective asses.
I *still* never received your list of top 64 teams from last year.
Oh that's right, you didn't spend 20+ hours putting a list together. I had about 30 teams in addition to the 100 or so that were invited who were SURE they were top 64. So you tell me which of those 60+ teams were wrong about being top 64.
Most of the teams who didn't get in were 14-2 or 15-1 in the regular season. The ONLY thing that separated some teams was by level.
If you could think of a better way besides level, I asked you to suggest it last year and I didn't hear a darned thing.
So if you want to cry about it and lose another chance to play in the tournament to decide GLB's top teams, be my guest.
We don't need crybabies in the tournament anyway. If you wipe your tears away and still want to join, I won't hold it against you. I certainly had ZERO bias against your team before and I still don't have any bias against you despite your ill-informed post.
After being discriminated against in last seasons "GLB T.O.C" because the "levels" of our players weren't sufficient enough to compete in your joke of tournament Doomsday would like to say kiss our collective asses.
I *still* never received your list of top 64 teams from last year.
Oh that's right, you didn't spend 20+ hours putting a list together. I had about 30 teams in addition to the 100 or so that were invited who were SURE they were top 64. So you tell me which of those 60+ teams were wrong about being top 64.
Most of the teams who didn't get in were 14-2 or 15-1 in the regular season. The ONLY thing that separated some teams was by level.
If you could think of a better way besides level, I asked you to suggest it last year and I didn't hear a darned thing.
So if you want to cry about it and lose another chance to play in the tournament to decide GLB's top teams, be my guest.
We don't need crybabies in the tournament anyway. If you wipe your tears away and still want to join, I won't hold it against you. I certainly had ZERO bias against your team before and I still don't have any bias against you despite your ill-informed post.
Last edited Sep 28, 2008 17:22:56
Iktomi
offline
offline
Originally posted by SteelersInsider
Originally posted by tmoon
After being discriminated against in last seasons "GLB T.O.C" because the "levels" of our players weren't sufficient enough to compete in your joke of tournament Doomsday would like to say kiss our collective asses.
I *still* never received your list of top 64 teams from last year.
Oh that's right, you didn't spend 20+ hours putting a list together. I had about 30 teams in addition to the 100 or so that were invited who were SURE they were top 64. So you tell me which of those 60+ teams were wrong about being top 64.
Most of the teams who didn't get in were 14-2 or 15-1 in the regular season. The ONLY thing that separated some teams was by level.
If you could think of a better way besides level, I asked you to suggest it last year and I didn't hear a darned thing.
So if you want to cry about it and lose another chance to play in the tournament to decide GLB's top teams, be my guest.
We don't need crybabies in the tournament anyway. If you wipe your tears away and still want to join, I won't hold it against you. I certainly had ZERO bias against your team before and I still don't have any bias against you despite your ill-informed post.
Man I suppose all of the talk about you being a complete moron is true. No one here is crying about not being in a tournament you are begging Pro teams to join to try and give some credence to. Did the winners last year win anything? Hmmm... I don't suppose the winners of your tournament that you worked 20 hours on even made it to the AAA Championship game. Must of took some thought for that one. Wouldn't it have been easier to invited actual Champions to the tournament... oh wait if that happened your team wouldn't have gotten in. Don't tell me I am crying over something you are begging people to get into to try and give you and your questionable GM skills any legitimacy.
If you want help why don't you ask people that actually know something about this game instead of reaffirming your tired ass comments and even weaker competence.
Originally posted by tmoon
After being discriminated against in last seasons "GLB T.O.C" because the "levels" of our players weren't sufficient enough to compete in your joke of tournament Doomsday would like to say kiss our collective asses.
I *still* never received your list of top 64 teams from last year.
Oh that's right, you didn't spend 20+ hours putting a list together. I had about 30 teams in addition to the 100 or so that were invited who were SURE they were top 64. So you tell me which of those 60+ teams were wrong about being top 64.
Most of the teams who didn't get in were 14-2 or 15-1 in the regular season. The ONLY thing that separated some teams was by level.
If you could think of a better way besides level, I asked you to suggest it last year and I didn't hear a darned thing.
So if you want to cry about it and lose another chance to play in the tournament to decide GLB's top teams, be my guest.
We don't need crybabies in the tournament anyway. If you wipe your tears away and still want to join, I won't hold it against you. I certainly had ZERO bias against your team before and I still don't have any bias against you despite your ill-informed post.
Man I suppose all of the talk about you being a complete moron is true. No one here is crying about not being in a tournament you are begging Pro teams to join to try and give some credence to. Did the winners last year win anything? Hmmm... I don't suppose the winners of your tournament that you worked 20 hours on even made it to the AAA Championship game. Must of took some thought for that one. Wouldn't it have been easier to invited actual Champions to the tournament... oh wait if that happened your team wouldn't have gotten in. Don't tell me I am crying over something you are begging people to get into to try and give you and your questionable GM skills any legitimacy.
If you want help why don't you ask people that actually know something about this game instead of reaffirming your tired ass comments and even weaker competence.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
