Originally posted by merenoise
Luckily since you have so many bad ideas it was quick and painless. If someone had the time or inclination I'm sure they could find many, many more examples of exactly how far off base you routinely are. At least yello is sometimes funny. You, just sad.
You really are obsessed. I've had a lot of good ideas that were universally accepted, too.
I don't believe you that it was easy for you, because the search capabilities on GLB are pretty limited, and you had to go back very far, and your "examples" weren't all from the same week or anything. You had to go through months of posts.
I fully stand by opposing full VA resets and stand by my belief coaches would have been a good addition to the game. I also stand by that one sack in a well-matched game is good and two is great. Look at rl football and I'm backed up on that. I do admit that I went overboard in my desire to limit sacks, but that was still better than had sacks not been changed at all and Speed had been king of linemen the way it is elsewhere in the game.
You're so pathetic that all you can do is attack me rather than offer good arguments. It's bizarre that you're so obsessed with me. Others have moved on. You've shown in other posts that you enjoy others' pain, so I guess you want to cause pain through personal attacks more than you want to be constructive.
BACK ON TOPIC: I was undecided on this issue until I read TruthHammer's post, which pointed out that there would be a [f]iuture need for as many leagues as we have. To me, that was enough to justify having more leagues than we need now, as if we need them after the game is pronounced Gold, there's a good chance we wouldn't get them.
Luckily since you have so many bad ideas it was quick and painless. If someone had the time or inclination I'm sure they could find many, many more examples of exactly how far off base you routinely are. At least yello is sometimes funny. You, just sad.
You really are obsessed. I've had a lot of good ideas that were universally accepted, too.
I don't believe you that it was easy for you, because the search capabilities on GLB are pretty limited, and you had to go back very far, and your "examples" weren't all from the same week or anything. You had to go through months of posts.
I fully stand by opposing full VA resets and stand by my belief coaches would have been a good addition to the game. I also stand by that one sack in a well-matched game is good and two is great. Look at rl football and I'm backed up on that. I do admit that I went overboard in my desire to limit sacks, but that was still better than had sacks not been changed at all and Speed had been king of linemen the way it is elsewhere in the game.
You're so pathetic that all you can do is attack me rather than offer good arguments. It's bizarre that you're so obsessed with me. Others have moved on. You've shown in other posts that you enjoy others' pain, so I guess you want to cause pain through personal attacks more than you want to be constructive.
BACK ON TOPIC: I was undecided on this issue until I read TruthHammer's post, which pointed out that there would be a [f]iuture need for as many leagues as we have. To me, that was enough to justify having more leagues than we need now, as if we need them after the game is pronounced Gold, there's a good chance we wouldn't get them.
Edited by Ken1 on Jan 31, 2012 15:31:39






























