I like this. One thing that I have been thinking as I have been reading this thread, is how much more fun this will be as the seasons progress. Think about it if I have a C/NT I am not going to touch blocking or tackling in the first season because I want things that I'll use on both sides of the ball STR/AGI/VIS/SPD etc. but then around season 2-4 I will have to decide should I pump blocking or tackling or a little of both?
Skvan
offline
offline
Count me in. If I would be all over this and would for sure buy another team if I could have one of these and my current team.
Guppy, Inc
offline
offline
this would be the single biggest thing in GLB history.
ironman...ironman...ironman
ironman...ironman...ironman
TJ Spikes
offline
offline
Originally posted by Guppy, Inc
this would be the single biggest thing in GLB history.
ironman...ironman...ironman
+1
this would be the single biggest thing in GLB history.
ironman...ironman...ironman
+1
We_Rule
offline
offline
Originally posted by Guppy, Inc
this would be the single biggest thing in GLB history.
ironman...ironman...ironman
Um, no it wouldn't. Not that it is a bad idea, just a very small percentage would be on-board. Not to mention that it would most likely be implemeted poorly as history has shown........
On a side note, if we would all get our act together as one voice to GET THEM TO FIX THE GAPING HOLES IN THE SIM versus suggesting (again) to add more "fluff" items like this, then we might really have something here, and implementing things like this for those who want it would be relatively easy. Until then, I will personally vote A RESOUNDING NO on anything and everything that is not a direct fix to the several messed up areas that we have now.
this would be the single biggest thing in GLB history.
ironman...ironman...ironman
Um, no it wouldn't. Not that it is a bad idea, just a very small percentage would be on-board. Not to mention that it would most likely be implemeted poorly as history has shown........
On a side note, if we would all get our act together as one voice to GET THEM TO FIX THE GAPING HOLES IN THE SIM versus suggesting (again) to add more "fluff" items like this, then we might really have something here, and implementing things like this for those who want it would be relatively easy. Until then, I will personally vote A RESOUNDING NO on anything and everything that is not a direct fix to the several messed up areas that we have now.
Loganrobert85
offline
offline
+1 count me in
really like this idea
limit the roster size down to like 20 or so, make quarters less as long, shorten the field. why not?
definitely has my attention.
epic?
really like this idea
limit the roster size down to like 20 or so, make quarters less as long, shorten the field. why not?
definitely has my attention.
epic?
Originally posted by Loganrobert85
+1 count me in
really like this idea
limit the roster size down to like 20 or so, make quarters less as long, shorten the field. why not?
definitely has my attention.
epic?
The current proposal keeps all the rules of football the same, all the sim quirks and constructs intact, and simply calls for limiting the roster size to 15.
In no way do I support shortening the field or the quarters or changing the game in any meaningful way.
+1 count me in
really like this idea
limit the roster size down to like 20 or so, make quarters less as long, shorten the field. why not?
definitely has my attention.
epic?
The current proposal keeps all the rules of football the same, all the sim quirks and constructs intact, and simply calls for limiting the roster size to 15.
In no way do I support shortening the field or the quarters or changing the game in any meaningful way.
Guppy, Inc
offline
offline
Originally posted by We_Rule
Originally posted by Guppy, Inc
this would be the single biggest thing in GLB history.
ironman...ironman...ironman
Um, no it wouldn't. Not that it is a bad idea, just a very small percentage would be on-board. Not to mention that it would most likely be implemeted poorly as history has shown........
On a side note, if we would all get our act together as one voice to GET THEM TO FIX THE GAPING HOLES IN THE SIM versus suggesting (again) to add more "fluff" items like this, then we might really have something here, and implementing things like this for those who want it would be relatively easy. Until then, I will personally vote A RESOUNDING NO on anything and everything that is not a direct fix to the several messed up areas that we have now.
you hit on one important thing here, GLB should be able to work on more than 1 idea at a time. Unless the sim is just horribly coded, this should be a very simple thing to implement.
Originally posted by Guppy, Inc
this would be the single biggest thing in GLB history.
ironman...ironman...ironman
Um, no it wouldn't. Not that it is a bad idea, just a very small percentage would be on-board. Not to mention that it would most likely be implemeted poorly as history has shown........
On a side note, if we would all get our act together as one voice to GET THEM TO FIX THE GAPING HOLES IN THE SIM versus suggesting (again) to add more "fluff" items like this, then we might really have something here, and implementing things like this for those who want it would be relatively easy. Until then, I will personally vote A RESOUNDING NO on anything and everything that is not a direct fix to the several messed up areas that we have now.
you hit on one important thing here, GLB should be able to work on more than 1 idea at a time. Unless the sim is just horribly coded, this should be a very simple thing to implement.
Originally posted by Guppy, Inc
Originally posted by We_Rule
Originally posted by Guppy, Inc
this would be the single biggest thing in GLB history.
ironman...ironman...ironman
Um, no it wouldn't. Not that it is a bad idea, just a very small percentage would be on-board. Not to mention that it would most likely be implemeted poorly as history has shown........
On a side note, if we would all get our act together as one voice to GET THEM TO FIX THE GAPING HOLES IN THE SIM versus suggesting (again) to add more "fluff" items like this, then we might really have something here, and implementing things like this for those who want it would be relatively easy. Until then, I will personally vote A RESOUNDING NO on anything and everything that is not a direct fix to the several messed up areas that we have now.
you hit on one important thing here, GLB should be able to work on more than 1 idea at a time. Unless the sim is just horribly coded, this should be a very simple thing to implement.
And the goal is to make this idea simple enough that it won't take away from efforts to improve the game.
Originally posted by We_Rule
Originally posted by Guppy, Inc
this would be the single biggest thing in GLB history.
ironman...ironman...ironman
Um, no it wouldn't. Not that it is a bad idea, just a very small percentage would be on-board. Not to mention that it would most likely be implemeted poorly as history has shown........
On a side note, if we would all get our act together as one voice to GET THEM TO FIX THE GAPING HOLES IN THE SIM versus suggesting (again) to add more "fluff" items like this, then we might really have something here, and implementing things like this for those who want it would be relatively easy. Until then, I will personally vote A RESOUNDING NO on anything and everything that is not a direct fix to the several messed up areas that we have now.
you hit on one important thing here, GLB should be able to work on more than 1 idea at a time. Unless the sim is just horribly coded, this should be a very simple thing to implement.
And the goal is to make this idea simple enough that it won't take away from efforts to improve the game.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
