Forum > Pro Leagues > If, for some reason, I cannot get it working or completed by the season's end, we may end up with certain players who are simply marked ineligible for league leader trophies.
Originally posted by Gart888 Originally posted by jamz
GoodGart888 who is an innocent young fella who just wants people to like him, and for people to think he's lulzy . For this evil cause he colluded with his alter ego BadGart888, who is a mean spirited boy who enjoys throwing games, and calling SI a British cigarette.
GoodGart888 seems like a much better dude. How can they separate them?
Originally posted by Gart888 Originally posted by jamz
GoodGart888 who is an innocent young fella who just wants people to like him, and for people to think he's lulzy . For this evil cause he colluded with his alter ego BadGart888, who is a mean spirited boy who enjoys throwing games, and calling SI a British cigarette.
GoodGart888 seems like a much better dude. How can they separate them?
Originally posted by jamz GoodGart888 who is an innocent young fella who just wants people to like him, and for people to think he's lulzy . For this evil cause he colluded with his alter ego BadGart888, who is a mean spirited boy who enjoys throwing games, and calling SI a British cigarette.
About the closest this would ever get to being collusion tbh
Originally posted by Gart888 Originally posted by jamz
GoodGart888 who is an innocent young fella who just wants people to like him, and for people to think he's lulzy . For this evil cause he colluded with his alter ego BadGart888, who is a mean spirited boy who enjoys throwing games, and calling SI a British cigarette.
GoodGart888 seems like a much better dude. How can they separate them?
If I could answer that question, I'd be a rich, rich man. Last time I tried to create a drug to solve multiple personality disorder, all I got was this blue pill that gave me a 4 hour erection.
I sold the formula to some jerk named Pfizer for 40.00 bucks, WHOS LAUGHING NOW PFIZER?
Originally posted by jrry32 Originally posted by Darth Asheme
Originally posted by jrry32
Fine, reworded. If Ksychicchchchchchc allowed gart reign over the AI for the explicit purpose of stat-padding for teh lulz, then, yes, that's collusion. Open, shut, put on the pink pantyhose and call Susan on the can phone.
But, since Ksychicchihihihichc gave gart reign over the AI for an entirely different purpose, and gart used it for something else, there is no collusion. Kyshciharmander might be complicit in the act of luzling, but is not guilty of colluding in any way, shape or form (in the shared reality version of life, anyway).
Except that is irrelevant Asheme, ksychic agreed to whatever Gart wanted to do with the AI when he gave them access. If I gave you the ability to release players from my team and you traded my entire team, they should not be traded because I did not agree to it and did not hire you for that reason, right(that's your logic)? Except the thing is, they are released because I agreed to any move you made when I gave you the ability to do it so whether or not that was my intention when hiring you is irrelevant because when I gave you those powers, I gave you my agreement to whatever thing you might do.
You're grasping at straws here.
So let's use your "business analogy".
I hire you to work the cash register. You start stealing cash from the register. So then, according to your logic, I should go to jail for you stealing.
Originally posted by Drago Everyday, a new smoke screen. Play the technicality card. Still collusion. I mean, if the actual definition of a word has become a technicality, then please just shoot me now.
Originally posted by kurieg Originally posted by jrry32
To allowing Gart to use the AI for any purpose.
No.
BFM was in the business of playing dotball. Ksychic gave Gart control of the AI for the purpose of playing dotball. Unless he actually knew what Gart was doing, Ksychic is not colluding with Gart.
That's irrelevant. It doesn't matter if he knew, he agreed to whatever Gart did when he gave him the power to do it. Otherwise the GMs who traded away every player on the team without an owner's approval couldn't do so because a trade can't be made unless both teams accept it.
Originally posted by MattyP Originally posted by jrry32
Originally posted by Darth Asheme
Originally posted by jrry32
Fine, reworded. If Ksychicchchchchchc allowed gart reign over the AI for the explicit purpose of stat-padding for teh lulz, then, yes, that's collusion. Open, shut, put on the pink pantyhose and call Susan on the can phone.
But, since Ksychicchihihihichc gave gart reign over the AI for an entirely different purpose, and gart used it for something else, there is no collusion. Kyshciharmander might be complicit in the act of luzling, but is not guilty of colluding in any way, shape or form (in the shared reality version of life, anyway).
Except that is irrelevant Asheme, ksychic agreed to whatever Gart wanted to do with the AI when he gave them access. If I gave you the ability to release players from my team and you traded my entire team, they should not be traded because I did not agree to it and did not hire you for that reason, right(that's your logic)? Except the thing is, they are released because I agreed to any move you made when I gave you the ability to do it so whether or not that was my intention when hiring you is irrelevant because when I gave you those powers, I gave you my agreement to whatever thing you might do.
You're grasping at straws here.
So let's use your "business analogy".
I hire you to work the cash register. You start stealing cash from the register. So then, according to your logic, I should go to jail for you stealing.
wat?
But did you say "great job stealing from me" in the police report?
Originally posted by MattyP You're grasping at straws here.
So let's use your "business analogy".
I hire you to work the cash register. You start stealing cash from the register. So then, according to your logic, I should go to jail for you stealing.
Originally posted by jrry32 Except that is irrelevant Asheme, ksychic agreed to whatever Gart wanted to do with the AI when he gave them access. If I gave you the ability to release players from my team and you traded my entire team, they should not be traded because I did not agree to it and did not hire you for that reason, right(that's your logic)? Except the thing is, they are released because I agreed to any move you made when I gave you the ability to do it so whether or not that was my intention when hiring you is irrelevant because when I gave you those powers, I gave you my agreement to whatever thing you might do.
Jesus. You realize you didn't use the word collusion above?