Clearly Halgalaz should be in the WL instead of any of our DS teams...not sure how we keep ending up with 5-6 of them each season given the fact that we build exactly the way he's saying not to...hmm, maybe this will be our last season in the WL...and D9 gets destroyed by Rhombus in CPL. I guess only time will tell.
Hagalaz
offline
offline
Originally posted by mwoods07
Clearly Halgalaz should be in the WL instead of any of our DS teams...not sure how we keep ending up with 5-6 of them each season given the fact that we build exactly the way he's saying not to...hmm, maybe this will be our last season in the WL...and D9 gets destroyed by Rhombus in CPL. I guess only time will tell.
I don't see why you have such a fixation with the rhombus. Is this some sort of freudian thing? Did you get raped by a quadrilateral when you were young or something ? -_-
Now, I'm well aware plenty of the people up top don't know how to build and just imitate one another like apes. That's mainly the reason I stick with people who I see are willing to learn and improve, because these people, given time, will end up building flawlessly while others will still build the way they do now and refuse to improve.
It's up to you and every single one of the players of GLB to choose what they want.
Now if you have something against me, stop trying to diss the rhombus and start dissing ME.
(Also, a good suggestion that you won't follow is to check whether or not what I said was more efficient than your way of building, but since you're just another of the sheep, you're all sure of yourself and will ignore this fine opportunity to become a better builder... )
Clearly Halgalaz should be in the WL instead of any of our DS teams...not sure how we keep ending up with 5-6 of them each season given the fact that we build exactly the way he's saying not to...hmm, maybe this will be our last season in the WL...and D9 gets destroyed by Rhombus in CPL. I guess only time will tell.
I don't see why you have such a fixation with the rhombus. Is this some sort of freudian thing? Did you get raped by a quadrilateral when you were young or something ? -_-
Now, I'm well aware plenty of the people up top don't know how to build and just imitate one another like apes. That's mainly the reason I stick with people who I see are willing to learn and improve, because these people, given time, will end up building flawlessly while others will still build the way they do now and refuse to improve.
It's up to you and every single one of the players of GLB to choose what they want.
Now if you have something against me, stop trying to diss the rhombus and start dissing ME.
(Also, a good suggestion that you won't follow is to check whether or not what I said was more efficient than your way of building, but since you're just another of the sheep, you're all sure of yourself and will ignore this fine opportunity to become a better builder... )
MadCow420
offline
offline
Originally posted by Hagalaz
Originally posted by mwoods07
Clearly Halgalaz should be in the WL instead of any of our DS teams...not sure how we keep ending up with 5-6 of them each season given the fact that we build exactly the way he's saying not to...hmm, maybe this will be our last season in the WL...and D9 gets destroyed by Rhombus in CPL. I guess only time will tell.
I don't see why you have such a fixation with the rhombus. Is this some sort of freudian thing? Did you get raped by a quadrilateral when you were young or something ? -_-
Now, I'm well aware plenty of the people up top don't know how to build and just imitate one another like apes. That's mainly the reason I stick with people who I see are willing to learn and improve, because these people, given time, will end up building flawlessly while others will still build the way they do now and refuse to improve.
It's up to you and every single one of the players of GLB to choose what they want.
Now if you have something against me, stop trying to diss the rhombus and start dissing ME.
(Also, a good suggestion that you won't follow is to check whether or not what I said was more efficient than your way of building, but since you're just another of the sheep, you're all sure of yourself and will ignore this fine opportunity to become a better builder... )
you suck
Originally posted by mwoods07
Clearly Halgalaz should be in the WL instead of any of our DS teams...not sure how we keep ending up with 5-6 of them each season given the fact that we build exactly the way he's saying not to...hmm, maybe this will be our last season in the WL...and D9 gets destroyed by Rhombus in CPL. I guess only time will tell.
