Warrior General Games

Originally posted by Knick

This is the most important aspect of most Suggestions

Personal glory < Good of the Game

Yep. I actually think nobody should be credited. Most suggestions are modified by the discussion anyway, so they are not all one person.

great idea this MUST be implemented

very nice idea

I like the idea but if the TEs pass blocking and he sees blitzers coming from the opposite side he's going to shift over. Maybe the QB recognizing blitz with his vision could shift the TE over to the side he thinks is going to be blitzed.

great idea

maybe since ther are now new "Custom" depth chart slots for TEs, FBs, and HBs (that may or may not override the basics), this SOLB/WOLB could be used the same way. GMs could set the basic depth chart as ROLB/LOLB, with the Custom slots being strong/weak.

unnecessary...

Originally posted by jdros13
I think this is absolutely necessary if we are going to allow the offense to move the TE around.

+100

This sums it up!

Originally posted by AD_MVP
unnecessary...

YOU are clearly an OC.

i completly agree with the idea. great idea. and i know i havnt been apart of this suggestion yet so don flam me, but being a football player in real life, and seeing your thread befor, i don really understand why the Sam,Will and Mike names are so hard lol Mike = Middle Sam = Strong Will = Weak lol but lets notconfuse any one lol

Originally posted by AD_MVP
unnecessary...

Exactly, it's a worthless idea. Everywhere in the football world, the linebackers have the terminology of "LOLB, MLB, ROLB" in a 4-3 scheme and "LOLB, LILB, RILB, ROLB" in a 3-4 scheme. I swear, is it that hard to see that the LOLB is on the *left* side of your defense? Not only this, it's not hard to make the logical connection that LOLB = defense's left = offense's right.

The more I stay on GLB, the more I realize that the vast majority of people here never played football past pee-wees.

Originally posted by cdcollins
Originally posted by AD_MVP

unnecessary...

Exactly, it's a worthless idea. Everywhere in the football world, the linebackers have the terminology of "LOLB, MLB, ROLB" in a 4-3 scheme and "LOLB, LILB, RILB, ROLB" in a 3-4 scheme. I swear, is it that hard to see that the LOLB is on the *left* side of your defense? Not only this, it's not hard to make the logical connection that LOLB = defense's left = offense's right.

The more I stay on GLB, the more I realize that the vast majority of people here never played football past pee-wees.

You must have never heard of the Sam, Mike, and Will linebackers then.

Originally posted by cdcollins
Originally posted by AD_MVP

unnecessary...

Exactly, it's a worthless idea. Everywhere in the football world, the linebackers have the terminology of "LOLB, MLB, ROLB" in a 4-3 scheme and "LOLB, LILB, RILB, ROLB" in a 3-4 scheme. I swear, is it that hard to see that the LOLB is on the *left* side of your defense? Not only this, it's not hard to make the logical connection that LOLB = defense's left = offense's right.

The more I stay on GLB, the more I realize that the vast majority of people here never played football past pee-wees.

are you a complet moron? i think he knows exactly where the LOLB spot is on defense, unless he is retarded, but what he is saying is that the Will back AKA LOLB, is usually put away from the tightend. well now that the offense has the option to flop the TE to the other side making the LOLB not the Sam LB AKA the Strong OLB, he wants an option so that the ROLB AKA Sam AKA Strong OLB is always placed over top the TE, on the Strong side. we dont care about the names. LOLB=left side we not dumb. u wan se dum i sho dum, but seriously its bout the defensive AI being equal to the offensive AI.