Originally posted by reddogrw
I only had 1 in the original equation, which was
Relevance = (100*(your current personal relevancy factor) - (Pallow Posting coefficient)^(# of Pallow posts))
but if Pallow does not post, something would still get reduced
100 x 5 - 10^0 would be the equation
500 - 1 = 499, so every thread would always have the Pallow coefficient taken away
If it was:
(100) x (5) - (10)³
Which is removing the first (# of Pallow Posts) it would be a ridiculous irrelevancy product so your equation was correct.
Originally posted by reddogrw
Relevance = as far as the relevance of scale works, I don't know the numbers, but I would think it would be in this order
Bort
Catch 22
Pallow
(any other admin)
Ellis Bell
Digital Daggers
I think there is also a snarkiness factor added in when DD posts and Bort's is more random so perhaps the equation is also a little different for others
I mean, is 1-100, 1-10, on the relevancy scale, or the R scale.
So Bort would be a R100 and Catch is a R99?
I only had 1 in the original equation, which was
Relevance = (100*(your current personal relevancy factor) - (Pallow Posting coefficient)^(# of Pallow posts))
but if Pallow does not post, something would still get reduced
100 x 5 - 10^0 would be the equation
500 - 1 = 499, so every thread would always have the Pallow coefficient taken away
If it was:
(100) x (5) - (10)³
Which is removing the first (# of Pallow Posts) it would be a ridiculous irrelevancy product so your equation was correct.
Originally posted by reddogrw
Relevance = as far as the relevance of scale works, I don't know the numbers, but I would think it would be in this order
Bort
Catch 22
Pallow
(any other admin)
Ellis Bell
Digital Daggers
I think there is also a snarkiness factor added in when DD posts and Bort's is more random so perhaps the equation is also a little different for others
I mean, is 1-100, 1-10, on the relevancy scale, or the R scale.
So Bort would be a R100 and Catch is a R99?
