Warrior General Games

Originally posted by Corndog
GLB2 currently has more active users than GLB Classic.

I may be just a bitter former mod, but I do recall some people predicting this....

Originally posted by Hazeee
I may be just a bitter former mod, but I do recall some people predicting this...

Doesn't exactly take Nostradamus to predict that the majority of people will prefer an easy to pick up intuitive game over a hardcore counterintuitive version of the same game.

There'll always be a subsection of people who prefer the latter, though. If the former existing makes it possible for the latter to continue existing, it seems pretty silly for the latter to hate the former.

Originally posted by Saris
by making it mind numbingly simple.

if it's so simple, I invite you to attempt to overtake my #1 global ladder ranking.

In other words...http://stagevu.com/img/thumbnail/ynmypzthknaebig.jpg

Originally posted by Corndog
By which accounts? The people in the GLB Classic dedicated private forums that you're part of, that are just as biased as you?

GLB2 has brought in several thousand users, whether those are new or old customers who quit GLB Classic because they were bored. GLB2 currently has more active users than GLB Classic.

The idea that GLB2 is a monumental failure only exists in your head.

It looks like I hit a nerve. Nothing you said shows that whatever new customers GL2 has brought in wouldn't have joined GLB1. And even if it has brought it some new users, you're spending money to run a game (how much do they pay for your salary?) that appeals to a substantially similar customer base when that same money could have been spent to create and a game aimed towards a different customer base. So, as I pointed out in my post, what euchrid claimed doesn't make sense.

And you should probably get your facts straight before getting your panties in a twist. If you even took the time to look, you'd see that I play GLB2. I also never said that it's a monumental failure. I enjoy the game, but think WG should have created a different game.

Originally posted by Corndog
There'll always be a subsection of people who prefer the latter, though. If the former existing makes it possible for the latter to continue existing, it seems pretty silly for the latter to hate the former.

Never understood the hate of paying customers in "pay to win" online games. Those "wallet warriors" keep the lights on. There is no game otherwise.

This is such a silly thread..............

ur face is silly

Originally posted by Dub J
ur face is silly



Is this your first thing done since he ban lifted?

It would seem to be that way

Could someone do a timeline of GLB and call it the Rise and Fall of GLB1... you know include important events for example Catch22 or the abandonment of GLB1... that be nice.

Originally posted by BrownVelvet
Could someone do a timeline of GLB and call it the Rise and Fall of GLB1... you know include important events for example Catch22 or the abandonment of GLB1... that be nice.

a ham and cheese sandwich would be nice

Originally posted by BrownVelvet
Could someone do a timeline of GLB and call it the Rise and Fall of GLB1... you know include important events for example Catch22 or the abandonment of GLB1... that be nice.

Oh, that would be interesting.

Could also compare it side by side to other games that came out in 2008, like the first Mass Effect, a Guitar Hero game, or Warhammer Online.

Originally posted by Corndog
Oh, that would be interesting.

Could also compare it side by side to other games that came out in 2008, like the first Mass Effect, a Guitar Hero game, or Warhammer Online.

Mass Effect... what a great game.