Warrior General Games

Originally posted by jbienven
Originally posted by UnderDogs

Originally posted by LSU




The fact that you would even question Cali not being in the top 4, obviously shows how stupid you are.
Those are the top 4, I think it's safe to say Syndicate is #4, and the other three you can rotate... But the fact that 8 Mile and California have better records... They belong ahead.

you are stupid and full of yourselves over there.

CANTON beat 8-MILE.

CALI lost to 8-mile.

Canton =better than Cali.
Canton= better than 8-mile obviously because we beat them

GET over yourselves.

SO UP TO DATE
1) CANTON
2)8-mile
3) Cali
4) syndicate.

if anything that's because I don't want to hear you whine, even though I know syndicate is a better team than CALI.

waaaaahhhh waaaaaaahhh....you think your fake football team is better than my fake football team....

How old are you? 11?

don't be hating. you're on the wrong side of 3-0 bro.

Originally posted by UnderDogs
Originally posted by jbienven

Originally posted by UnderDogs


Originally posted by LSU





The fact that you would even question Cali not being in the top 4, obviously shows how stupid you are.
Those are the top 4, I think it's safe to say Syndicate is #4, and the other three you can rotate... But the fact that 8 Mile and California have better records... They belong ahead.

you are stupid and full of yourselves over there.

CANTON beat 8-MILE.

CALI lost to 8-mile.

Canton =better than Cali.
Canton= better than 8-mile obviously because we beat them

GET over yourselves.

SO UP TO DATE
1) CANTON
2)8-mile
3) Cali
4) syndicate.

if anything that's because I don't want to hear you whine, even though I know syndicate is a better team than CALI.

waaaaahhhh waaaaaaahhh....you think your fake football team is better than my fake football team....

How old are you? 11?

don't be hating. you're on the wrong side of 3-0 bro.


Can't be hypocritical. If you say head to head against 8 Mile makes you "obviously" better, than you have to look at the other side of that... Nightmare is "obviously" better than you, and Cali is "obviously" better than you.

Plus, you beat 8 Mile by what, a field goal? Great job. No sarcasm in that... But to say that is "obviously"... Then you're a fool.

I do, however, think that if you want to say that's obvious... Then what the hell do you call a 16 point loss to Cali?

Cali = Beat Canton
Canton = Lost to Cali

Wait. So if Canton is obviously better than 8 Mile... Because you beat them...

Then Cali is obviously better than Canton... Because we beat you.

How you gonna explain that one?

Originally posted by UnderDogs
Originally posted by LSU



The fact that you would even question Cali not being in the top 4, obviously shows how stupid you are.
Those are the top 4, I think it's safe to say Syndicate is #4, and the other three you can rotate... But the fact that 8 Mile and California have better records... They belong ahead.

you are stupid and full of yourselves over there.

CANTON beat 8-MILE.

CALI lost to 8-mile.

Canton =better than Cali.
Canton= better than 8-mile obviously because we beat them

GET over yourselves.

SO UP TO DATE
1) CANTON
2)8-mile
3) Cali
4) syndicate.

if anything that's because I don't want to hear you whine, even though I know syndicate is a better team than CALI.

By that logic it is:

8 Mile = better than Cali, Nightmare
Cali = better than Canton, Nightmare
Canton = better than 8 mile
Nightmare= better than Canton

8 Mile and Cali have more quality wins than the other two when comparing the 4 teams so:

1. 8 Mile
2. Cali
3. Canton
4. Nightmare

Simple and to the point, so easy an underdog can do it.

Just to make you happy though here are my rankings:
1. 8 Mile
2. Canton
3. Nightmare
4. Blackbears
5. Trojans
6. Hitmen
7. Orange Maners
8. Cali (we suck and are lucky to get in the playoffs, no pressure because we are supposed to lose in the 1st round)

yeah which is why I put nightmare ahead of CALI but nightmare didn't beat 8-mile.
1 canton
2 8-mile
3 Syndicate
4 CALI

deal with it. that's up to date. this is how it is today. We aren't looking at games that happen week3 . this is what it is RIGHT NOW. you beat the best? you become the best. Just get over it.

Originally posted by UnderDogs
yeah which is why I put nightmare ahead of CALI but nightmare didn't beat 8-mile.
1 canton
2 8-mile
3 Syndicate
4 CALI

deal with it. that's up to date. this is how it is today. We aren't looking at games that happen week3 . this is what it is RIGHT NOW. you beat the best? you become the best. Just get over it.


Yeah but Nightmare beat Canton and so did Cali. So between the top 4 teams:

8 Mile - 2 wins 1 loss
Cali - 2 wins 1 loss
Canton - 1 win 2 losses
Nightmare - 1 win 2 losses

See my point, heck even Nightmare has more of a claim to #3 since they beat Canton head to head. Also Canton almost lost to the Trojans where 8-Mile and Cali beat them handedly. Your logic is weak.

This is the same argument that happens every year in college football and the reason there needs to be a playoff.

