We .....no...... forget....... about...... dis..... here...... issue 
It's not that I don't want this... but here's the thing. Just how are you going to "fix" it? We have dots from various seasons that have very different build platforms (as GLB has changed HOW dots get built more than once)... rules that have been changed as well... and stats that exist now that did not exist several seasons ago. How do we go about correctly ranking players when the playing fields are so different? Unless that issue is resolved correctly... for everyone to agree upon such corrections... then it's just a nice idea with no wheels.
Originally posted by Theo Wizzago
It's not that I don't want this... but here's the thing. Just how are you going to "fix" it? We have dots from various seasons that have very different build platforms (as GLB has changed HOW dots get built more than once)... rules that have been changed as well... and stats that exist now that did not exist several seasons ago. How do we go about correctly ranking players when the playing fields are so different? Unless that issue is resolved correctly... for everyone to agree upon such corrections... then it's just a nice idea with no wheels.
#1 is establishing a Hall of Fame Committee to redo it and update it as needed...see OP for instructions how to go about it
It's not that I don't want this... but here's the thing. Just how are you going to "fix" it? We have dots from various seasons that have very different build platforms (as GLB has changed HOW dots get built more than once)... rules that have been changed as well... and stats that exist now that did not exist several seasons ago. How do we go about correctly ranking players when the playing fields are so different? Unless that issue is resolved correctly... for everyone to agree upon such corrections... then it's just a nice idea with no wheels.
#1 is establishing a Hall of Fame Committee to redo it and update it as needed...see OP for instructions how to go about it
Greg B
offline
offline
Originally posted by Team Nucleus
#1 is establishing a Hall of Fame Committee to redo it and update it as needed...see OP for instructions how to go about it
Wouldn't that include all 20 active members of GLB? O_o
#1 is establishing a Hall of Fame Committee to redo it and update it as needed...see OP for instructions how to go about it
Wouldn't that include all 20 active members of GLB? O_o
Chessey
offline
offline
Originally posted by Greg B
Wouldn't that include all 20 active members of GLB? O_o
there is easily 1000+ active agents. most people just don't post much.though that doesn't mean they don't know anything about this game.
Wouldn't that include all 20 active members of GLB? O_o
there is easily 1000+ active agents. most people just don't post much.though that doesn't mean they don't know anything about this game.
High Demand
offline
offline
Originally posted by Chessey
there is easily 1000+ active agents. most people just don't post much.though that doesn't mean they don't know anything about this game.
Perfect....lets get err done.
there is easily 1000+ active agents. most people just don't post much.though that doesn't mean they don't know anything about this game.
Perfect....lets get err done.
Edited by High Demand on Jan 14, 2013 02:07:52
Greg B
offline
offline
If people don't post though, then there is no way you can call them active. Who wants to play with people who don't say a word? Isn't that the problem around here already?
Greg B
offline
offline
Originally posted by Team Nucleus
Should be easy enough to get a HOF Committee together.
I would hate to see the 3 year process for that committee.
Should be easy enough to get a HOF Committee together.
I would hate to see the 3 year process for that committee.
High Demand
offline
offline
Originally posted by Greg B
If people don't post though, then there is no way you can call them active. Who wants to play with people who don't say a word? Isn't that the problem around here already?
Don't need to post to correct the Hall of Fame tab.
If people don't post though, then there is no way you can call them active. Who wants to play with people who don't say a word? Isn't that the problem around here already?
Don't need to post to correct the Hall of Fame tab.
Originally posted by Greg B
I would hate to see the 3 year process for that committee.
Thats what needs to change alone with some of the induction requirements such as retired players only for 1
I would hate to see the 3 year process for that committee.
Thats what needs to change alone with some of the induction requirements such as retired players only for 1
Originally posted by Team Nucleus
Should be easy enough to get a HOF Committee together.
You could do a committee but after that committee snubbed a few people players then there would be a witch hunt and then no one would take that committee seriously. you forget this is a online game and there are some very crappy built players that some people think should be H.O.F players that just aren't worthy. and if you were honest and told them that then all of a sudden you have a bunch of mad people.
I am not saying the HoF doesn't need some work because it does. but a committee of the membership of GLB isn't the answer.
Should be easy enough to get a HOF Committee together.
You could do a committee but after that committee snubbed a few people players then there would be a witch hunt and then no one would take that committee seriously. you forget this is a online game and there are some very crappy built players that some people think should be H.O.F players that just aren't worthy. and if you were honest and told them that then all of a sudden you have a bunch of mad people.
I am not saying the HoF doesn't need some work because it does. but a committee of the membership of GLB isn't the answer.
Greg B
offline
offline
Originally posted by hatchman
You could do a committee but after that committee snubbed a few people players then there would be a witch hunt and then no one would take that committee seriously. you forget this is a online game and there are some very crappy built players that some people think should be H.O.F players that just aren't worthy. and if you were honest and told them that then all of a sudden you have a bunch of mad people.
I am not saying the HoF doesn't need some work because it does. but a committee of the membership of GLB isn't the answer.
Not to mention all of the players that absolutely stat padded over the seasons. Who would want to go through all of that to determine legit stats?
You could do a committee but after that committee snubbed a few people players then there would be a witch hunt and then no one would take that committee seriously. you forget this is a online game and there are some very crappy built players that some people think should be H.O.F players that just aren't worthy. and if you were honest and told them that then all of a sudden you have a bunch of mad people.
I am not saying the HoF doesn't need some work because it does. but a committee of the membership of GLB isn't the answer.
Not to mention all of the players that absolutely stat padded over the seasons. Who would want to go through all of that to determine legit stats?
Originally posted by Greg B
Originally posted by hatchman
You could do a committee but after that committee snubbed a few people players then there would be a witch hunt and then no one would take that committee seriously. you forget this is a online game and there are some very crappy built players that some people think should be H.O.F players that just aren't worthy. and if you were honest and told them that then all of a sudden you have a bunch of mad people.
I am not saying the HoF doesn't need some work because it does. but a committee of the membership of GLB isn't the answer.
Not to mention all of the players that absolutely stat padded over the seasons. Who would want to go through all of that to determine legit stats?
another good example of why a committtee isn't the answer.
Originally posted by hatchman
You could do a committee but after that committee snubbed a few people players then there would be a witch hunt and then no one would take that committee seriously. you forget this is a online game and there are some very crappy built players that some people think should be H.O.F players that just aren't worthy. and if you were honest and told them that then all of a sudden you have a bunch of mad people.
I am not saying the HoF doesn't need some work because it does. but a committee of the membership of GLB isn't the answer.
Not to mention all of the players that absolutely stat padded over the seasons. Who would want to go through all of that to determine legit stats?
another good example of why a committtee isn't the answer.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
