You're just not a good builder, dude. In fact, you really suck for someone who has played the game as long as you have. It's nice that being slow actually helped your performance due to Bort's awful coverage code, but even then you could have achieved much higher scores in vision & jumping than you have if you were simply better at building. You just don't understand how to cap or train efficiently, which is why your player value sucks on every dot you've ever made.
Originally posted by jdbolick
You're just not a good builder, dude. In fact, you really suck for someone who has played the game as long as you have. It's nice that being slow actually helped your performance due to Bort's awful coverage code, but even then you could have achieved much higher scores in vision & jumping than you have if you were simply better at building. You just don't understand how to cap or train efficiently, which is why your player value sucks on every dot you've ever made.
lol. You've got nothing but EL and I've already proven that to be a false indicator of dot quality. My dots are built better than yours and perform better than yours. You just can't handle that I build better dots than you. You blame their high performance on "Bort's awful coverage code," but you can't explain how my CBs have outperformed yours for all 27 seasons of this game.
You're just not a good builder, dude. In fact, you really suck for someone who has played the game as long as you have. It's nice that being slow actually helped your performance due to Bort's awful coverage code, but even then you could have achieved much higher scores in vision & jumping than you have if you were simply better at building. You just don't understand how to cap or train efficiently, which is why your player value sucks on every dot you've ever made.
lol. You've got nothing but EL and I've already proven that to be a false indicator of dot quality. My dots are built better than yours and perform better than yours. You just can't handle that I build better dots than you. You blame their high performance on "Bort's awful coverage code," but you can't explain how my CBs have outperformed yours for all 27 seasons of this game.
jdbolick
offline
offline
Originally posted by Longhornfan1024
lol. You've got nothing but EL and I've already proven that to be a false indicator of dot quality.
Player value isn't everything, but it does mean a lot which is why the best teams are usually top 5 in player value. Look at MPHD. Is that a false indicator of dot quality? You just can't admit that you're extremely inefficient in player building because you have to pretend that you're the greatest at everything, just like when you embarrassed yourself by pretending to be a legal expert.
Originally posted by
You just can't handle that I build better dots than you.
There are people who build better dots than me. Not many, but some. You are not one of them and there's no one on GLB besides you who thinks you are.
Originally posted by
you can't explain how my CBs have outperformed yours for all 27 seasons of this game.
Besides the fact that they haven't? As others have pointed out, you keep only talking about one of your CBs because he's the only one who had a good season.
lol. You've got nothing but EL and I've already proven that to be a false indicator of dot quality.
Player value isn't everything, but it does mean a lot which is why the best teams are usually top 5 in player value. Look at MPHD. Is that a false indicator of dot quality? You just can't admit that you're extremely inefficient in player building because you have to pretend that you're the greatest at everything, just like when you embarrassed yourself by pretending to be a legal expert.Originally posted by
You just can't handle that I build better dots than you.
There are people who build better dots than me. Not many, but some. You are not one of them and there's no one on GLB besides you who thinks you are.
Originally posted by
you can't explain how my CBs have outperformed yours for all 27 seasons of this game.
Besides the fact that they haven't? As others have pointed out, you keep only talking about one of your CBs because he's the only one who had a good season.
jdbolick
offline
offline
I mean, who had the best pass defense in the WL this season? And who built 7 of the 11 dots for that pass defense? That's pretty much case closed.
Originally posted by jdbolick
Player value isn't everything, but it does mean a lot which is why the best teams are usually top 5 in player value. Look at MPHD. Is that a false indicator of dot quality? You just can't admit that you're extremely inefficient in player building because you have to pretend that you're the greatest at everything, just like when you embarrassed yourself by pretending to be a legal expert.
You admit that player value isn't everything, yet you have no argument to use that your dots are better than mine.
Originally posted by jdbolick
There are people who build better dots than me. Not many, but some. You are not one of them and there's no one on GLB besides you who thinks you are.
The performance of my dots versus the performance of your dots proves otherwise. I'm better than you.
Originally posted by jdbolick
Besides the fact that they haven't? As others have pointed out, you keep only talking about one of your CBs because he's the only one who had a good season.
Nice comeback.
Me: My dots have done better than yours, here is the evidence.
You: No they haven't.
