Originally posted by Mad Cow
yea we won, what did we win
nothing yet...we havent "won" yet...3 games left to go and we are up 13-10.
yea we won, what did we win
nothing yet...we havent "won" yet...3 games left to go and we are up 13-10.
tycoon34
offline
offline
Originally posted by HurricaneBear
awesome job bandar. 7 of 10 of the top 10 games is impressive.
yeah it just shows we're better all around and at the top. All in all we just own EEPL
awesome job bandar. 7 of 10 of the top 10 games is impressive.
yeah it just shows we're better all around and at the top. All in all we just own EEPL
nthomas
offline
offline
Originally posted by HurricaneBear
awesome job bandar. 7 of 10 of the top 10 games is impressive.
It is a league wide challenge. If you extend it to the top 12, it is 7-5, and you can make any arbitrary cutoff you want.
The idea was to compare leagues top to bottom, not just in some arbitrary cutoffs.
awesome job bandar. 7 of 10 of the top 10 games is impressive.
It is a league wide challenge. If you extend it to the top 12, it is 7-5, and you can make any arbitrary cutoff you want.
The idea was to compare leagues top to bottom, not just in some arbitrary cutoffs.
bhall43
offline
offline
Originally posted by nthomas
Originally posted by HurricaneBear
awesome job bandar. 7 of 10 of the top 10 games is impressive.
It is a league wide challenge. If you extend it to the top 12, it is 7-5, and you can make any arbitrary cutoff you want.
The idea was to compare leagues top to bottom, not just in some arbitrary cutoffs.
was it really worth making that point?
survey says....
Originally posted by HurricaneBear
awesome job bandar. 7 of 10 of the top 10 games is impressive.
It is a league wide challenge. If you extend it to the top 12, it is 7-5, and you can make any arbitrary cutoff you want.
The idea was to compare leagues top to bottom, not just in some arbitrary cutoffs.
was it really worth making that point?
survey says....
bhall43
offline
offline
ps sorry if we lose the game guys...im just too drunk to set something up tonight...
Dr. Grandiosity
offline
offline
Originally posted by nthomas
It is a league wide challenge. If you extend it to the top 12, it is 7-5, and you can make any arbitrary cutoff you want.
The idea was to compare leagues top to bottom, not just in some arbitrary cutoffs.
That is very true, 10 just seemed like a good number to pick.
I just made that point because a lot of "GLB rankers" say well congrats SEAPL beat EEPL but who gives a fuck.
"Their bottom of the barrel teams beat EEPL bottom of the barrel teams but the top of EEPL is still > SEAPL"
when in actuality our top 10 went 7-3.
It is a league wide challenge. If you extend it to the top 12, it is 7-5, and you can make any arbitrary cutoff you want.
The idea was to compare leagues top to bottom, not just in some arbitrary cutoffs.
That is very true, 10 just seemed like a good number to pick.
I just made that point because a lot of "GLB rankers" say well congrats SEAPL beat EEPL but who gives a fuck.
"Their bottom of the barrel teams beat EEPL bottom of the barrel teams but the top of EEPL is still > SEAPL"
when in actuality our top 10 went 7-3.
Edited by sirallan on Jul 11, 2009 19:19:20
bhall43
offline
offline
Originally posted by sirallan
Originally posted by nthomas
It is a league wide challenge. If you extend it to the top 12, it is 7-5, and you can make any arbitrary cutoff you want.
The idea was to compare leagues top to bottom, not just in some arbitrary cutoffs.
That is very true, 10 just seemed like a good number to pick.
I just made that point because a lot of "GLB rankers" say well congrats SEAPL beat EEPL but who gives a fuck.
"Their bottom of the barrel teams beat EEPL bottom of the barrel teams but the top of EEPL is still > SEAPL"
when in actuality our top 10 went 7-3.
top 4 is 4-0...thats all that matters to the voters.
Originally posted by nthomas
It is a league wide challenge. If you extend it to the top 12, it is 7-5, and you can make any arbitrary cutoff you want.
The idea was to compare leagues top to bottom, not just in some arbitrary cutoffs.
That is very true, 10 just seemed like a good number to pick.
I just made that point because a lot of "GLB rankers" say well congrats SEAPL beat EEPL but who gives a fuck.
"Their bottom of the barrel teams beat EEPL bottom of the barrel teams but the top of EEPL is still > SEAPL"
when in actuality our top 10 went 7-3.
top 4 is 4-0...thats all that matters to the voters.
Dr. Grandiosity
offline
offline
Originally posted by bhall43
top 4 is 4-0...thats all that matters to the voters.
Actually we were #4 and we lost so 3-1...
but our loss is beside the point
top 4 is 4-0...thats all that matters to the voters.
Actually we were #4 and we lost so 3-1...
but our loss is beside the point
bhall43
offline
offline
Originally posted by sirallan
Originally posted by bhall43
top 4 is 4-0...thats all that matters to the voters.
Actually we were #4 and we lost so 3-1...
but our loss is beside the point
you just got to ruin everything you damn marauders!
Originally posted by bhall43
top 4 is 4-0...thats all that matters to the voters.
Actually we were #4 and we lost so 3-1...
but our loss is beside the point
you just got to ruin everything you damn marauders!
tycoon34
offline
offline
Originally posted by bhall43
Originally posted by sirallan
Originally posted by bhall43
top 4 is 4-0...thats all that matters to the voters.
Actually we were #4 and we lost so 3-1...
but our loss is beside the point
you just got to ruin everything you damn marauders!
Originally posted by sirallan
Originally posted by bhall43
top 4 is 4-0...thats all that matters to the voters.
Actually we were #4 and we lost so 3-1...
but our loss is beside the point
you just got to ruin everything you damn marauders!
tycoon34
offline
offline
Originally posted by tycoon34
Originally posted by bhall43
Originally posted by sirallan
Originally posted by bhall43
top 4 is 4-0...thats all that matters to the voters.
Actually we were #4 and we lost so 3-1...
but our loss is beside the point
you just got to ruin everything you damn marauders!
wait I take this back. Bhall you drunken bastard you fuckers lost
Originally posted by bhall43
Originally posted by sirallan
Originally posted by bhall43
top 4 is 4-0...thats all that matters to the voters.
Actually we were #4 and we lost so 3-1...
but our loss is beside the point
you just got to ruin everything you damn marauders!
wait I take this back. Bhall you drunken bastard you fuckers lost
tycoon34
offline
offline
Originally posted by nthomas
Originally posted by HurricaneBear
awesome job bandar. 7 of 10 of the top 10 games is impressive.
It is a league wide challenge. If you extend it to the top 12, it is 7-5, and you can make any arbitrary cutoff you want.
The idea was to compare leagues top to bottom, not just in some arbitrary cutoffs.
we compare leagues top to bottom we still win.
Originally posted by HurricaneBear
awesome job bandar. 7 of 10 of the top 10 games is impressive.
It is a league wide challenge. If you extend it to the top 12, it is 7-5, and you can make any arbitrary cutoff you want.
The idea was to compare leagues top to bottom, not just in some arbitrary cutoffs.
we compare leagues top to bottom we still win.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