I don't see why you have such a fixation with the rhombus. Is this some sort of freudian thing? Did you get raped by a quadrilateral when you were young or something ? -_-
Now, I'm well aware plenty of the people up top don't know how to build and just imitate one another like apes. That's mainly the reason I stick with people who I see are willing to learn and improve, because these people, given time, will end up building flawlessly while others will still build the way they do now and refuse to improve.
It's up to you and every single one of the players of GLB to choose what they want.
Now if you have something against me, stop trying to diss the rhombus and start dissing ME.
(Also, a good suggestion that you won't follow is to check whether or not what I said was more efficient than your way of building, but since you're just another of the sheep, you're all sure of yourself and will ignore this fine opportunity to become a better builder... )
you suck
daddylox
offline
offline
Even though we are not competing well thus far, I am proud of the fact we made it this far up (so far).
MadCow420
offline
offline
Originally posted by daddylox
Even though we are not competing well thus far, I am proud of the fact we made it this far up (so far).
sorry to break it to you, But every season teams promote, you can go 0-16 and still promote until Regional Pro, and then all you have to do is make the playoffs in regional pro. Like I dont know what you are so proud of.
Even though we are not competing well thus far, I am proud of the fact we made it this far up (so far).
sorry to break it to you, But every season teams promote, you can go 0-16 and still promote until Regional Pro, and then all you have to do is make the playoffs in regional pro. Like I dont know what you are so proud of.
mwoods07
offline
offline
Originally posted by Hagalaz
I don't see why you have such a fixation with the rhombus. Is this some sort of freudian thing? Did you get raped by a quadrilateral when you were young or something ? -_-
Now, I'm well aware plenty of the people up top don't know how to build and just imitate one another like apes. That's mainly the reason I stick with people who I see are willing to learn and improve, because these people, given time, will end up building flawlessly while others will still build the way they do now and refuse to improve.
It's up to you and every single one of the players of GLB to choose what they want.
Now if you have something against me, stop trying to diss the rhombus and start dissing ME.
(Also, a good suggestion that you won't follow is to check whether or not what I said was more efficient than your way of building, but since you're just another of the sheep, you're all sure of yourself and will ignore this fine opportunity to become a better builder... )
I don't have a problem with you. But I do think that the Rhombus is a BAAD BAAD team. You seem like you have your builds in the proper order so I see no reason why any team you are a major part of wont promote up to WL. Therefore, since your builds are so unique, and are clearly superior...the builds that our teams choose must be far inferior (because they are built exactly the way you say is wrong). So, I can only assume that Rhombus will make WL next season (I mean, I would think only some of the best builds make it there, not all, but a vast majority) and our teams should all drop down. Because clearly having 4 AEQ on all of your dots is WRONG...So, I'm just waiting out the end of the season when all of our 4 AEQ teams drop and your (mostly 3 AEQ except for specific positions) team promotes.
Rhombus is pretty much on level ground with the rest of the teams level wise..I still say D9 wins by 50+...
I don't see why you have such a fixation with the rhombus. Is this some sort of freudian thing? Did you get raped by a quadrilateral when you were young or something ? -_-
Now, I'm well aware plenty of the people up top don't know how to build and just imitate one another like apes. That's mainly the reason I stick with people who I see are willing to learn and improve, because these people, given time, will end up building flawlessly while others will still build the way they do now and refuse to improve.
It's up to you and every single one of the players of GLB to choose what they want.
Now if you have something against me, stop trying to diss the rhombus and start dissing ME.
(Also, a good suggestion that you won't follow is to check whether or not what I said was more efficient than your way of building, but since you're just another of the sheep, you're all sure of yourself and will ignore this fine opportunity to become a better builder... )
I don't have a problem with you. But I do think that the Rhombus is a BAAD BAAD team. You seem like you have your builds in the proper order so I see no reason why any team you are a major part of wont promote up to WL. Therefore, since your builds are so unique, and are clearly superior...the builds that our teams choose must be far inferior (because they are built exactly the way you say is wrong). So, I can only assume that Rhombus will make WL next season (I mean, I would think only some of the best builds make it there, not all, but a vast majority) and our teams should all drop down. Because clearly having 4 AEQ on all of your dots is WRONG...So, I'm just waiting out the end of the season when all of our 4 AEQ teams drop and your (mostly 3 AEQ except for specific positions) team promotes.
