Warrior General Games

I bet Bort could add in player names to the HoF just by looking at the last game a dot played. Granted people change their dot's name occasionally, but the last name they had would work just fine.

Silly to not include someone because they chose to let the name go.

Originally posted by Mat McBriar
Silly to not include someone because they chose to let the name go.

Meh... just more evidence that that dot has no business being in the hof. If the dot isnt even special enough for the owner to keep the name...

No.48 overall Retired Player
No.58 Retired Player
No.60 Retired Player
ect..........


That guy Retired Player holds a few spots in the HOF,really?

Originally posted by Mat McBriar
I bet Bort could add in player names to the HoF just by looking at the last game a dot played. Granted people change their dot's name occasionally, but the last name they had would work just fine.

Silly to not include someone because they chose to let the name go.

We should ban anyone who is racist against retired players.

Originally posted by beenlurken
Originally posted by Mat McBriar

Silly to not include someone because they chose to let the name go.

Meh... just more evidence that that dot has no business being in the hof. If the dot isnt even special enough for the owner to keep the name...

I rarely keep a name stuck. It's extra clicking that isn't worth my time, lol. Out of the 100 or so players I've retired I probably kept around 5 of their names. And most were early on when I wasn't as efficient.

Are they going to do something about this?

I would also like to see some stats weighed the same.

It appears that SACKS are weighed a TON for all Defensive Positions. Don't get me wrong, sacks are important, but let's be fair for some other positions.

What about the LBers, CB's and Safeties that get the Forced Fumbles, Knock the Ball Loose, Get the Pass Defends and even a lot come down with Interceptions.

You have three LB positions and I know it would be hard to determine LOLB, MLB and ROLB -- but those LBers that play some coverage for PD's/Int's and Force Fumbles shouldn't be kept out of this HOF just because they don't average 10+ sacks a season.

Same thing with the CB's who constantly win the PD/Int trophies or have a low Completion Against percentage. They are doing their job by covering the WR's, but are penalized because they don't have a lot of sacks either.

Added to the OP

Originally posted by Columbus
Are they going to do something about this?

Sure hope so going by the voting

Here's a few suggestions:

Limit the HOF to players who keep their name on retirement.
Limit the HOF to one player per account per sesason (ex: dimmy finster could have only 24 players in the HOF after season 24).
Limit the HOF to players with actual names (ex: Offensive Stop 1 would be ineligible, but someone with a rediculous name like Wideload McGuffin would be eligible).
Limit the HOF to the highest level leagues (Rookie League HOF player? Please!).

Just my 2 cents.

added

Originally posted by lucifer_pdx
Here's a few suggestions:

Limit the HOF to one player per account per sesason (ex: dimmy finster could have only 24 players in the HOF after season 24).
Limit the HOF to players with actual names (ex: Offensive Stop 1 would be ineligible, but someone with a rediculous name like Wideload McGuffin would be eligible).



That just made me retract my vote.

Sad to hear 1's suggestion made you do that

My vote is still hanging out there, until there is a solid suggestion to vote on, I still fail to see what exactly we're voting on. A voting suggestion should have a clear suggestion for the fix, not a mix match of different ideas, some of which I agree with and some of which I don't, so depending on what the clear idea is on what and how to fix, will determine my vote.

I think this needs to be hashed out more, and then a re-vote would be in order.