Warrior General Games

Originally posted by jesusmp2000
Stats dont lie? Seems to me lhf's produced the better stats, all where on wl teams. So how is this thread still going on?

Like a carnival act that's rigged. His position at CB1 helps his performance because his DC almost never leaves him on an island. Obviously the DC has all the bases covered and wanted builds with catching and the lower speed while it won't help on running plays does seem to help place the CB in the right place for an INT or deflection.

Faster CBs with the same agility and vision don't stick their coverage in quite the same effectiveness. And while LHF's CB lag behind he usually has someone over the top. This equals success.

But the builds are still less then you would expect for a WL CB. In this situation less is out performing more.

Well ..sortof.

http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=1995376&pbp_id=9155419

But at least one of his CBs performs well. Just a matter of keeping his other two on special teams and off the field.

Originally posted by Social Assassin
Like a carnival act that's rigged. His position at CB1 helps his performance because his DC almost never leaves him on an island. Obviously the DC has all the bases covered and wanted builds with catching and the lower speed while it won't help on running plays does seem to help place the CB in the right place for an INT or deflection.

Faster CBs with the same agility and vision don't stick their coverage in quite the same effectiveness. And while LHF's CB lag behind he usually has someone over the top. This equals success.

But the builds are still less then you would expect for a WL CB. In this situation less is out performing more.

Well ..sortof.

http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=1995376&pbp_id=9155419

But at least one of his CBs performs well. Just a matter of keeping his other two on special teams and off the field.

The build is bad because it works well in the system it plays in. Your logic is amazing.

As for the link, you linked a non-man coverage CB giving up a TD on a 40 yard pass into double coverage. I can live with that.

Well to be honest the other CB was really on his own.

Originally posted by Longhornfan1024


As for the link, you linked a non-man coverage CB giving up a TD on a 40 yard pass into double coverage. I can live with that.

Ohh and btw. When you call a CB a non-man coverage dot that is because the build sucks. Making up a position for him doesn't fix the situation. Just like all LBs need to have some sort of coverage skills. He's not a SS or a LB.... it's a CB that gives up a pass almost every time there is one. That's a bad build that cost HOOD in the biggest way.

Originally posted by Social Assassin
Ohh and btw. When you call a CB a non-man coverage dot that is because the build sucks. Making up a position for him doesn't fix the situation. Just like all LBs need to have some sort of coverage skills. He's not a SS or a LB.... it's a CB that gives up a pass almost every time there is one. That's a bad build that cost HOOD in the biggest way.

No. It means he's a CB built to play similar to a safety in that he's built to stop the run and play pass support. As for giving up a pass almost every time, he gave up the pass less often than your CBs.

And 15 tackles 4 misses is him being active and effective in the running game?

While my coverage guys ...

one has 42 tackles and 5 missed and the other 33 tackles and 5 missed.

whatever.

http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=1800580 <--- lol. Maybe if they were faster they could tackle too!

http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=2157511 heres other cb, but yet , lhf's still produced better results/stats than all of ours , so regardless, his is better than all of ours, whichever way you want to look at it.

I think he has a better understanding of tactics then most people that have CBs. I just don't think he's a good builder.

Ohh and nice build. What I would expect to see in WL.

There's really no question that he doesn't cap or train efficiently.

Originally posted by Social Assassin
And 15 tackles 4 misses is him being active and effective in the running game?

While my coverage guys ...

one has 42 tackles and 5 missed and the other 33 tackles and 5 missed.

whatever.

http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=1800580 <--- lol. Maybe if they were faster they could tackle too!

This post shows how you don't understand this game. lol.

Originally posted by Social Assassin
I think he has a better understanding of tactics then most people that have CBs. I just don't think he's a good builder.

Ohh and nice build. What I would expect to see in WL.

This post shows how you don't understand this game. lol.

Originally posted by jdbolick
There's really no question that he doesn't cap or train efficiently.

There's really no question that my CBs are better than yours.

Originally posted by jesusmp2000
http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=2157511 heres other cb, but yet , lhf's still produced better results/stats than all of ours , so regardless, his is better than all of ours, whichever way you want to look at it.

jesus has the sexies.

Originally posted by jdbolick
There's really no question that he doesn't cap or train efficiently.

http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=1800580

Completely obvious.

Originally posted by Social Assassin
http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=1800580

Completely obvious.

lol linking a CB that's two seasons older than the rest and that was built under a different system. This post just shows how you don't understand the game.

LHF's cb's are almost as good as mine.