Warrior General Games

Originally posted by suske127
Idea; Lose a game and blame it on all the Atheists not "Believing" hard enough

I do not trouble God with my games.

My AI's are my own problem.

Very noble of you.
Most would just Call Hax or blame Bort.

Originally posted by suske127
Very noble of you.
Most would just Call Hax or blame Bort.

I blame Bort for the vague rules.

Okay not really.

Im not much of a rule reader anyway.

not even worth getting banned again.

One thing that seems to get people talking is when you have a CPU coming up ask the team what they want to do for those games. I rarely do this any longer but I've swapped D and O players, ran streaks the whole game, play everyone out of position, ect... It can definitely spark conversation. lol

Originally posted by Darktanian
Science has proven evolution to be a lie. They proved that the DNA of one species cannot evolve into the DNA of another.

Therefore man could not have been an ape at one time.
Fish cannot evolve into birds.
DeathBlade cannot evolve into a good troller.




Incorrect- you can witness evolution happening all around you, since evolution is all game theory and applied statistics. Large changes take a huge amount of time, but look no further than MRSA to watch it in action.

And DeathBlade has been a fantastic troller but he cares less now than he used to, so he's evolved.

Originally posted by Darktanian
Just like the global warming idiots changed their narrative to climate change when scientifically proven wrong.

Just like the same idiots change the meaning of something when proven wrong...like a semi automatic rifle, is now termed by them as an assault rifle.



Actually, Global Warming is a misnomer and makes it sound like it is not too bad a thing. "Accelerated Climate Change" is a better term, though my wife prefers "Global Weather Uber Fuck".

Originally posted by AlBarsch
Hmmm, just a thought - but if you don't believe and it turns out there is an Almighty, it'll be too late. Couldn't the fact that all religions believe in a supreme being indicate there may be one? He could be called any number of names by any number of religions...


Any god that demands I worship it or deserve eternal punishment is not a supreme being. It is a petty, vindictive creature that must be worshiped or you will pay. Sounds more like Paris Hilton than a guide to higher morality.

OTOH, if there is a supreme being that has half the characteristics ascribed to it, it will not care if I spent all Sunday in church or not. More so, given the vastness of the universe, I'm really not important enough in the grand scheme of things.

Also, San Marcos has an excellent chipotle salsa. No chunks, so yello fear not break his chips.

Originally posted by InRomoWeTrust
Let's keep the religion vs atheism debate in the P&R forum please.

We're just demonstrating how to insitgate chat in a team forum. Religion is one topic, but salsa is also important.

If you have jiddy in your forum, burritos are an open topic.

Originally posted by vladykins
Any god that demands I worship it or deserve eternal punishment is not a supreme being. It is a petty, vindictive creature that must be worshiped or you will pay. Sounds more like Paris Hilton than a guide to higher morality.

OTOH, if there is a supreme being that has half the characteristics ascribed to it, it will not care if I spent all Sunday in church or not. More so, given the vastness of the universe, I'm really not important enough in the grand scheme of things.

Also, San Marcos has an excellent chipotle salsa. No chunks, so yello fear not break his chips.

if you want, I can be "God" and I don't demand worship, and want you to live it up anyway you want, the only condition is that after you die, I demand a payment of 19.99 (plus shipping and handling) for a snuggie that you must be burried or cremated in, other than that do as you wish

Originally posted by Charlie Wooters
Originally posted by vladykins

Any god that demands I worship it or deserve eternal punishment is not a supreme being. It is a petty, vindictive creature that must be worshiped or you will pay. Sounds more like Paris Hilton than a guide to higher morality.

OTOH, if there is a supreme being that has half the characteristics ascribed to it, it will not care if I spent all Sunday in church or not. More so, given the vastness of the universe, I'm really not important enough in the grand scheme of things.

Also, San Marcos has an excellent chipotle salsa. No chunks, so yello fear not break his chips.

if you want, I can be "God" and I don't demand worship, and want you to live it up anyway you want, the only condition is that after you die, I demand a payment of 19.99 (plus shipping and handling) for a snuggie that you must be burried or cremated in, other than that do as you wish

If I'm in a snuggie, then it is cremation.

Moving this thread to religion where it now belongs.

Originally posted by vladykins
If I'm in a snuggie, then it is cremation.

the only one I have left is pink with leopard spots on it

Thread moved by moderator.

Originally posted by vladykins
Any god that demands I worship it or deserve eternal punishment is not a supreme being. It is a petty, vindictive creature that must be worshiped or you will pay. Sounds more like Paris Hilton than a guide to higher morality.

OTOH, if there is a supreme being that has half the characteristics ascribed to it, it will not care if I spent all Sunday in church or not. More so, given the vastness of the universe, I'm really not important enough in the grand scheme of things.

Also, San Marcos has an excellent chipotle salsa. No chunks, so yello fear not break his chips.

So Vlady your basing your disbelief of God based on morality? Just because you do not like how God does things does not change if He is real or not does it?