Warrior General Games

Originally posted by BengalDuck
Originally posted by Malachorn

Originally posted by reddogrw


tbh, it's only 2 games

is there another QB on the team?

I would think having a running QB AND a passing QB would be the ideal mix - make it very difficult for someone to game plan and exploit every weakness the defense has

If a QB showed to be more successful than a RB at running the ball then this would probably be true... but only if the game allowed for it to work that well. Without a QB1 and QB2 or something... probably not, tbh.

Falco was at 8.3, Baggins was at 8.5...

8.5 > 8.3 along a number line, sure, what the football difference is negligible.

The previous game, Baggins was about 2.2 instead of .2 ypc greater. But Falco was at 20. Again, 22.2 > 20 but when the numbers are that high, does it really matter?

IMHO you could argue that the QB, in limited data here, has shown to be equally as successful at running the ball.



People like Malachorn are limited in their thinking, don't try. They don't have foresight or courage to take risks.

They think rushing QBs should just spring up instantly and should dominate. Not realizing that what we are doing is trying something innovative that, in our opinion, will change the game of GLB. It has to start somewhere. My guess is that Bort is watching, and he is pleased that people are trying different things, and he would take that into account in upcoming changes. Afterall, things like this make the game less stagnant.

It is what we do, Cobra Kai, we try to make the game fun and interesting. While pissing people off at the same time of course.

People are jealous so they act pissed off IMO

Originally posted by sirallan
Mal why do you have that avatar?
srs question

For srs?
It's sorta my comment on all the other avatars out there with T&A and I'd like for people to think, at least subconsciously, about... certain things.

It's also, if we're being serious, a subtle attempt by me to show that our first impressions and what we may see at first should not not mean very much, of and by itself.

Originally posted by Malachorn
Originally posted by sirallan

Mal why do you have that avatar?
srs question

For srs?
It's sorta my comment on all the other avatars out there with T&A and I'd like for people to think, at least subconsciously, about... certain things.

It's also, if we're being serious, a subtle attempt by me to show that our first impressions and what we may see at first should not not mean very much, of and by itself.

But why so gay?

Okay.

Originally posted by Malachorn
Originally posted by sirallan

Mal why do you have that avatar?
srs question

For srs?
It's sorta my comment on all the other avatars out there with T&A and I'd like for people to think, at least subconsciously, about... certain things.

It's also, if we're being serious, a subtle attempt by me to show that our first impressions and what we may see at first should not not mean very much, of and by itself.

I dont like the avatar...plz change

Originally posted by Malachorn
Originally posted by Domer

First off YPC is not the be all end all stat to prove efficiency or effectiveness.

You rush Falco because the design of the QB run plays allows you to take advantage of a defense. Is that hard to understand? Both the timing of the play and the angles created to pursue the ball carrier are different for QB runs and HB runs. You can exploit weaknesses with one run that you can't with another. Watch some of the Kai game... The rushing QB my have a less YPC #, but he hits some pretty crucial plays and makes some very good runs.

Domer

I don't care enough to watch some Kai games, tbh.
I'd love for you to show me how a QB that typically runs for less yards, on average, than either of the RBs deserves to be running the ball.

I mean... on the average play, your QB runs for less yards than either RB.

Then this argument is done. If you don't watch the games you don't have a leg to stand on.

You continue to harp on YPC. It is false to assume YPC is THE indicator of effectiveness running the FB.

Let's step away from this game for a minute to ask you a simple question...

Two basketball players:

Player A - Averages 20,6 PPG
Player B - Averages 3.4 PPG

Who is more effective?

Domer

Originally posted by Skanker irl
People like Malachorn are limited in their thinking, don't try. They don't have foresight or courage to take risks.

They think rushing QBs should just spring up instantly and should dominate. Not realizing that what we are doing is trying something innovative that, in our opinion, will change the game of GLB. It has to start somewhere. My guess is that Bort is watching, and he is pleased that people are trying different things, and he would take that into account in upcoming changes. Afterall, things like this make the game less stagnant.

It is what we do, Cobra Kai, we try to make the game fun and interesting. While pissing people off at the same time of course.


