Warrior General Games

it's a faulty comparison, because what Hazy did was give himself a cheap advantage by bringing a couple extra dozen players to the game to give him a cheap edge by playing an unsporting game. I didn't use money in this game to give our team extra touchdowns or to deplete his team's energy and morale. You are making a silly comparison.

lol, this thread hasn't died yet.

Signed,

thehazycheapadvantagecheapedgewhoplaysanunsportinggameone

(you do realize college rosters have 70+ players and special teams only players don't you - this game is much more like college with recruiting and short term (3 years max) than it is the NFL with a draft and long term contracts)

Don't forget to add how you like to call other people idiots and that their team sucks just because you can beat them with your exploitation skills.

Originally posted by The Strategy Expert
it's a faulty comparison, because what Hazy did was give himself a cheap advantage by bringing a couple extra dozen players to the game to give him a cheap edge by playing an unsporting game. I didn't use money in this game to give our team extra touchdowns or to deplete his team's energy and morale. You are making a silly comparison.

No...I'm really not. It's all a matter of opinion saying one thing is a cheap advantage while another is not. Having a bunch of money and the ability to re-spec equipment whenever you want, not to mention being set for lvl 56 equipment is not just as much of an advantage as extra depth? Not to mention it's not like extra depth is an automatic win...saying it just gave his team extra touchdowns is ridiculous.

The only one I see making arguments devoid of logic here is you. One way to gain an advantage is totally legitimate, but the other is a chicken shit way to win. It's really making you look like a poor-sport, and saying anyone who argues with you doesn't know what they're talking about or isn't using logic does not make your correct. I'm pretty sure everyone here sees through your posts, because you really don't even have a legitimate argument or point for that matter.

oh ok my bad.

Signed,

thehazycheapadvantagecheapedgewhoplaysanunsportinggametsereallyisanidiotimnottakingitbackthistimeandhisteamsucksballsone

Originally posted by The Strategy Expert
You are making a silly comparison.

You still aren't explaining why it is a cheap edge. If I wanted to spend $50,000 and have a roster of 200 players and give everyone 5 snaps a game, that would be my choice.

You are basing your argument on your own personal preference in how you choose to play the game, and dismissing any other viewpoint as illogical (without providing any logic as to why it is wrong to have more depth, again "because it gives you an advantage" is not logic to back up this argument).

You tried to gain an advantage by getting extra money. Then you lobbied for more features to be added to the game so that teams and players could make use of their $.

Whether or not your extra money has given you an advantage to date is irrelevent to the discussion.

Ok Duff, I'll let you have that as the last word then, and people can feel free to make their own judgments, if they want to sign on and support the comments that you and Hazy have made, then so be it, I've said all I need to say on the issue, and this is turning into ridiculous post after ridiculous post with no apparent and constructive end in sight.

Originally posted by thehazyone

Signed,

thehazycheapadvantagecheapedgewhoplaysanunsportinggametsereallyisanidiotimnottakingitbackthistimeandhisteamsucksballsone

Here's a new strategy secret for the classic game of Pong that you might really appreciate.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xvY1hItGBCY

Originally posted by The Strategy Expert

I have completely lost all respect for Duff with his comments in this thread, he's way off base, he's wrong, and he has embarrassed himself greatly in this thread. You don't call somebody out unless you have real goods and a logical rationale to back up your claims.

THOSE ARE CONCRETE FACTS, AND NOT (MORE OF) TSE'S (MORONIC) OPINIONS.

Originally posted by Kevin Smith
Originally posted by The Strategy Expert


I have completely lost all respect for Duff with his comments in this thread, he's way off base, he's wrong, and he has embarrassed himself greatly in this thread.


If you´re doing this on purpose you´re a comic genius. I am in stitches here reading some of the stuff you write.


I've tried to explain to this guy multiple times how everyone laughs at him, he doesn't understand it.

Originally posted by The Strategy Expert
it's a faulty comparison, because what Hazy did was give himself a cheap advantage by bringing a couple extra dozen players to the game to give him a cheap edge by playing an unsporting game. I didn't use money in this game to give our team extra touchdowns or to deplete his team's energy and morale. You are making a silly comparison.

Your stupidity knows no boundaries.

Originally posted by Sik Wit It

The only one I see making arguments devoid of logic here is TSE. One way to gain an advantage is totally legitimate, but the other is a chicken shit way to win. It's really making TSE look like a poor-sport, and saying anyone who argues with TSE doesn't know what they're talking about or isn't using logic does not make TSE correct. I'm pretty sure everyone here sees through TSE posts, because you really don't even have a legitimate argument or point for that matter.

I nominate this as the only response allowed to TSE posts in the future.

DRAGO C-C-C-Combo breaker

Originally posted by The Duff Man
Originally posted by The Strategy Expert

You are making a silly comparison.

You still aren't explaining why it is a cheap edge. If I wanted to spend $50,000 and have a roster of 200 players and give everyone 5 snaps a game, that would be my choice.

You are basing your argument on your own personal preference in how you choose to play the game, and dismissing any other viewpoint as illogical (without providing any logic as to why it is wrong to have more depth, again "because it gives you an advantage" is not logic to back up this argument).

You tried to gain an advantage by getting extra money. Then you lobbied for more features to be added to the game so that teams and players could make use of their $.

Whether or not your extra money has given you an advantage to date is irrelevent to the discussion.






The more I read TSE posts the more I am inclined to believe he is a house bound agrophobe and this is his only contact with the outside world.

Either that or he is just a mega DB.


You make the call

There's no doubt that I love staying home. I had a job a while back that was extensive travel, and I was gone 90% of the year traveling the country for a few years, and I'm sick of going places to be honest lol.

It's also strategy, for one, 95% of my day to day work activities take place from home. Dating experiences are 95% here as well. I don't go out with a lady, as I am a finicky dater and I'm looking for a certain type of woman, and I do my evaluations here. One day when I find the right woman if she wants to leave the house and go out, that's fine, but until I find somebody I'm happy with, I hold auditions here. I am very comfortable in my lifestyle of being home all day every day, it's what I've always wanted.