Warrior General Games

Originally posted by JcWildcat
It's okay lol, I figured someone would hate me for thinking of that argument.

i thought of it, i told myself i was nuts and it wasnt true so i could love the idea you jsut made me hate this idea even tho it would help out my team.

Originally posted by JcWildcat
I did not read through the 11 pages to see if this argument has been brought up or not, BUT:

Scenerio:

FA gets a pm from an owner, FA signs with the team. Owner then demands that FA donates flex for friendlies. FA declines. Owner benches that FA.

I would not do this but there are owners that would. If there weren't owners like this, we would not have so many owner bashing threads.

Another thing is owners might start just signing FAs that say they will donate. Then bench them when they don't.

Those are just the two ways this could be abused IMO off the top of my head.

Good points. There would have to be official rules made about no bribery/blackmail/whatever. Just another annoying thing to watch over.

In a perfect world the suggestion is good, but in GLB I don't know if it would be worth the hassle.

Yeah, unfortunately I don't think it's worth the hassle for the admin/mods. I'm not against the idea, just wary of it b/c of the bad owner threads that always come up lol.

I support it with the hope that it wont get abused.

Originally posted by prokop
Originally posted by JcWildcat

Originally posted by prokop


i agree JC and i hate that. bad owners ruin it for us good owners.

That it does. And ryan, sometimes it's a team full of friends?

I hate being the devils advocate here, but I'd hate for there even to be a chance for bad owners to take advantage of this. Imagine what it would do to recruiting lol

this is true. its a good idea but we all know GLB Owners can be really stupid. i know id never force any1 to donate to scrimmages, unless they had a friend they wanted to face. but other than that i dont care who donates and who doesnt as long as we all stay active and set gameplans

but other owners will bench and rot players for sure.


this could be something to PM support about? support can look into it.... owner gets possibly banned/removed from team.

Originally posted by Nixx
Originally posted by JcWildcat

I did not read through the 11 pages to see if this argument has been brought up or not, BUT:

Scenerio:

FA gets a pm from an owner, FA signs with the team. Owner then demands that FA donates flex for friendlies. FA declines. Owner benches that FA.

I would not do this but there are owners that would. If there weren't owners like this, we would not have so many owner bashing threads.

Another thing is owners might start just signing FAs that say they will donate. Then bench them when they don't.

Those are just the two ways this could be abused IMO off the top of my head.

Good points. There would have to be official rules made about no bribery/blackmail/whatever. Just another annoying thing to watch over.

In a perfect world the suggestion is good, but in GLB I don't know if it would be worth the hassle.

yes, it would be nice if all marketplace adds that would say "i will donate FPs" be instantly cleared as soon as it is seen.

Ok I did not read the whole thread but the skeptical nature of this idea is this.

What precaution would be put in place to stop somebody opening a new account for free. Sign with a team and donate the left over Flex to the bank.

The premise is that it can only be used for Scrimmage Games or Practice's if that is added, so you can't use it for players or extending owner ship.

Originally posted by Luckeroll
Ok I did not read the whole thread but the skeptical nature of this idea is this.

What precaution would be put in place to stop somebody opening a new account for free. Sign with a team and donate the left over Flex to the bank.

i know this may be a problem, but uh, let me find the post real quick, its somewhere here.

i like this idea cuz as of now i have 10 fps and nothing to do with them

im PMing support, your avatar is giving me a siezure

+1

The one thing i'd say, is I don't know that we should be able to do this with a LARGE amount of points, I think it should be limited, but the concept of this idea is based on a 'limited' # of FP anyway, and I agree 100% what's the point of having 5 FP. It's kinda silly when you really think about it.

omg can this happen this is such a good idea! +1111111111111111111111111111110000000000000000000000000000