Dunno if this has been asked - are tiers for teams going to be similar? Like by age?
Forum > Goal Line Blitz > Goal Line Blitz 2 - Alpha Testing Information - Q&A
daryls61
offline
offline
Originally posted by Time Trial
I'd need to see the training system. In GLB1, the ALGs meant that you couldn't just hoard/spend SP to maximize training gains throughout the build. While many of the "training gain to SP Value" sweet spots are actually fairly deep into the build, one of the initial worries about doing away with ALGs was that it simply changed the ideal build to one that opened with a ton of SAs.
I didn't consider that. Without AGL's agents would wait until they reached plateau and then apply all their SP's. Hopefully Bort figured out a way to avoid that and make it so agents want to apply SP's right away.
I'd need to see the training system. In GLB1, the ALGs meant that you couldn't just hoard/spend SP to maximize training gains throughout the build. While many of the "training gain to SP Value" sweet spots are actually fairly deep into the build, one of the initial worries about doing away with ALGs was that it simply changed the ideal build to one that opened with a ton of SAs.
I didn't consider that. Without AGL's agents would wait until they reached plateau and then apply all their SP's. Hopefully Bort figured out a way to avoid that and make it so agents want to apply SP's right away.
Originally posted by daryls61
Originally posted by Time Trial
I'd need to see the training system. In GLB1, the ALGs meant that you couldn't just hoard/spend SP to maximize training gains throughout the build. While many of the "training gain to SP Value" sweet spots are actually fairly deep into the build, one of the initial worries about doing away with ALGs was that it simply changed the ideal build to one that opened with a ton of SAs.
I didn't consider that. Without AGL's agents would wait until they reached plateau and then apply all their SP's. Hopefully Bort figured out a way to avoid that and make it so agents want to apply SP's right away.
if there is no advantage for waiting to apply SP, why would anyone do that?
without ALGs its just less complicated for the casual user to just stumble across the game and start playing.
Originally posted by Time Trial
I'd need to see the training system. In GLB1, the ALGs meant that you couldn't just hoard/spend SP to maximize training gains throughout the build. While many of the "training gain to SP Value" sweet spots are actually fairly deep into the build, one of the initial worries about doing away with ALGs was that it simply changed the ideal build to one that opened with a ton of SAs.
I didn't consider that. Without AGL's agents would wait until they reached plateau and then apply all their SP's. Hopefully Bort figured out a way to avoid that and make it so agents want to apply SP's right away.
if there is no advantage for waiting to apply SP, why would anyone do that?
without ALGs its just less complicated for the casual user to just stumble across the game and start playing.
Time Trial
offline
offline
Originally posted by daryls61
I didn't consider that. Without AGL's agents would wait until they reached plateau and then apply all their SP's. Hopefully Bort figured out a way to avoid that and make it so agents want to apply SP's right away.
Well, there are training gains to be had by applying SPs. If you took away ALGs and then intense trained the same attribute for 10 seasons and then spent all your SPs, that attribute would be lower than if you spent SPs to cap the attribute throughout the build in order to maximize training gains.
I didn't consider that. Without AGL's agents would wait until they reached plateau and then apply all their SP's. Hopefully Bort figured out a way to avoid that and make it so agents want to apply SP's right away.
Well, there are training gains to be had by applying SPs. If you took away ALGs and then intense trained the same attribute for 10 seasons and then spent all your SPs, that attribute would be lower than if you spent SPs to cap the attribute throughout the build in order to maximize training gains.
Originally posted by Time Trial
Well, there are training gains to be had by applying SPs. If you took away ALGs and then intense trained the same attribute for 10 seasons and then spent all your SPs, that attribute would be lower than if you spent SPs to cap the attribute throughout the build in order to maximize training gains.
What if training was like ALGs in GLB:TNG?
Well, there are training gains to be had by applying SPs. If you took away ALGs and then intense trained the same attribute for 10 seasons and then spent all your SPs, that attribute would be lower than if you spent SPs to cap the attribute throughout the build in order to maximize training gains.
What if training was like ALGs in GLB:TNG?
Time Trial
offline
offline
Originally posted by DigitalDaggers
What if training was like ALGs in GLB:TNG?
Training ignores SP caps, but slowly gets weaker over the life of the build?
What if training was like ALGs in GLB:TNG?
Training ignores SP caps, but slowly gets weaker over the life of the build?
Originally posted by Time Trial
Training ignores SP caps, but slowly gets weaker over the life of the build?
...ALGs are gone in GLB:TNG...
Training ignores SP caps, but slowly gets weaker over the life of the build?
...ALGs are gone in GLB:TNG...
Originally posted by DigitalDaggers
...ALGs are gone in GLB:TNG...
That makes me sad
...ALGs are gone in GLB:TNG...
That makes me sad
MoJames
offline
offline
Originally posted by DigitalDaggers
What if training was like ALGs in GLB:TNG?
So the forums will only have 3 new emoticons?
What if training was like ALGs in GLB:TNG?
So the forums will only have 3 new emoticons?
Originally posted by rivergato
Math is dead
http://www.amazon.com/The-Mathematics-Life-Ian-Stewart/dp/0465032400
Math is dead
http://www.amazon.com/The-Mathematics-Life-Ian-Stewart/dp/0465032400
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