Rhombus is pretty much on level ground with the rest of the teams level wise..I still say D9 wins by 50+...
mwoods07
offline
offline
Originally posted by Hagalaz
Hmmm... Trust me, I'm one of the players that doesn't follow cookie cutter builds, but exceptions are that - exceptions... The vast majority of players would be better served by choosing the best path with care, instead of just blindly following what everyone else does.
Heck, some of my players are 4-aeq or are using AEQ in less than ideal scenarios, simply because they have to for their builds. But 4-AEQ is no longer the default, most players would be better built in a different way.
I'm just going on this right here...if your Dot does not have 4 AEQ, in most cases he wont make one of our teams (if we are hurting for a position, we will make exceptions on one of the "non-main teams"). Therefore, our way must be BAD, and none of our teams should be very good...right?
Hmmm... Trust me, I'm one of the players that doesn't follow cookie cutter builds, but exceptions are that - exceptions... The vast majority of players would be better served by choosing the best path with care, instead of just blindly following what everyone else does.
Heck, some of my players are 4-aeq or are using AEQ in less than ideal scenarios, simply because they have to for their builds. But 4-AEQ is no longer the default, most players would be better built in a different way.
I'm just going on this right here...if your Dot does not have 4 AEQ, in most cases he wont make one of our teams (if we are hurting for a position, we will make exceptions on one of the "non-main teams"). Therefore, our way must be BAD, and none of our teams should be very good...right?
Hagalaz
offline
offline
Originally posted by mwoods07
I'm just going on this right here...if your Dot does not have 4 AEQ, in most cases he wont make one of our teams (if we are hurting for a position, we will make exceptions on one of the "non-main teams"). Therefore, our way must be BAD, and none of our teams should be very good...right?
LOL...
And you admit that publicly ?
You're not ashamed to admit you're sabotaging yourself?
*SIGH*
Yes. IF YOU ALWAYS BUILD 4-AEQ IN ALL POSITIONS AND STYLES YOUR WAY OF BUILDING IS CRAP!
Duh.
I'm just going on this right here...if your Dot does not have 4 AEQ, in most cases he wont make one of our teams (if we are hurting for a position, we will make exceptions on one of the "non-main teams"). Therefore, our way must be BAD, and none of our teams should be very good...right?
LOL...
And you admit that publicly ?
You're not ashamed to admit you're sabotaging yourself?*SIGH*
Yes. IF YOU ALWAYS BUILD 4-AEQ IN ALL POSITIONS AND STYLES YOUR WAY OF BUILDING IS CRAP!
Duh.
mwoods07
offline
offline
Originally posted by Hagalaz
LOL...
And you admit that publicly ? You're not ashamed to admit you're sabotaging yourself?
*SIGH*
Yes. IF YOU ALWAYS BUILD 4-AEQ IN ALL POSITIONS AND STYLES YOUR WAY OF BUILDING IS CRAP!
Duh.
I can't agree (sp) more...guess that's why DS is so bad all the time in all the leagues we play in...and why the only DS team here, abiding by our 4 AEQ rule we adhere to, gets to play you later this season and you get to show the world that your performance backs your statements.
LOL...
And you admit that publicly ?
You're not ashamed to admit you're sabotaging yourself?*SIGH*
Yes. IF YOU ALWAYS BUILD 4-AEQ IN ALL POSITIONS AND STYLES YOUR WAY OF BUILDING IS CRAP!
Duh.
