User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Page:
 
kr0n
offline
Link
 
WW: 3rd Overall, 6th Pass D, 7th Rush D, +17 Turnover Ratio
SDL: 22nd Overall, 30th Pass D, 24th Rush D, +9 Turnover Ratio
Compton: 8th Overall, 27th Pass D, 8th Rush D, +16 Turnover Ratio
GBM: 6th Overall, 14th Pass D, 6th Rush D, +1 Turnover Ratio
 
da raiders
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Luzod
Originally posted by lawdawg95

Originally posted by GoVikings16


Hey da raiders,

Sorry for not gameplanning every game. We overlooked a game (some of us have lives) and our offense was extremely predictable while our defense was still gear towards MEM. But keep thinking we suck, we'd love to meet you in the playoffs.


Ahh the ever famous "we didn't game plan" excuse.


I don't think we used this excuse. However, one thing is for sure, GoVikings don't EVER gameplan.


you used it.
 
lawdawg95
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by kr0n
WW: 3rd Overall, 6th Pass D, 7th Rush D, +17 Turnover Ratio
SDL: 22nd Overall, 30th Pass D, 24th Rush D, +9 Turnover Ratio
Compton: 8th Overall, 27th Pass D, 8th Rush D, +16 Turnover Ratio
GBM: 6th Overall, 14th Pass D, 6th Rush D, +1 Turnover Ratio


Are those turnover ratio numbers with or without the Spicewood game?
 
kr0n
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by lawdawg95
Originally posted by kr0n

WW: 3rd Overall, 6th Pass D, 7th Rush D, +17 Turnover Ratio
SDL: 22nd Overall, 30th Pass D, 24th Rush D, +9 Turnover Ratio
Compton: 8th Overall, 27th Pass D, 8th Rush D, +16 Turnover Ratio
GBM: 6th Overall, 14th Pass D, 6th Rush D, +1 Turnover Ratio


Are those turnover ratio numbers with or without the Spicewood game?


with

i didnt look up the numbers and went by what the script said <_<

compton is the only one who didnt play spicewood though
 
lawdawg95
offline
Link
 
Damn, I knew we probably had a good turnover ratio but we're at +39 by my calculations. Of course that counts Spicewood.
 
kr0n
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by lawdawg95
Damn, I knew we probably had a good turnover ratio but we're at +39 by my calculations. Of course that counts Spicewood.


+33 on my script

MEM is #1 with +39
 
lawdawg95
offline
Link
 
42 FumRec +23 INTs = 65 Turnovers caused

8 Fumbles lost + 18 INTs = 26 turnovers


That's how I got a +39 turnover ratio. That's going over the Conference Stats
 
kr0n
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by lawdawg95
42 FumRec +23 INTs = 65 Turnovers caused

8 Fumbles lost + 18 INTs = 26 turnovers


That's how I got a +39 turnover ratio. That's going over the Conference Stats

you sure some of those fumble recoveries aren't from recovering your own teams fumbles?
Edited by kr0n on May 20, 2009 16:02:13
 
Bladnach
offline
Link
 
Alpine is 1st in FGs


lawldawg. Why don't you just get that script it's pretty easy to run
 
cavalier
Alpine
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by chronoaug
Alpine is 1st in FGs


Difficult to beat 24 out of 24

 
Galkuris
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by kr0n
Originally posted by lawdawg95

42 FumRec +23 INTs = 65 Turnovers caused

8 Fumbles lost + 18 INTs = 26 turnovers


That's how I got a +39 turnover ratio. That's going over the Conference Stats

you sure some of those fumble recoveries aren't from recovering your own teams fumbles?


6 are, so +33 turnover ratio

Still pretty dang good.
 
kr0n
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Galkuris
Originally posted by kr0n

Originally posted by lawdawg95


42 FumRec +23 INTs = 65 Turnovers caused

8 Fumbles lost + 18 INTs = 26 turnovers


That's how I got a +39 turnover ratio. That's going over the Conference Stats

you sure some of those fumble recoveries aren't from recovering your own teams fumbles?


6 are, so +33 turnover ratio

Still pretty dang good.


yeah, just making sure the +33 turnover ratio on the script i got was correct
 
lawdawg95
offline
Link
 
Seems a little odd that they count those as fumble "recoveries" but I stand corrected.
 
da raiders
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Luzod
Originally posted by da raiders

Originally posted by GoVikings16


Hey da raiders,

Sorry for not gameplanning every game. We overlooked a game (some of us have lives) and our offense was extremely predictable while our defense was still gear towards MEM. But keep thinking we suck, we'd love to meet you in the playoffs.


you ensured yourselves of no home playoff games. nice job.


You are certainly wrong, good job again!


whoops.....
 
Luzod
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by da raiders
Originally posted by Luzod

Originally posted by da raiders


Originally posted by GoVikings16



Hey da raiders,

Sorry for not gameplanning every game. We overlooked a game (some of us have lives) and our offense was extremely predictable while our defense was still gear towards MEM. But keep thinking we suck, we'd love to meet you in the playoffs.


you ensured yourselves of no home playoff games. nice job.


You are certainly wrong, good job again!


whoops.....


? Hey da raiders, how is your team going? Oh yeah, you had to gut because it sucked. I'm sorry for ya =/
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.