Meh. I don't really agree with much of that, tbh.
I would say that "people like Malachorn" (who are you talking to in this post, by the way?) appreciate the sim well enough that they wouldn't feel the need to test some things out that make no sense and, based on their superiour knowledge, would almost certainly not yield favourable results.

Time is limited and trying to do such a thing as you're saying is great, IMO, would be a waste of my valuable time.
Just sayin'

Originally posted by Skanker irl

But why so gay?

I am sure he could have made it much more homosexual if he wanted.

Originally posted by Domer

Two basketball players:

Player A - Averages 20,6 PPG
Player B - Averages 3.4 PPG

Who is more effective?

Domer

Need more information to answer the question.

Originally posted by Domer
Originally posted by Malachorn

Originally posted by Domer


First off YPC is not the be all end all stat to prove efficiency or effectiveness.

You rush Falco because the design of the QB run plays allows you to take advantage of a defense. Is that hard to understand? Both the timing of the play and the angles created to pursue the ball carrier are different for QB runs and HB runs. You can exploit weaknesses with one run that you can't with another. Watch some of the Kai game... The rushing QB my have a less YPC #, but he hits some pretty crucial plays and makes some very good runs.

Domer

I don't care enough to watch some Kai games, tbh.
I'd love for you to show me how a QB that typically runs for less yards, on average, than either of the RBs deserves to be running the ball.

I mean... on the average play, your QB runs for less yards than either RB.

Then this argument is done. If you don't watch the games you don't have a leg to stand on.

You continue to harp on YPC. It is false to assume YPC is THE indicator of effectiveness running the FB.

Let's step away from this game for a minute to ask you a simple question...

Two basketball players:

Player A - Averages 20,6 PPG
Player B - Averages 3.4 PPG

Who is more effective?

Domer

Other stats tbh...20.6 points could be like Kevin Durant in OKC (he avgs 30+ now tho) and compared to Rondo who scores less I would say Rondo is more effective

Originally posted by Malachorn
Originally posted by Skanker irl

People like Malachorn are limited in their thinking, don't try. They don't have foresight or courage to take risks.

They think rushing QBs should just spring up instantly and should dominate. Not realizing that what we are doing is trying something innovative that, in our opinion, will change the game of GLB. It has to start somewhere. My guess is that Bort is watching, and he is pleased that people are trying different things, and he would take that into account in upcoming changes. Afterall, things like this make the game less stagnant.

It is what we do, Cobra Kai, we try to make the game fun and interesting. While pissing people off at the same time of course.


Meh. I don't really agree with much of that, tbh.
I would say that "people like Malachorn" (who are you talking to in this post, by the way?) appreciate the sim well enough that they wouldn't feel the need to test some things out that make no sense and, based on their superiour knowledge, would almost certainly not yield favourable results.

Time is limited and trying to do such a thing as you're saying is great, IMO, would be a waste of my valuable time.
Just sayin'

I was talking to BengalDuck, who I quoted. Again, you ask a lot of questions for someone with all the answers and superior knowledge

Your time limited and valuable, yet you have hours to spend bumping this epic thread. Interesting.

Originally posted by Skanker irl
But why so gay?

That's your reality and how you choose to see things, tbh?
And, FYI, it is NOT supposed to be "so gay."

It was taken from a calendar aimed at females.
It was not supposed to be a "gay calendar" or anything... it seems the gay community sorta enjoyed the pic.
There's a whole story, tbh.

So yeah, I like the pic.
And if you choose to see it as gay then that's on you, mate? That's the way you chose to see it and it says more about you than me, tbh.

Originally posted by sirallan
Originally posted by Domer


Two basketball players:

Player A - Averages 20,6 PPG
Player B - Averages 3.4 PPG

Who is more effective?

Domer

Need more information to answer the question.


BINGO...

And there's your answer to why run a QB when a HB has more YPC Malachom..Look deeper into the situation and you might learn something

Domer

Originally posted by sirallan
Originally posted by Skanker irl


But why so gay?

I am sure he could have made it much more homosexual if he wanted.


Meh...I would make a script to block him if it was more homo