I can't agree (sp) more...guess that's why DS is so bad all the time in all the leagues we play in...and why the only DS team here, abiding by our 4 AEQ rule we adhere to, gets to play you later this season and you get to show the world that your performance backs your statements.
Edited by mwoods07 on Feb 11, 2013 18:06:43
Hagalaz
offline
offline
You know, I'm about to give up here, but I'm gonna try one last time...
Do I like have "rhombus" tattooed on my forehead? Do I have a "Kiss me I'm a rhombi" t-shirt? Why do you think I = RHOMBUS?
Are you dense on purpose or just trying to troll me? What does it take to get you to separate me and rhombus as two different identities? Do you think I built all 55 players in the team? Do you think I own the team? Coordinate it? What exactly makes you think I am the team and the team is me ?
Do you have any, ye know, LOGICAL reply to that?
Or maybe I'll do you one better. Would you be interested in PROOF that 3 AEQ > 4 AEQ in most cases ? Would FACTS, UNAMBIGUOUS EVIDENCE get you to shut up with all your arrogance and learn to improve ?
Do I like have "rhombus" tattooed on my forehead? Do I have a "Kiss me I'm a rhombi" t-shirt? Why do you think I = RHOMBUS?
Are you dense on purpose or just trying to troll me? What does it take to get you to separate me and rhombus as two different identities? Do you think I built all 55 players in the team? Do you think I own the team? Coordinate it? What exactly makes you think I am the team and the team is me ?
Do you have any, ye know, LOGICAL reply to that?
Or maybe I'll do you one better. Would you be interested in PROOF that 3 AEQ > 4 AEQ in most cases ? Would FACTS, UNAMBIGUOUS EVIDENCE get you to shut up with all your arrogance and learn to improve ?
mwoods07
offline
offline
Originally posted by Hagalaz
You know, I'm about to give up here, but I'm gonna try one last time...
Do I like have "rhombus" tattooed on my forehead? Do I have a "Kiss me I'm a rhombi" t-shirt? Why do you think I = RHOMBUS?
Are you dense on purpose or just trying to troll me? What does it take to get you to separate me and rhombus as two different identities? Do you think I built all 55 players in the team? Do you think I own the team? Coordinate it? What exactly makes you think I am the team and the team is me ?
Do you have any, ye know, LOGICAL reply to that?
Or maybe I'll do you one better. Would you be interested in PROOF that 3 AEQ > 4 AEQ in most cases ? Would FACTS, UNAMBIGUOUS EVIDENCE get you to shut up with all your arrogance and learn to improve ?
Lets do a few quotes, I don't have time to go through the all:
Originally posted by Hagalaz
T2, I assume you did not take level into account on your batch of analysis. Am I correct?
I assumed you were saying that Rhombus was underleveled and when they got even level with everyone else, they would be good.
Originally posted by Hagalaz
It just irks me to see someone say that team A losing to team B means team A isn't worth it when team A was 6 levels lower than team B... -_-
It's illogical. A level 79 team will beat a level 73 team. If it doesn't, something is wrong there.
This is NOT accurate, as we have had SEVERAL teams make it to the WL before they even reached plateau as a team, so those level 73 dots beat up on a whole lot of level 79 teams...
Originally posted by Hagalaz
It's simply and only about the fact that he gives weight to the result of a game between a full level 79 team and a level 73 team as something definitive. He's ignoring the blatant advantage one of the teams has over the other. It's unacceptable.
EDIT: And EL does matter.
If I read this correctly, you are saying that the only reason the team was ranked low was because they were 73 and lost to 79's. I call B.S. I think the team lost because they have a build advisor who tells them to go with 3 AEQ, and that now that they are level 79, they are still going to get owned by half the teams in the league, losing by 50+ to the top 2-3 teams.
See the problem is you are so narrow minded that you think "my way is the best", when you have ZERO evidence to prove it. What does DS have to prove we know how to build dots? I'd argue plenty, given the number of Pro golds we take each season, and the number of WL golds/silvers under our belts...
