Warrior General Games

This is awesome. I was telling bug03 earlier today about you going from a face palm post to an insult post on each page. I have you on pretty much your 4th straight page (page 12 is debatable) right now. And this time is was the most straight-forward yet.

Any time it gets to a point in the discussion where you've been beaten, you just have to respond with that combination of posts.

Like a cat fight gone wild or something, though, a cat fight is much more entertaining.

How can 3 different dc's win glb in the same season? I must be out of touch with the charlie sheens of glb.

Originally posted by bhall43
How can 3 different dc's win glb in the same season? I must be out of touch with the charlie sheens of glb. o_O

glb tourney, addicts tourney, wl gold?

its more of an accomplishment to win peewee gold or casual gold than either of those tourneys. Does the addicts even do a tournament anymore?

Originally posted by bhall43
its more of an accomplishment to win peewee gold or casual gold than either of those tourneys. Does the addicts even do a tournament anymore?

dunno, i don't pay attention to them

I want to make sure this thread doesn't drop too far.

Here's a nice little update.

YMXI currently gas 32 % target to reception allowed ratio, is making a play (INT, PD, or KL) on 74% of targets, has 3 INTs, and 3 missed tackles as a CB1 on a 5-1 WL alpha team.

Social Assassin's CBs:
1. 44 % ratio, making a play on 66% of targets, 0 INTs, and 1 missed tackle as a CB2 on a 2-4 WL alpha team.
2. 54% ratio, making a play on 36% of targets, 0 INTs, and 1 missed tackle as a CB2 on a 2-4 WL alpha team.

Bolick's CBs:
1. 48% ratio, play on 38% of targets, 0 INTs, and 3 missed tackles as a CB1 on a 4-2 WL zeta team.
2. 65% ratio, play on 40% of targets, 0 INTs, and 2 missed tackles as a CB3 on a 4-2 WL zeta team.

Obviously play thus far in the season shows that SA and Bolick build CBs that do well in pro, but just aren't elite WL corners. In contrast, YMXI is on of the most elite corners in WL this season, only allowing 32% of targets to be completed, making plays on 3/4 passes thrown his way, and tied in first for INTs in WL zeta.

Most of his stats came in games against bad teams, but kudos for trying to crow about that. It doesn't make you look comically obsessed at all, I promise.

Originally posted by Longhornfan1024
I want to make sure this thread doesn't drop too far.

Here's a nice little update.

YMXI currently gas 32 % target to reception allowed ratio, is making a play (INT, PD, or KL) on 74% of targets, has 3 INTs, and 3 missed tackles as a CB1 on a 5-1 WL zeta team.



Donīt want to confuse you with facts, but YM XI has:

a 51.6% reception allowed ratio 16 rec. allowed/31 targets
made only 9 tackles so with 3 missed tackles he missed 25% of his tackle attempts (thats horrible)
and if he didnīt get traded to Nairobi overnight he is playing in WL Alpha

Originally posted by jdbolick
Most of his stats came in games against bad teams, but kudos for trying to crow about that. It doesn't make you look comically obsessed at all, I promise.

Now stats in WL don't matter either. What a joke you are.

Originally posted by Longhornfan1024
Now stats in WL don't matter either. What a joke you are.

Lol JD thinks WL is the place to play to establish yourself, than someone does and now he downplays it

Full season stats matter, of course, but most of that crappy CB's production came in two games against teams that will finish near the bottom of Zeta.


Originally posted by Robbnva
Lol JD thinks WL is the place to play to establish yourself, than someone does and now he downplays it
Stalking me isn't going to help your reputation at all. Best to just change the name of your account instead of trying to make people believe you're the same guy who used to run it.

Originally posted by Longhornfan1024
I want to make sure this thread doesn't drop too far.

Here's a nice little update.

YMXI currently gas 32 % target to reception allowed ratio, is making a play (INT, PD, or KL) on 74% of targets, has 3 INTs, and 3 missed tackles as a CB1 on a 5-1 WL zeta team.

Social Assassin's CBs:
1. 44 % ratio, making a play on 66% of targets, 0 INTs, and 1 missed tackle as a CB2 on a 2-4 WL alpha team.
2. 54% ratio, making a play on 36% of targets, 0 INTs, and 1 missed tackle as a CB2 on a 2-4 WL alpha team.

Bolick's CBs:
1. 48% ratio, play on 38% of targets, 0 INTs, and 3 missed tackles as a CB1 on a 4-2 WL zeta team.
2. 65% ratio, play on 40% of targets, 0 INTs, and 2 missed tackles as a CB3 on a 4-2 WL zeta team.

Obviously play thus far in the season shows that SA and Bolick build CBs that do well in pro, but just aren't elite WL corners. In contrast, YMXI is on of the most elite corners in WL this season, only allowing 32% of targets to be completed, making plays on 3/4 passes thrown his way, and tied in first for INTs in WL zeta.

Guess we'll leave out the part where I play CB2 and your guy stays in double/triple coverage on CB1. But either way Yes Man XI: Eradication is having a great season. He looks to be the best CB on HOOD at CB1. While my two guys actually look to be the best stat wise on Monks and their playing CB2. *shrugs*

Your other 2 CBs on HOOD are just getting raped though and are slotted in the CB3 spot. Almost looks like HOOD is afraid to let them on the field.

Originally posted by Disastermaster
Donīt want to confuse you with facts, but YM XI has:

a 51.6% reception allowed ratio 16 rec. allowed/31 targets
made only 9 tackles so with 3 missed tackles he missed 25% of his tackle attempts (thats horrible)
and if he didnīt get traded to Nairobi overnight he is playing in WL Alpha






Tackling finally seems to be a problem with the fixes.

Yes Man IX: Extinction 8 tackles 4 missed
Yes Man XI: Eradication 9 tackles 3 missed
Yes Man XII: Ruination 6 tackles none missed

while ....

On Golden Blonde 14 tackles 1 missed
Cheeks & Thongs: Up In Stroke 11 tackles 1 missed

Edit: Thought Bolick meant Longhornfan.

/ignore this.

I'm not stalking you bro

And it's funny I keep pwning you and you resort to making up lies about me.