Warrior General Games

Originally posted by Malachorn
Originally posted by Domer

Here's an answer...

If the Defense can't stop it, why go "two dimensional"? What's the point in that exactly?

Domer


Tea Baggins averaged more YPC than your QB in BOTH games.
Why run with the QB when it was less effective than running with your RB in BOTH games?

This, by the way, is the crux of my argument.
I've yet to see ANY evidence that running with a QB, as opposed to a RB that is 'supposed' to run, is a great idea (I actually think the way the sim currently works it almost begs it to be known that it CAN NOT be a good idea).

Originally posted by Malachorn
Originally posted by Domer

Here's an answer...

If the Defense can't stop it, why go "two dimensional"? What's the point in that exactly?

Domer


Tea Baggins averaged more YPC than your QB in BOTH games.
Why run with the QB when it was less effective than running with your RB in BOTH games?

For someone who seems to have all the answers and steer people in the right direction, you sure do ask a lot of questions.

The answer to this one is painfully obvious.

Originally posted by Malachorn
Originally posted by Domer

Here's an answer...

If the Defense can't stop it, why go "two dimensional"? What's the point in that exactly?

Domer


Tea Baggins averaged more YPC than your QB in BOTH games.
Why run with the QB when it was less effective than running with your RB in BOTH games?

JSS has done better than Tea tbh (In terms of YPC)

Originally posted by BengalDuck
Originally posted by Malachorn

Originally posted by Domer


Here's an answer...

If the Defense can't stop it, why go "two dimensional"? What's the point in that exactly?

Domer


Tea Baggins averaged more YPC than your QB in BOTH games.
Why run with the QB when it was less effective than running with your RB in BOTH games?


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diminishing_returns

Good Call

I must admit that when one Cobra Kai starts patting himself on the back the rest of his little friends come running to his defense - I think 1/2 the posters in this thread have a player on the team

looks like many of their same "look at me" threads in the SA Pro forum

Originally posted by reddogrw
I must admit that when one Cobra Kai starts patting himself on the back the rest of his little friends come running to his defense - I think 1/2 the posters in this thread have a player on the team

looks like many of their same "look at me" threads in the SA Pro forum

Can't help it if we have such an active team.

I think what is really sad is that the other 1/2 of the posts in this thread are from Malanewb

Originally posted by BengalDuck
Originally posted by Malachorn

Originally posted by Domer


Here's an answer...

If the Defense can't stop it, why go "two dimensional"? What's the point in that exactly?

Domer


Tea Baggins averaged more YPC than your QB in BOTH games.
Why run with the QB when it was less effective than running with your RB in BOTH games?


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diminishing_returns

Are you suggesting that you I actually meant that you could only run with either your starting RB or your starting QB? Obviously, I realise that this is not the case.

Originally posted by Nuge20
JSS has done better than Tea tbh (In terms of YPC)

Yes, the "other" RB has actually had a better YPC than either Tea Baggins or Shane Falco... in BOTH games.
The real point is that it seems that running with RBs seems to be more effective than running with QBs.

So... why have a guy that can't pass and lose so much on that ability instead of getting another RB or FB to help carry the load? Wouldn't it seem, from your 2 games, to suggest that the QB has no business running and is less effective than RBs?
So... shouldn't that suggest they should be built to pass?

Originally posted by Skanker irl
Can't help it if we have such an active team.

I think what is really sad is that the other 1/2 of the posts in this thread are from Malanewb

I think it's sad that, with all the people that play this game, there doesn't seem to be anyone that is capable of offering a good argument for why QBs should be built to run in this game, as it currently works.

Basically:
What has your 2 games taught us?
It's capable to run well in this game and it might not be a bad idea to have a run-focused team.

The QB doesn't really need to be running the ball, however.
(I just think that THAT is a more sensible way to be looking at things here).

Originally posted by Malachorn

So... shouldn't that suggest they should be built to pass?


Falco. averages 11.6 YPC.

You know any QBs average above that Y/A?

That is the point of having him built to rush.

Originally posted by Malachorn
Originally posted by BengalDuck

Originally posted by Malachorn


Originally posted by Domer



Here's an answer...

If the Defense can't stop it, why go "two dimensional"? What's the point in that exactly?

Domer


Tea Baggins averaged more YPC than your QB in BOTH games.
Why run with the QB when it was less effective than running with your RB in BOTH games?


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diminishing_returns

Are you suggesting that you I actually meant that you could only run with either your starting RB or your starting QB? Obviously, I realise that this is not the case.

Originally posted by Nuge20

JSS has done better than Tea tbh (In terms of YPC)

Yes, the "other" RB has actually had a better YPC than either Tea Baggins or Shane Falco... in BOTH games.
The real point is that it seems that running with RBs seems to be more effective than running with QBs.

So... why have a guy that can't pass and lose so much on that ability instead of getting another RB or FB to help carry the load? Wouldn't it seem, from your 2 games, to suggest that the QB has no business running and is less effective than RBs?
So... shouldn't that suggest they should be built to pass?



Level 36 vs. Level 49 tbh

Originally posted by Skanker irl
Originally posted by Malachorn


So... shouldn't that suggest they should be built to pass?


Falco. averages 11.6 YPC.

You know any QBs average above that Y/A?

That is the point of having him built to rush.
cosign

Originally posted by Skanker irl
Originally posted by Malachorn


So... shouldn't that suggest they should be built to pass?


Falco. averages 11.6 YPC.

You know any QBs average above that Y/A?

That is the point of having him built to rush.

Terrible argument and the worst kind of logic, tbh.

Originally posted by Nuge20
Originally posted by Malachorn

Originally posted by BengalDuck


Originally posted by Malachorn



Originally posted by Domer




Here's an answer...

If the Defense can't stop it, why go "two dimensional"? What's the point in that exactly?

Domer


Tea Baggins averaged more YPC than your QB in BOTH games.
Why run with the QB when it was less effective than running with your RB in BOTH games?


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diminishing_returns

Are you suggesting that you I actually meant that you could only run with either your starting RB or your starting QB? Obviously, I realise that this is not the case.

Originally posted by Nuge20


JSS has done better than Tea tbh (In terms of YPC)

Yes, the "other" RB has actually had a better YPC than either Tea Baggins or Shane Falco... in BOTH games.
The real point is that it seems that running with RBs seems to be more effective than running with QBs.

So... why have a guy that can't pass and lose so much on that ability instead of getting another RB or FB to help carry the load? Wouldn't it seem, from your 2 games, to suggest that the QB has no business running and is less effective than RBs?
So... shouldn't that suggest they should be built to pass?



Level 36 vs. Level 49 tbh

FINALLY, you make a very valid point.

I make valid points frequently but thanks for recognizing that my argument made sense