Warrior General Games

great idea

+1

Originally posted by Antonine
Too new to have been here when player cash was useful for stuff that directly affects games (like EQ), but it sounds like it would be a nightmare for owners and teams if such a system was restored, in any form.

Originally posted by Crushr
I am not a fan of player cash being used for anything, but especially not upgrades etc. I remember the old system where it was simply a rich gets richer scenario. The teams that had cash got the best players. It made recruiting a nightmare even if you had cash to spend. Players became Prima Donna's and it severely reduced the enjoyment of owning a team and playing the game. I'd hate to see us return to those days.

Originally posted by beenlurken
Who put this suggestion up for voting should be shot...

Originally posted by Denthor
Money = Morale.

Unless you're Michael Irvin, and you get caught with an ounce of coke & a 16yo girl in your car, what you do with it is your buisiness.

Players pay for EQ with BTs: I too have been around forever, and I remember seeing on many team forums, posts requesting EQ funds; from poorly managed teams.

Let the agents control their own player's future here...

-1 on the thread. Thumb-down on the vote...

Originally posted by joemalaka
Originally posted by ImTheScientist

No, this idea is dog shit. (to be polite) Player cash means exploitation time. There are all ready enough things to worry about.


Shocked that this made it to suggestions

I was totally against this at first.

Originally posted by livebytheblitz
Shocked that this made it to suggestions


Shocked that you think 7 people (including you) should stop it from going to a vote, when we are on page 12.

Glancing at all of the pages there seems to be more in favor some way than not in favor at all.

Originally posted by Dub J
I was totally against this at first.

And now I am still against it.

Those were quotes just from the last page. I don't care enough to actually go through the entire thread.

Originally posted by livebytheblitz
Those were quotes just from the last page. I don't care enough to actually go through the entire thread.

OIC

Originally posted by livebytheblitz
Those were quotes just from the last page. I don't care enough to actually go through the entire thread.

maybe you should at minimum read the quotes in the OP since there is more than 7 there

Originally posted by Team Nucleus
maybe you should at minimum read the quotes in the OP since there is more than 7 there

Yeah I glanced at them I thought most of them were just people making jokes. 25% chance of STD? Seriously?

This makes me want to punch babbies.

-1

Originally posted by Dub J
This makes me want to punch babbies.

I just hit a kitteh...

Problem with the OP for me is, it's too wide-ranging and open for a lot of people to give it a +1. There's a big difference between making player's cash useful for cosmetic stuff, or maybe even for morale stuff, and making it useful for things that will have a much bigger direct impact on the field like EQ. Anything that gives any kind of significant advantage on-field is clearly going to lead to problems. I'm all for the cosmetic stuff, the "fun" stuff: I don't think this game should be limited to a joyless, number-crunching, VPB-dominated experience for dot agents. But I can't see how this has gone to a vote when the OP is so broad and undefined. We don't know exactly what we are voting for.