Originally posted by tautology
Yep. The scoreboard is actually a strong argument, though Gmat does make good points.
Not really. For one it was 5 TDs not 6. 2 for rQB, 2 INts, and 1 KO return. And only reason I used the Qb runs was cause they worked vs them. Had I known they didnt I would have used something else. And the way both teams offenses worked, we would have scored anyways. And the 4INTs is just shitty OC work with progressions. I for one dont think we are best in WL, best in Zeta, or even top 3. But we are doing well. Id rather just see a simple GG after a win then all the whining. We are 7-0 and think we have only had 2 people say GG this whole time. First time in WL for a nobody team that no one even really knows about is impressive in itself. Whether it was "crappy" scores or not. Sims weird as hell.
Example: Immortals have lost to RoTF and ESL. Paris has beat them....BUT Paris damn near lost to the monks and Immortals beat Monks 75-0. No consistency in this sim.
Yep. The scoreboard is actually a strong argument, though Gmat does make good points.
Not really. For one it was 5 TDs not 6. 2 for rQB, 2 INts, and 1 KO return. And only reason I used the Qb runs was cause they worked vs them. Had I known they didnt I would have used something else. And the way both teams offenses worked, we would have scored anyways. And the 4INTs is just shitty OC work with progressions. I for one dont think we are best in WL, best in Zeta, or even top 3. But we are doing well. Id rather just see a simple GG after a win then all the whining. We are 7-0 and think we have only had 2 people say GG this whole time. First time in WL for a nobody team that no one even really knows about is impressive in itself. Whether it was "crappy" scores or not. Sims weird as hell.
Example: Immortals have lost to RoTF and ESL. Paris has beat them....BUT Paris damn near lost to the monks and Immortals beat Monks 75-0. No consistency in this sim.
