Warrior General Games

<--- real interest

Over 1000 for votes is nothing to sneeze at.

I dont think they need to cater to 20 player teams.

Originally posted by notthegint
Over 1000 for votes is nothing to sneeze at.

yes, but it's also the 3rd worst received of all suggestions on the list...

This is something I could definitely get into. And my reasoning behind would be:

1. I'd be much more inclined to buy and make an entire team as it'd be easier on the pocket then making an entire team of regular players.
2. Breaks up the routine of making dots certain ways (as the game is set up now).
3. Different offense and defensive strategies would need to be used to find success.

Originally posted by Serenity
yes, but it's also the 3rd worst received of all suggestions on the list...
Maybe, but 1090 votes with 2 players each = 2180 players / 20 = >100 teams = Profits
(1090 votes for, 812 against)

+ a billion

Interesting idea...

Before I voted either way on it, though, I'd like to see how well it worked.

Originally posted by John Waylon
Interesting idea...

Before I voted either way on it, though, I'd like to see how well it worked.

That would be kinda hard, if you wait until they impliment it, your vote wont matter.

This will take a very different view on building players and play calling. I'm still waiting for this idea to get started, I will definately own a team in this league.

-100

Originally posted by Skoll Wolfrun

Maybe, but 1090 votes with 2 players each = 2180 players / 20 = >100 teams = Profits
(1090 votes for, 812 against)

A bit presumptuous to think every for vote is going to create players ... It is like thinking every 'for' vote for Team flex bank ran out and gave their owner some flex as soon as it was implemented.

really wanna hear everyones reason against this is? this wud add another fun diminision to the game. and see no reason not to impliment it

Originally posted by kb2120
A bit presumptuous to think every for vote is going to create players ... It is like thinking every 'for' vote for Team flex bank ran out and gave their owner some flex as soon as it was implemented.

This is not a good analogy.

Originally posted by notthegint
This is not a good analogy.

its not a horrible one.....

Originally posted by We_Rule
its not a horrible one.....

Multi?

And it is horrible. It really, really is.