GG Axis. ST came up big for us right before the second half.
Forum > Regional Minor Leagues > North American Pro League > North American Pro League S31 GG Thread
Luzod
offline
offline
Originally posted by Homage
GG CORE, fuck u chem
Your chemestry is almost full, wtf you talking about?
GG CORE, fuck u chem
Your chemestry is almost full, wtf you talking about?
Homage
offline
offline
Originally posted by Luzod
Your chemestry is almost full, wtf you talking about?
Still a near 1% dropoff on all of our players. That's like a Mini Helmet. u dumb?
Your chemestry is almost full, wtf you talking about?
Still a near 1% dropoff on all of our players. That's like a Mini Helmet. u dumb?
King of Bling
offline
offline
Originally posted by Homage
Still a near 1% dropoff on all of our players. That's like a Mini Helmet. u dumb?
And yet you've mini'd your opponents twice. We're still not 100% but chem is part of the game bro, just happens sometimes.
Still a near 1% dropoff on all of our players. That's like a Mini Helmet. u dumb?
And yet you've mini'd your opponents twice. We're still not 100% but chem is part of the game bro, just happens sometimes.
Homage
offline
offline
Originally posted by King of Bling
And yet you've mini'd your opponents twice. We're still not 100% but chem is part of the game bro, just happens sometimes.
Cool analysis.
And yet you've mini'd your opponents twice. We're still not 100% but chem is part of the game bro, just happens sometimes.
Cool analysis.
King of Bling
offline
offline
Originally posted by Homage
Cool analysis.
Baby it's cold outside http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bp3UoqOkFJo
Cool analysis.
Baby it's cold outside http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bp3UoqOkFJo
Edited by King of Bling on Nov 10, 2012 20:19:41
WiSeIVIaN
offline
offline
Originally posted by Homage
Still a near 1% dropoff on all of our players. That's like a Mini Helmet. u dumb?
The fact that your "best team ever" is 9-5 and you are using chemistry as an excuse is lolz. Your total chem gets averaged with your O/D chem to give true chem on that side of the ball. As of today your effective offensive chemistry is 96.5 and your defensive chemistry is 99. So 00.1% on defense attributes and 00.35% on offensive attributes. Blaming chemistry rather than coordinating for losses like this is retarded. Did it have a nonzero effect on your game? Of course. But the effect of dots, the effect of coordinators, is 1000x the impact with no exaggeration.
I mean you guys are losing to 9-5 pro teams in scrims, which don't take into account chemistry. Time to find a better scapegoat? Or you could always, you know, own up to the fact that you got beat because of things you can control (dots and gameplanning). Tho technically the decision to have a huge roster turnaround and trash your chemistry is something you controlled as well, but I digress.
Needless to say, then you say GG then blame chem, you are not only incorrectly taking the blame away from people controlling things on your squad, but you are also implying that the other team would have lost if you had better chem, which is both insulting and inaccurate.
tldr: stop blaming chemistry noob
Still a near 1% dropoff on all of our players. That's like a Mini Helmet. u dumb?
The fact that your "best team ever" is 9-5 and you are using chemistry as an excuse is lolz. Your total chem gets averaged with your O/D chem to give true chem on that side of the ball. As of today your effective offensive chemistry is 96.5 and your defensive chemistry is 99. So 00.1% on defense attributes and 00.35% on offensive attributes. Blaming chemistry rather than coordinating for losses like this is retarded. Did it have a nonzero effect on your game? Of course. But the effect of dots, the effect of coordinators, is 1000x the impact with no exaggeration.
I mean you guys are losing to 9-5 pro teams in scrims, which don't take into account chemistry. Time to find a better scapegoat? Or you could always, you know, own up to the fact that you got beat because of things you can control (dots and gameplanning). Tho technically the decision to have a huge roster turnaround and trash your chemistry is something you controlled as well, but I digress.
Needless to say, then you say GG then blame chem, you are not only incorrectly taking the blame away from people controlling things on your squad, but you are also implying that the other team would have lost if you had better chem, which is both insulting and inaccurate.
tldr: stop blaming chemistry noob
SG✬21
offline
offline
Originally posted by WiSeIVIaN
The fact that your "best team ever" is 9-5 and you are using chemistry as an excuse is lolz. Your total chem gets averaged with your O/D chem to give true chem on that side of the ball. As of today your effective offensive chemistry is 96.5 and your defensive chemistry is 99. So 00.1% on defense attributes and 00.35% on offensive attributes. Blaming chemistry rather than coordinating for losses like this is retarded. Did it have a nonzero effect on your game? Of course. But the effect of dots, the effect of coordinators, is 1000x the impact with no exaggeration.
I mean you guys are losing to 9-5 pro teams in scrims, which don't take into account chemistry. Time to find a better scapegoat? Or you could always, you know, own up to the fact that you got beat because of things you can control (dots and gameplanning). Tho technically the decision to have a huge roster turnaround and trash your chemistry is something you controlled as well, but I digress.
Needless to say, then you say GG then blame chem, you are not only incorrectly taking the blame away from people controlling things on your squad, but you are also implying that the other team would have lost if you had better chem, which is both insulting and inaccurate.
tldr: stop blaming chemistry noob
The fact that your "best team ever" is 9-5 and you are using chemistry as an excuse is lolz. Your total chem gets averaged with your O/D chem to give true chem on that side of the ball. As of today your effective offensive chemistry is 96.5 and your defensive chemistry is 99. So 00.1% on defense attributes and 00.35% on offensive attributes. Blaming chemistry rather than coordinating for losses like this is retarded. Did it have a nonzero effect on your game? Of course. But the effect of dots, the effect of coordinators, is 1000x the impact with no exaggeration.
I mean you guys are losing to 9-5 pro teams in scrims, which don't take into account chemistry. Time to find a better scapegoat? Or you could always, you know, own up to the fact that you got beat because of things you can control (dots and gameplanning). Tho technically the decision to have a huge roster turnaround and trash your chemistry is something you controlled as well, but I digress.
Needless to say, then you say GG then blame chem, you are not only incorrectly taking the blame away from people controlling things on your squad, but you are also implying that the other team would have lost if you had better chem, which is both insulting and inaccurate.
tldr: stop blaming chemistry noob
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