As for my other CBs, comparing their performance (which was still very good) to the performance of man CBs is about as valid of a comparison as comparing a kick returner to a man CB. They are built to play a different style and are used differently by the DC. Your argument means nothing, as usual.
Originally posted by jdbolick
I mean, who had the best pass defense in the WL this season? And who built 7 of the 11 dots for that pass defense? That's pretty much case closed.
Hood gave up the fewest points per game. Points are what matters. And I've already proven that my CBs are far superior to yours in pass defense stats. lol referring to team-wide stats because I've already won with individual stats.
Player value isn't everything, but it does mean a lot which is why the best teams are usually top 5 in player value. Look at MPHD. Is that a false indicator of dot quality? You just can't admit that you're extremely inefficient in player building because you have to pretend that you're the greatest at everything, just like when you embarrassed yourself by pretending to be a legal expert.
You admit that player value isn't everything, yet you have no argument to use that your dots are better than mine.
Originally posted by jdbolick
There are people who build better dots than me. Not many, but some. You are not one of them and there's no one on GLB besides you who thinks you are.
The performance of my dots versus the performance of your dots proves otherwise. I'm better than you.
Originally posted by jdbolick
Besides the fact that they haven't? As others have pointed out, you keep only talking about one of your CBs because he's the only one who had a good season.
Nice comeback.
Me: My dots have done better than yours, here is the evidence.
You: No they haven't.
As for my other CBs, comparing their performance (which was still very good) to the performance of man CBs is about as valid of a comparison as comparing a kick returner to a man CB. They are built to play a different style and are used differently by the DC. Your argument means nothing, as usual.
Originally posted by jdbolick
I mean, who had the best pass defense in the WL this season? And who built 7 of the 11 dots for that pass defense? That's pretty much case closed.
Hood gave up the fewest points per game. Points are what matters. And I've already proven that my CBs are far superior to yours in pass defense stats. lol referring to team-wide stats because I've already won with individual stats. jdbolick
offline
offline
You haven't proven anything, you've just reinforced this pitiable image people have of you where you're completely out of touch with reality and have to construct this elaborate illusion where you're the best even though no one else thinks you are. Furthermore, you've been spending too much time with Kai because sending PMs and then blocking the person you sent them to is a real pussy move. Kudos on showing your true colors.
Originally posted by jdbolick
You haven't proven anything, you've just reinforced this pitiable image people have of you where you're completely out of touch with reality and have to construct this elaborate illusion where you're the best even though no one else thinks you are. Furthermore, you've been spending too much time with Kai because sending PMs and then blocking the person you sent them to is a real pussy move. Kudos on showing your true colors.
u mad?
And I've proven exactly what I set out to prove. I've used nothing but facts to point out that my CBs out perform yours. They have better individual stats, are on a higher ranked team, and their team has given up the fewest points per game of any team in WL. All you can resort to is EL, but even you admit it doesn't mean everything. A real evaluation of build quality is on-the-field performance, and my CBs far outstrip yours in that regards. Just say it "LHF builds better CBs than me." and I'm sure you'll feel much better. Admittance is the first step to recovery.
You haven't proven anything, you've just reinforced this pitiable image people have of you where you're completely out of touch with reality and have to construct this elaborate illusion where you're the best even though no one else thinks you are. Furthermore, you've been spending too much time with Kai because sending PMs and then blocking the person you sent them to is a real pussy move. Kudos on showing your true colors.
u mad?
And I've proven exactly what I set out to prove. I've used nothing but facts to point out that my CBs out perform yours. They have better individual stats, are on a higher ranked team, and their team has given up the fewest points per game of any team in WL. All you can resort to is EL, but even you admit it doesn't mean everything. A real evaluation of build quality is on-the-field performance, and my CBs far outstrip yours in that regards. Just say it "LHF builds better CBs than me." and I'm sure you'll feel much better. Admittance is the first step to recovery.
mandyross
offline
offline
Originally posted by jdbolick
sending PMs and then blocking the person you sent them to is a real pussy move.
I'm not sure you can claim any kind of PM integrity, with the kind of deranged vitriolic crap that you fire out!
Apart from that ... carry on in here. Very interesting.
sending PMs and then blocking the person you sent them to is a real pussy move.
I'm not sure you can claim any kind of PM integrity, with the kind of deranged vitriolic crap that you fire out!
