Warrior General Games

Originally posted by Time Trial
How many seasons did Bort spend with GLB1 before becoming less active? 10? 20?

In-game, probably around S15 or so.

With the userbase, prolly around S8 or 9. Maybe sooner.

Originally posted by bhall43
Well if you aren't directly arguing my point maybe you shouldn't quote me.

I am directly arguing against your point.. but your argument wasn't arguing against his point apparently.. according to your response to my argument... damn. Now it is so far removed you have sufficiently hidden how stupid you look.

Originally posted by Dub J
In-game, probably around S15 or so.

With the userbase, prolly around S8 or 9. Maybe sooner.

Around when they hired Catch to be his eyes and mouth?

There wasn't reason for Bort to be regularly active with the userbase once Catch got hired. he was hired as the middle man between agents and Bort. Now that he's gone that is a collective operation and you definitely see more admins around the forums answering questions.

Originally posted by bhall43
I'm not sure why you keep squawking nonsense? Does 100 days equal a year to you? Has it been years since things were tested in this game? No.


No.

lmao.. ur right :/changelog:

Originally posted by Time Trial
Around when they hired Catch to be his eyes and mouth?

Yeah, hired a P&R guy that ignored users because he was too busy lurking in PFs slapping people with lengthy bans for shit they posted weeks ago in subforums. Was a great move.

Originally posted by toobad4u_00
I am directly arguing against your point.. but your argument wasn't arguing against his point apparently.. according to your response to my argument... damn. Now it is so far removed you have sufficiently hidden how stupid you look.

His point was that alpha testers made up the glb1 vs glb2 conflict.

My point that was made by people who love glb1, don't want a second football game, and want bort to do more with this game.


Your point is glb2 probably won't be successful.


Good call. Hit the showers.

Here you are arguing the point on the GLB1 forums because we have no inclination to hang out at 2.0.

Originally posted by Dub J
Yeah, hired a P&R guy that ignored users because he was too busy lurking in PFs slapping people with lengthy bans for shit they posted weeks ago in subforums. Was a great move.



To say he ignored users is just another dumb thing coming from you. But since you haven't really played this game competitively in years it only makes sense you are so damn clueless about everything.

Originally posted by bhall43
His point was that alpha testers made up the glb1 vs glb2 conflict.

My point that was made by people who love glb1, don't want a second football game, and want bort to do more with this game.


Your point is glb2 probably won't be successful.


Good call. Hit the showers.

Thank you for proving my point.. thanks. Looking dim.

Originally posted by Dub J
Here you are arguing the point on the GLB1 forums because we have no inclination to hang out at 2.0.

The thread is here so here I argue.

What does 2.0 offer the the longtime classic users..

New graphics? Do you really think we care about graphics

New build process? We've seen a few big changes to the build process here on classic over the years. The 2.0 build process may have some new attributes but with respec and no ALGs you can do whatever

Cost? Yes 2.0 costs more than classic and even classic is overpriced.

Team features? Nothing new and with the casual tactics and same old plays it is nothing to get excited about. The least they could have done was have play action, new plays etc..

Not sure what they were thinking about when looking at the big picture. Appealing to a broader audience and not the hardcore people seems to be the agenda but do they really expect the average person to drop $100+ making a few fantasy GLB2 players

Originally posted by Dub J
Here you are arguing the point on the GLB1 forums because we have no inclination to hang out at 2.0.

You're right, go back to talking about whatever it is you were talking about before anyone with a different idea than yours came along.

Let's see... two threads about support not answering, a post about how vladykins wants a new project that somehow stayed in main, a thread about RNG training, and some bugs and suggestions that won't be addressed.

Do you really want us to just hang out in GD and GLB2? Was this thread that much more fun when it was a bunch of people parroting the same sentiment?

Originally posted by snakes22
What does 2.0 offer the the longtime classic users..

New graphics? Do you really think we care about graphics

New build process? We've seen a few big changes to the build process here on classic over the years. The 2.0 build process may have some new attributes but with respec and no ALGs you can do whatever

Cost? Yes 2.0 costs more than classic and even classic is overpriced.

Team features? Nothing new and with the casual tactics and same old plays it is nothing to get excited about. The least they could have done was have play action, new plays etc..

Not sure what they were thinking about when looking at the big picture. Appealing to a broader audience and not the hardcore people seems to be the agenda but do they really expect the average person to drop $100+ making a few fantasy GLB2 players



Get ready to be corrected by bhall.

Originally posted by Time Trial
You're right, go back to talking about whatever it is you were talking about before anyone with a different idea than yours came along.

Let's see... two threads about support not answering, a post about how vladykins wants a new project that somehow stayed in main, a thread about RNG training, and some bugs and suggestions that won't be addressed.

Do you really want us to just hang out in GD and GLB2? Was this thread that much more fun when it was a bunch of people parroting the same sentiment?

It's pretty much a self-fulfilling prophecy.

"omg! All the trolls! Get rid of the trolls"

GLB bans the fuck out of the majority of posters.

"haha! Look how dead the forums are!"