Originally posted by WiSeIVIaN
The fact that your "best team ever" is 9-5 and you are using chemistry as an excuse is lolz. Your total chem gets averaged with your O/D chem to give true chem on that side of the ball. As of today your effective offensive chemistry is 96.5 and your defensive chemistry is 99. So 00.1% on defense attributes and 00.35% on offensive attributes. Blaming chemistry rather than coordinating for losses like this is retarded. Did it have a nonzero effect on your game? Of course. But the effect of dots, the effect of coordinators, is 1000x the impact with no exaggeration.
I mean you guys are losing to 9-5 pro teams in scrims, which don't take into account chemistry. Time to find a better scapegoat? Or you could always, you know, own up to the fact that you got beat because of things you can control (dots and gameplanning). Tho technically the decision to have a huge roster turnaround and trash your chemistry is something you controlled as well, but I digress.
Needless to say, then you say GG then blame chem, you are not only incorrectly taking the blame away from people controlling things on your squad, but you are also implying that the other team would have lost if you had better chem, which is both insulting and inaccurate.
tldr: stop blaming chemistry noob
thanks for your concern. I see us having made the playoffs. See you in da ship.
The fact that your "best team ever" is 9-5 and you are using chemistry as an excuse is lolz. Your total chem gets averaged with your O/D chem to give true chem on that side of the ball. As of today your effective offensive chemistry is 96.5 and your defensive chemistry is 99. So 00.1% on defense attributes and 00.35% on offensive attributes. Blaming chemistry rather than coordinating for losses like this is retarded. Did it have a nonzero effect on your game? Of course. But the effect of dots, the effect of coordinators, is 1000x the impact with no exaggeration.
I mean you guys are losing to 9-5 pro teams in scrims, which don't take into account chemistry. Time to find a better scapegoat? Or you could always, you know, own up to the fact that you got beat because of things you can control (dots and gameplanning). Tho technically the decision to have a huge roster turnaround and trash your chemistry is something you controlled as well, but I digress.
Needless to say, then you say GG then blame chem, you are not only incorrectly taking the blame away from people controlling things on your squad, but you are also implying that the other team would have lost if you had better chem, which is both insulting and inaccurate.
tldr: stop blaming chemistry noob
thanks for your concern. I see us having made the playoffs. See you in da ship.






