Keep building your 3 AEQ dots and keep succeeding in Minors...just stop taking all the new guys down with you and let them learn from teams that have an established winning style.
You know, I'm about to give up here, but I'm gonna try one last time...
Do I like have "rhombus" tattooed on my forehead? Do I have a "Kiss me I'm a rhombi" t-shirt? Why do you think I = RHOMBUS?
Are you dense on purpose or just trying to troll me? What does it take to get you to separate me and rhombus as two different identities? Do you think I built all 55 players in the team? Do you think I own the team? Coordinate it? What exactly makes you think I am the team and the team is me ?
Do you have any, ye know, LOGICAL reply to that?
Or maybe I'll do you one better. Would you be interested in PROOF that 3 AEQ > 4 AEQ in most cases ? Would FACTS, UNAMBIGUOUS EVIDENCE get you to shut up with all your arrogance and learn to improve ?
Lets do a few quotes, I don't have time to go through the all:
Originally posted by Hagalaz
T2, I assume you did not take level into account on your batch of analysis. Am I correct?
I assumed you were saying that Rhombus was underleveled and when they got even level with everyone else, they would be good.
Originally posted by Hagalaz
It just irks me to see someone say that team A losing to team B means team A isn't worth it when team A was 6 levels lower than team B... -_-
It's illogical. A level 79 team will beat a level 73 team. If it doesn't, something is wrong there.
This is NOT accurate, as we have had SEVERAL teams make it to the WL before they even reached plateau as a team, so those level 73 dots beat up on a whole lot of level 79 teams...
Originally posted by Hagalaz
It's simply and only about the fact that he gives weight to the result of a game between a full level 79 team and a level 73 team as something definitive. He's ignoring the blatant advantage one of the teams has over the other. It's unacceptable.
EDIT: And EL does matter.
If I read this correctly, you are saying that the only reason the team was ranked low was because they were 73 and lost to 79's. I call B.S. I think the team lost because they have a build advisor who tells them to go with 3 AEQ, and that now that they are level 79, they are still going to get owned by half the teams in the league, losing by 50+ to the top 2-3 teams.
See the problem is you are so narrow minded that you think "my way is the best", when you have ZERO evidence to prove it. What does DS have to prove we know how to build dots? I'd argue plenty, given the number of Pro golds we take each season, and the number of WL golds/silvers under our belts...
Keep building your 3 AEQ dots and keep succeeding in Minors...just stop taking all the new guys down with you and let them learn from teams that have an established winning style.
Originally posted by mwoods07
Originally posted by Hagalaz
You know, I'm about to give up here, but I'm gonna try one last time...
Do I like have "rhombus" tattooed on my forehead? Do I have a "Kiss me I'm a rhombi" t-shirt? Why do you think I = RHOMBUS?
Are you dense on purpose or just trying to troll me? What does it take to get you to separate me and rhombus as two different identities? Do you think I built all 55 players in the team? Do you think I own the team? Coordinate it? What exactly makes you think I am the team and the team is me ?
Do you have any, ye know, LOGICAL reply to that?
Or maybe I'll do you one better. Would you be interested in PROOF that 3 AEQ > 4 AEQ in most cases ? Would FACTS, UNAMBIGUOUS EVIDENCE get you to shut up with all your arrogance and learn to improve ?
Lets do a few quotes, I don't have time to go through the all:
Originally posted by Hagalaz
T2, I assume you did not take level into account on your batch of analysis. Am I correct?
I assumed you were saying that Rhombus was underleveled and when they got even level with everyone else, they would be good.
Originally posted by Hagalaz
It just irks me to see someone say that team A losing to team B means team A isn't worth it when team A was 6 levels lower than team B... -_-
It's illogical. A level 79 team will beat a level 73 team. If it doesn't, something is wrong there.
This is NOT accurate, as we have had SEVERAL teams make it to the WL before they even reached plateau as a team, so those level 73 dots beat up on a whole lot of level 79 teams...
