I'm going to go back in and finish building more players. I'll come back once I have tried the playbook stuff.
Forum > Goal Line Blitz > Goal Line Blitz 2 - Alpha Testing Information - Q&A
bhall43
offline
offline
Originally posted by Dub J
From what I'm reading here...
GLB 2.0 is going to be the exact same thing as GLB. Same networks, same people on the inside, same bullshit.
Maybe a true PvP game would have been the way to go to shake things up.
i dont know why you thought that would be different? fortunately though everyone is on an even level of not knowing optimal builds or team make up though so your network could really be of no use.
From what I'm reading here...
GLB 2.0 is going to be the exact same thing as GLB. Same networks, same people on the inside, same bullshit.
Maybe a true PvP game would have been the way to go to shake things up.
i dont know why you thought that would be different? fortunately though everyone is on an even level of not knowing optimal builds or team make up though so your network could really be of no use.
daryls61
offline
offline
Originally posted by Time Trial
I'm going to go back in and finish building more players. I'll come back once I have tried the playbook stuff.
What is training like? Are their attribute caps?
I'm going to go back in and finish building more players. I'll come back once I have tried the playbook stuff.
What is training like? Are their attribute caps?
mike_hart10
offline
offline
Originally posted by phrog
43 man roster? that seems silly
I agree. Even the NFL has 53 man rosters. Even at a bare minimum, 43 doesn't leave much room for ST's.
Offense:
QB - 1
HB - 2
FB - 1
O-Line - 10
TE - 2 or 3
WR - 5
Total: 21 - 22
Defense:
DT - 3 or 4
DE - 4
LB - 5 or 6
CB - 5
SS - 2
FS - 2
Total: 21 - 23
So already, you're at 42 - 45....and that's without a K and a P. Not to mention a KR/PR
43 man roster? that seems silly
I agree. Even the NFL has 53 man rosters. Even at a bare minimum, 43 doesn't leave much room for ST's.
Offense:
QB - 1
HB - 2
FB - 1
O-Line - 10
TE - 2 or 3
WR - 5
Total: 21 - 22
Defense:
DT - 3 or 4
DE - 4
LB - 5 or 6
CB - 5
SS - 2
FS - 2
Total: 21 - 23
So already, you're at 42 - 45....and that's without a K and a P. Not to mention a KR/PR
F8n4tune
offline
offline
Not saying build totally balanced either but this speed thing has to go. As a paying customer I want to be able to do something different than everyone else. You go all speed then there needs to be penalty to that in another area of the build.
Originally posted by bhall43
word to the wise...speed kills no matter what engine you run...even real life.
The attributes get more expensive pretty quickly. At least from a quick glance, maxing one attribute seems super counter intuitive with this setup. Again, with a quick glance, it appears that builds will be more balanced.
word to the wise...speed kills no matter what engine you run...even real life.
The attributes get more expensive pretty quickly. At least from a quick glance, maxing one attribute seems super counter intuitive with this setup. Again, with a quick glance, it appears that builds will be more balanced.
Homage
offline
offline
Originally posted by F8n4tune
Wow man really ? I'll sweep the insult under the rug just posting that shows you have no comprehension. maybe I may have worded it wrong ? If all you have is speed then you can't do something else , doesn't work like that in this game and that's what needs to change. There has to be choices in a build , none of this just punch it to the max and then do something else. Is that clearer ?
You clearly haven't seen a WL build then. I mean holy fuck you're wrong.
But that's not a surprise. You've been bitching about the same shit for years now...
Wow man really ? I'll sweep the insult under the rug just posting that shows you have no comprehension. maybe I may have worded it wrong ? If all you have is speed then you can't do something else , doesn't work like that in this game and that's what needs to change. There has to be choices in a build , none of this just punch it to the max and then do something else. Is that clearer ?
You clearly haven't seen a WL build then. I mean holy fuck you're wrong.
But that's not a surprise. You've been bitching about the same shit for years now...
Originally posted by Homage
Are you retarded? Do you not realize how fast even the biggest guys in the NFL are?
And it's already been shown that the build process is entirely different. ALG's are a thing of the past...
so us math nerds will have to figure out other ways to destroy you girlies.
feel free to teach me early. i still dont know how to play glb tbh.
Are you retarded? Do you not realize how fast even the biggest guys in the NFL are?
And it's already been shown that the build process is entirely different. ALG's are a thing of the past...
so us math nerds will have to figure out other ways to destroy you girlies.
feel free to teach me early. i still dont know how to play glb tbh.
Homage
offline
offline
Originally posted by InRomoWeTrust
The attributes get more expensive pretty quickly. At least from a quick glance, maxing one attribute seems super counter intuitive with this setup. Again, with a quick glance, it appears that builds will be more balanced.
I don't think he said max it.
The attributes get more expensive pretty quickly. At least from a quick glance, maxing one attribute seems super counter intuitive with this setup. Again, with a quick glance, it appears that builds will be more balanced.
I don't think he said max it.
Originally posted by mike_hart10
I agree. Even the NFL has 53 man rosters. Even at a bare minimum, 43 doesn't leave much room for ST's.
Offense:
QB - 1
HB - 2
FB - 1
O-Line - 10
TE - 2 or 3
WR - 5
Total: 21 - 22
Defense:
DT - 3 or 4
DE - 4
LB - 5 or 6
CB - 5
SS - 2
FS - 2
Total: 21 - 23
So already, you're at 42 - 45....and that's without a K and a P. Not to mention a KR/PR
NFL has 45 active on gameday.
I agree. Even the NFL has 53 man rosters. Even at a bare minimum, 43 doesn't leave much room for ST's.
Offense:
QB - 1
HB - 2
FB - 1
O-Line - 10
TE - 2 or 3
WR - 5
Total: 21 - 22
Defense:
DT - 3 or 4
DE - 4
LB - 5 or 6
CB - 5
SS - 2
FS - 2
Total: 21 - 23
So already, you're at 42 - 45....and that's without a K and a P. Not to mention a KR/PR
NFL has 45 active on gameday.
Dub J
offline
offline
Originally posted by bhall43
fortunately though everyone is on an even level of not knowing optimal builds or team make up though so your network could really be of no use.
lol
Let's drop the silly charade.
fortunately though everyone is on an even level of not knowing optimal builds or team make up though so your network could really be of no use.
lol
Let's drop the silly charade.
Homage
offline
offline
Originally posted by ProfessionalKop
feel free to teach me early. i still dont know how to play glb tbh.
soon enough
feel free to teach me early. i still dont know how to play glb tbh.
soon enough
Originally posted by Homage
I don't think he said max it.
Right, I'm just saying that I don't think one attribute will dominate in this new GLB
I don't think he said max it.
Right, I'm just saying that I don't think one attribute will dominate in this new GLB
Greg B
offline
offline
To say a network is of no use is crazy bhall. You put a network up against your average user and I think it's safe to say that the network will figure stuff out a heck of a lot faster then that average joe (unless he's bort). I do agree people will *start* off on an even playing field, but certain networks will make that not last very long at all. Especially the networks that have thousands upon thousands of flex to burn through every sort of build imaginable.
Networks = the suck
Networks = the suck
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
