3rd Page, BUMP!
Let's get some resolve on this!
Let's get some resolve on this!
utilikelt
offline
offline
I was interested in this before, and I still am. I need something to keep me interested, after the financial challenges were eliminated
still not dead ... never dead
Originally posted by utilikelt
I was interested in this before, and I still am. I need something to keep me interested, after the financial challenges were eliminated
this seems to be a recurrent theme. I was never a big fan of the financial system, but it's becoming obvious that a lot of people were
Originally posted by utilikelt
I was interested in this before, and I still am. I need something to keep me interested, after the financial challenges were eliminated
this seems to be a recurrent theme. I was never a big fan of the financial system, but it's becoming obvious that a lot of people were
kingjonb
offline
offline
-1
garbage! too easy to exploit especially with 20 man rosters. Just build 2 HB, 1 QB, 1 FB, 1 K, 1 TE, 3 WR, 7 OT, 4 DT all strength based except for HB QB and FB and ST except HB QB and linemen and watch them run over teams.
Only bright side is it would cost less to build a team.
garbage! too easy to exploit especially with 20 man rosters. Just build 2 HB, 1 QB, 1 FB, 1 K, 1 TE, 3 WR, 7 OT, 4 DT all strength based except for HB QB and FB and ST except HB QB and linemen and watch them run over teams.
Only bright side is it would cost less to build a team.
Edited by kingjonb on Oct 28, 2010 10:59:18
Edited by kingjonb on Oct 28, 2010 10:54:55
RIP Al Davis
offline
offline
Originally posted by kingjonb
-1
garbage! too easy to exploit especially with 20 man rosters. Just build 2 HB, 1 QB, 1 FB, 1 K, 1 TE, 3 WR, 7 OT, 4 DT all strength based except for HB QB and FB and watch them run over teams.
Only bright side is it would cost less to build a team.
? Why would that be an exploit and not a strategy?
And if you seriously think players could get away with 200 strength and 20 everything else then lolyou.
-1
garbage! too easy to exploit especially with 20 man rosters. Just build 2 HB, 1 QB, 1 FB, 1 K, 1 TE, 3 WR, 7 OT, 4 DT all strength based except for HB QB and FB and watch them run over teams.
Only bright side is it would cost less to build a team.
? Why would that be an exploit and not a strategy?
And if you seriously think players could get away with 200 strength and 20 everything else then lolyou.
Edited by HALL OF FAMER Al Davis on Oct 28, 2010 11:01:25
kingjonb
offline
offline
Originally posted by HALL OF FAMER Al Davis
? Why would that be an exploit and not a strategy?
And if you seriously think players could get away with 200 strength and 20 everything else then lolyou.
200 strength? I want some, but no you just have to be stronger than the player you're lined up against, and yes strength does have something to do with stamina.
guess the same way non boosting is an exploit, or SSB or rushing QBs
? Why would that be an exploit and not a strategy?
And if you seriously think players could get away with 200 strength and 20 everything else then lolyou.
200 strength? I want some, but no you just have to be stronger than the player you're lined up against, and yes strength does have something to do with stamina.
guess the same way non boosting is an exploit, or SSB or rushing QBs
dansingingfool
offline
offline
Love the idea. 
I believe kingjonb's example would be a strategy, not necessarily exploit. And with every dominant strategy, someone will think of a way to counter it. Plus, if you think it'll be terrible, just don't play Iron Man, stick to regular GLB. I understand how some could not be interested in this, but really how could anybody actually vote against it? Like it's going to change their regular game or something.
I believe kingjonb's example would be a strategy, not necessarily exploit. And with every dominant strategy, someone will think of a way to counter it. Plus, if you think it'll be terrible, just don't play Iron Man, stick to regular GLB. I understand how some could not be interested in this, but really how could anybody actually vote against it? Like it's going to change their regular game or something.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
