bolick and wise need to hug it out
Forum > Goal Line Blitz > Interception numbers skyrocket
Originally posted by WiSeIVIaN
If you think what I PM'd you before blocking ur PM's was an insult, you have serious mental problems imo.
Was the phrase "you're a poopy face" involved?
If you think what I PM'd you before blocking ur PM's was an insult, you have serious mental problems imo.
Was the phrase "you're a poopy face" involved?
jdbolick
offline
offline
Originally posted by coachingubigr
bolick and wise need to hug it out
WiSe needs to not pick fights with people who were out his intellectual league when they were ten.
Originally posted by WiSeIVIaN
If you think what I PM'd you before blocking ur PM's was an insult, you have serious mental problems imo.
Granted, calling me a "moron" wasn't the most clever insult but it was still insulting. You're like a worse version of ITS.
bolick and wise need to hug it out
WiSe needs to not pick fights with people who were out his intellectual league when they were ten.
Originally posted by WiSeIVIaN
If you think what I PM'd you before blocking ur PM's was an insult, you have serious mental problems imo.
Granted, calling me a "moron" wasn't the most clever insult but it was still insulting. You're like a worse version of ITS.
dmfa41
offline
offline
Originally posted by jdbolick
Our returner (with +16% avoid fumble EQ) fumbled on back to back returns today, and his morale at the start of the second was still 91. Whatever the mechanic is that makes turnovers increase the chance of more turnovers appears to be independent of morale.
I don't pretend to know about the intricacies of game mechanics like that...but can you be completely certain that those two fumbles next to one another isn't either random chance or attributable to the defense's builds and tactics? Or that given the returner's build, maybe 91 morale was low enough to tip it so slightly over the edge? I know there's a lot to suggest that turnovers beget turnovers, but can you be sure this is an index case?
Our returner (with +16% avoid fumble EQ) fumbled on back to back returns today, and his morale at the start of the second was still 91. Whatever the mechanic is that makes turnovers increase the chance of more turnovers appears to be independent of morale.
I don't pretend to know about the intricacies of game mechanics like that...but can you be completely certain that those two fumbles next to one another isn't either random chance or attributable to the defense's builds and tactics? Or that given the returner's build, maybe 91 morale was low enough to tip it so slightly over the edge? I know there's a lot to suggest that turnovers beget turnovers, but can you be sure this is an index case?
dmfa41
offline
offline
Definitely clicked the "lock thread with this post" button by accident...JD probably just ruptured an aneurysm 
Originally posted by dmfa41
Definitely clicked the "lock thread with this post" button by accident...JD probably just ruptured an aneurysm
Reported for locking
Definitely clicked the "lock thread with this post" button by accident...JD probably just ruptured an aneurysm
Reported for locking
jdbolick
offline
offline
Originally posted by dmfa41
I don't pretend to know about the intricacies of game mechanics like that...but can you be completely certain that those two fumbles next to one another isn't either random chance or attributable to the defense's builds and tactics? Or that given the returner's build, maybe 91 morale was low enough to tip it so slightly over the edge? I know there's a lot to suggest that turnovers beget turnovers, but can you be sure this is an index case?
This one example doesn't mean much other than adding evidence that morale isn't the explanation. But I've been harping on this for over four years and there are a ton of examples collectively.
I don't pretend to know about the intricacies of game mechanics like that...but can you be completely certain that those two fumbles next to one another isn't either random chance or attributable to the defense's builds and tactics? Or that given the returner's build, maybe 91 morale was low enough to tip it so slightly over the edge? I know there's a lot to suggest that turnovers beget turnovers, but can you be sure this is an index case?
This one example doesn't mean much other than adding evidence that morale isn't the explanation. But I've been harping on this for over four years and there are a ton of examples collectively.
Darkstrand
offline
offline
Originally posted by jdbolick
http://goallineblitz.com/game/forum_thread.pl?thread_id=2592578
hmm in the nfl are HBs more or less likely to fumble 2x
http://goallineblitz.com/game/forum_thread.pl?thread_id=2592578
hmm in the nfl are HBs more or less likely to fumble 2x
Originally posted by Darkstrand
hmm in the nfl are HBs more or less likely to fumble 2x
If they play for Dallas, the answer is more
hmm in the nfl are HBs more or less likely to fumble 2x
If they play for Dallas, the answer is more
Edited by coachingubigr on Jul 29, 2013 20:49:28
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