But this is slightly different.

We'll use this:

#1 = 11-0
#2 = 10-1
#3 = 10-1
#4 = 9-2


Let's say...
#4 beats #1.

They won't jump #2 and #3 just because of the fact that they beat #1... BECAUSE they would still have one more loss than does current #2 and #3.
It's called simple reasoning UD. And you're obviously just too stupid to have any logic.

Originally posted by LSU
But this is slightly different.

We'll use this:

#1 = 11-0
#2 = 10-1
#3 = 10-1
#4 = 9-2


Let's say...
#4 beats #1.

They won't jump #2 and #3 just because of the fact that they beat #1... BECAUSE they would still have one more loss than does current #2 and #3.
It's called simple reasoning UD. And you're obviously just too stupid to have any logic.

watch real football power rankings. Sometimes a team with 3 losses will be number 1 over a team with 1 loss. It happens all the time. We beat the best team in the league where you failed. We are a different team now. Obviously better and obviously number 1. I don't care about the past. today, this day, we are #1 in the power rankings. next week maybe not.

you beat the best you become the best. I don't understand what's so hard about that. or how you can argue the truth in that statement.

Power Rankings are an awesome thing for creating discussion, but it can be a little more constructive than this. Luckily there are playoffs after this. All those teams in question did really well and all deserve congratulations, so ignoring all of the above posts I'd just like to say Congratulations! From the Nightmre Syndicate team to all of you, and good luck to those that are on the verge, it is getting exciting.

Originally posted by riccor25
This is the same argument that happens every year in college football and the reason there needs to be a playoff.


I'm just glad this get's to be settled on the field rather than by some computer.....

wait...

this is settled by a computer


SHIT!!!!!!

Originally posted by Coach823
Originally posted by riccor25

This is the same argument that happens every year in college football and the reason there needs to be a playoff.


I'm just glad this get's to be settled on the field rather than by some computer.....

wait...

this is settled by a computer


SHIT!!!!!!

HAHAHAHA random damn simulations. that's all we are talking about here.

Originally posted by UnderDogs
Originally posted by LSU

But this is slightly different.

We'll use this:

#1 = 11-0
#2 = 10-1
#3 = 10-1
#4 = 9-2


Let's say...
#4 beats #1.

They won't jump #2 and #3 just because of the fact that they beat #1... BECAUSE they would still have one more loss than does current #2 and #3.
It's called simple reasoning UD. And you're obviously just too stupid to have any logic.

watch real football power rankings. Sometimes a team with 3 losses will be number 1 over a team with 1 loss. It happens all the time. We beat the best team in the league where you failed. We are a different team now. Obviously better and obviously number 1. I don't care about the past. today, this day, we are #1 in the power rankings. next week maybe not.

A. No, not for something that extreme. Unless that 1 loss team has played shit. Other than that, you'll never see a 3 loss team jump a 1 loss team. If youd o, and you say it "happens all the time" show me one time it has EVER happened in college football... WHERE the team that was jumped was in a power 6 conference (Don't give me the bullshit of midmajors).

B. I think you might have the saying wrong "To be the best, you have to play the best". Not "If you beat the best, you are the best."

C. You can't change the fact that you still have one more loss than California and 8 Mile. You don't care about the past? Well the past is what makes you have two losses, so of course you won't... Your bias, and would skew stats so that you could say you are the best. If I had to honestly make a power ranking:

1. 8 Mile
2. California
3. Canton
4. Nightmare.
5-8. Who cares

EDIT: Put the two backwards.

you can't put Canton at 2, then we have nothing to debate.

Originally posted by LSU


A. No, not for something that extreme. Unless that 1 loss team has played shit. Other than that, you'll never see a 3 loss team jump a 1 loss team. If youd o, and you say it "happens all the time" show me one time it has EVER happened in college football... WHERE the team that was jumped was in a power 6 conference (Don't give me the bullshit of midmajors).

B. I think you might have the saying wrong "To be the best, you have to play the best". Not "If you beat the best, you are the best."

C. You can't change the fact that you still have one more loss than California and 8 Mile. You don't care about the past? Well the past is what makes you have two losses, so of course you won't... Your bias, and would skew stats so that you could say you are the best. If I had to honestly make a power ranking:

A. i am not talking about college football. It's a joke. UTAH the 13-0 team was 2nd in one poll and 5th in another? Or something like that? Both polls had U.S.C. over The Longhorns. U.S.C lost to the fucking ducks. The long horns lost to the red raiders. It's a joke. But in the NFL you see it all the time. A team could be 7-0 and lose to a 5-2 team and that 6-2 team will be ahead of the 7-1 team next week. that's kinda the case here. maybe saying 3 losses was a bit much. but I do see this exact scenario in the N.F.L. panning out where the team goes the number 1.

B no Im pretty sure when I say stuff, it's exactly how I want to say it.

C No I don't care about the past because in the past 8-mile has beaten everyone, and we beat 8-mile. Today we are number 1.