Originally posted by Hagalaz
It's simply and only about the fact that he gives weight to the result of a game between a full level 79 team and a level 73 team as something definitive. He's ignoring the blatant advantage one of the teams has over the other. It's unacceptable.
EDIT: And EL does matter.
If I read this correctly, you are saying that the only reason the team was ranked low was because they were 73 and lost to 79's. I call B.S. I think the team lost because they have a build advisor who tells them to go with 3 AEQ, and that now that they are level 79, they are still going to get owned by half the teams in the league, losing by 50+ to the top 2-3 teams.
See the problem is you are so narrow minded that you think "my way is the best", when you have ZERO evidence to prove it. What does DS have to prove we know how to build dots? I'd argue plenty, given the number of Pro golds we take each season, and the number of WL golds/silvers under our belts...
Keep building your 3 AEQ dots and keep succeeding in Minors...just stop taking all the new guys down with you and let them learn from teams that have an established winning style.
first I want to say that I am not saying I agree or disagree with what you have said. I just want to add to your example of DS being successful. I think you also have to allow for the coordinating of the teams as well as the builds. DS has some of the best coordinating in the game so that is a huge part of the success of the group that hasn't been mentioned.
Originally posted by Hagalaz
You know, I'm about to give up here, but I'm gonna try one last time...
Do I like have "rhombus" tattooed on my forehead? Do I have a "Kiss me I'm a rhombi" t-shirt? Why do you think I = RHOMBUS?
Are you dense on purpose or just trying to troll me? What does it take to get you to separate me and rhombus as two different identities? Do you think I built all 55 players in the team? Do you think I own the team? Coordinate it? What exactly makes you think I am the team and the team is me ?
Do you have any, ye know, LOGICAL reply to that?
Or maybe I'll do you one better. Would you be interested in PROOF that 3 AEQ > 4 AEQ in most cases ? Would FACTS, UNAMBIGUOUS EVIDENCE get you to shut up with all your arrogance and learn to improve ?
Lets do a few quotes, I don't have time to go through the all:
Originally posted by Hagalaz
T2, I assume you did not take level into account on your batch of analysis. Am I correct?
I assumed you were saying that Rhombus was underleveled and when they got even level with everyone else, they would be good.
Originally posted by Hagalaz
It just irks me to see someone say that team A losing to team B means team A isn't worth it when team A was 6 levels lower than team B... -_-
It's illogical. A level 79 team will beat a level 73 team. If it doesn't, something is wrong there.
This is NOT accurate, as we have had SEVERAL teams make it to the WL before they even reached plateau as a team, so those level 73 dots beat up on a whole lot of level 79 teams...
Originally posted by Hagalaz
It's simply and only about the fact that he gives weight to the result of a game between a full level 79 team and a level 73 team as something definitive. He's ignoring the blatant advantage one of the teams has over the other. It's unacceptable.
EDIT: And EL does matter.
If I read this correctly, you are saying that the only reason the team was ranked low was because they were 73 and lost to 79's. I call B.S. I think the team lost because they have a build advisor who tells them to go with 3 AEQ, and that now that they are level 79, they are still going to get owned by half the teams in the league, losing by 50+ to the top 2-3 teams.
See the problem is you are so narrow minded that you think "my way is the best", when you have ZERO evidence to prove it. What does DS have to prove we know how to build dots? I'd argue plenty, given the number of Pro golds we take each season, and the number of WL golds/silvers under our belts...
Keep building your 3 AEQ dots and keep succeeding in Minors...just stop taking all the new guys down with you and let them learn from teams that have an established winning style.
first I want to say that I am not saying I agree or disagree with what you have said. I just want to add to your example of DS being successful. I think you also have to allow for the coordinating of the teams as well as the builds. DS has some of the best coordinating in the game so that is a huge part of the success of the group that hasn't been mentioned.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