Apart from that ... carry on in here. Very interesting.
jdbolick
offline
offline
Originally posted by mandyross
I'm not sure you can claim any kind of PM integrity, with the kind of deranged vitriolic crap that you fire out! Apart from that ... carry on in here. Very interesting.
Why are you still acting like you even have the right to interact with me? Please achieve some kind of relevance before ever posting to or about me.
I'm not sure you can claim any kind of PM integrity, with the kind of deranged vitriolic crap that you fire out! Apart from that ... carry on in here. Very interesting.
Why are you still acting like you even have the right to interact with me? Please achieve some kind of relevance before ever posting to or about me.
mandyross
offline
offline
When people develop an ego about an online game, you know that there is something seriously wrong with them.
Guys, this is what a real CB's stats should look like
http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=2203861&playoffs=0
http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=2203861&playoffs=0
Originally posted by Sithas~Cult~
Guys, this is what a real CB's stats should look like
http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=2203861&playoffs=0
Regional pro has no place in this discussion. If you want to do that, look at my CBs Season 24 stats: 31 receptions allowed on 160 targets, 93 PDs, 22 INTs, and 1 FF.
Originally posted by jdbolick
Why are you still acting like you even have the right to interact with me? Please achieve some kind of relevance before ever posting to or about me.
Nice 8 receptions allowed on that awesome CB of yours. lol.
Guys, this is what a real CB's stats should look like
http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=2203861&playoffs=0
Regional pro has no place in this discussion. If you want to do that, look at my CBs Season 24 stats: 31 receptions allowed on 160 targets, 93 PDs, 22 INTs, and 1 FF.
Originally posted by jdbolick
Why are you still acting like you even have the right to interact with me? Please achieve some kind of relevance before ever posting to or about me.
Nice 8 receptions allowed on that awesome CB of yours. lol.
Originally posted by Longhornfan1024
End of season update:
YMXI:
35 % target to reception allowed ratio, making a play (INT, PD, or KL) on 49% of targets, has 4 INTs, and 5 missed tackles as a CB1 on a 3rd place WL alpha team.
Social Assassin's CBs:
1. Golden: 62 % ratio, making a play on 29% of targets, 0 INTs, and 5 missed tackles as a CB2 on a 12th place WL alpha team.
2. Cheeks: 55% ratio, making a play on 39% of targets, 0 INTs, and 5 missed tackle as a CB2 on a 12th place WL alpha team.
Bolick's CBs:
1. Roark: 47% ratio, play on 33% of targets, 0 INTs, and 6 missed tackles as a CB1 on a 4th place WL zeta team.
2. Third: 60% ratio, play on 35% of targets, 0 INTs, and 7 missed tackles as a CB3 on a 4th place zeta team.
So by all objective measurements, my man CB is far superior to both SA and jd's man CBs. He has a better target to reception allowed ratio, makes plays on more passes, has more INTs, and has the same or fewer missed tackles compared to the other CBs. He also is on the top ranked team of the three. I guess we can now put this debate to rest.
Stats dont lie? Seems to me lhf's produced the better stats, all where on wl teams. SO how is this thread still going on?
End of season update:
YMXI:
35 % target to reception allowed ratio, making a play (INT, PD, or KL) on 49% of targets, has 4 INTs, and 5 missed tackles as a CB1 on a 3rd place WL alpha team.
Social Assassin's CBs:
1. Golden: 62 % ratio, making a play on 29% of targets, 0 INTs, and 5 missed tackles as a CB2 on a 12th place WL alpha team.
2. Cheeks: 55% ratio, making a play on 39% of targets, 0 INTs, and 5 missed tackle as a CB2 on a 12th place WL alpha team.
Bolick's CBs:
1. Roark: 47% ratio, play on 33% of targets, 0 INTs, and 6 missed tackles as a CB1 on a 4th place WL zeta team.
2. Third: 60% ratio, play on 35% of targets, 0 INTs, and 7 missed tackles as a CB3 on a 4th place zeta team.
So by all objective measurements, my man CB is far superior to both SA and jd's man CBs. He has a better target to reception allowed ratio, makes plays on more passes, has more INTs, and has the same or fewer missed tackles compared to the other CBs. He also is on the top ranked team of the three. I guess we can now put this debate to rest.
Stats dont lie? Seems to me lhf's produced the better stats, all where on wl teams. SO how is this thread still going on?
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
