Warrior General Games

Originally posted by Dub J
I need some assistance ITT. I'm having a hard time understanding the dynamics of this thread, tbh.

Is this a "I'm better than you", "I suck but I'm still better than you", or "there's only one right way to play the game" thread?



It's become more of a don't give bad advice and make terrible arguments thread.

Originally posted by O' HappyCow
look, If DS says they want 4 AEQ dots and they win multiple WL titles with them, then I guess they are doing it right. Who are you to question them? Not only question them, but attack them with your all knowing ignorance. But no proof that what you are doing works any better than what they are doing. They have several WL titles to back up however they want to build a team, You have nothing. and to blame ALG is just silly

The funny thing is he's definitely wrong about DS wanting 4 AEQ dots.

Originally posted by Hagalaz
Of course, but I am not making an absolute statement, that guy was. He said "4 AEQ ALL THE TIME!" and I said "no, wait, you should analyze it on a case-by-case basis". And people are attacking ME for it. It's so ridiculous it makes me want to laugh!

because you are trying to tell the very best people in the game how they should build their dots

if what got them 4(?) titles in the most consistent (only) competitive league at the highest level of the game is working for them and WINNING (it's a game, you play to win) I dont see how it can be considered wrong

Originally posted by Longhornfan1024
It's become more of a don't give bad advice and make terrible arguments thread..

I figured it out. Just another dick swinging jamboree.

nothing to see here lol

I went back through the thread and I have no idea where Hag is getting the "4 AEQ only!" stuff from.

Originally posted by jdbolick

3 AEQ vs. 4 AEQ is highly debatable, which is kind of the point. It's not a situation where someone is making a mathematical error that you can correct with absolute confidence. Look, I'm not saying that you shouldn't be critical or that you need to have tons of WL experience before you're allowed to be, but when you're critical without that background then you're going to take flak for it.

Exactly!

I understand that full well! But would you rather be quiet and let someone say something that could deceive newer players, or would you rather call it to attention?

Originally posted by jdbolick
I went back through the thread and I have no idea where Hag is getting the "4 AEQ only!" stuff from.

Unfortunately, it's something that has spun several forums, so where it started exactly, I dunno. Last iteration was in the forum of some pro league, can't remember which one.

Originally posted by jdbolick
I went back through the thread and I have no idea where Hag is getting the "4 AEQ only!" stuff from.

CPL last season was annoying. You wouldnt shut up about it. btw DS won CPL last season and promoted to the WL the same season you said they were doing it wrong, while your teams are still in Pro.

I'd like to know which DS agent said that.

Originally posted by Longhornfan1024
I'd like to know which DS agent said that.

I dont know how poorly Hag is remembering this, but he was going back and forth with mwoodsand someone else last season in CPL about builds. I dont remember specifics, just that it was silly to argue with DS about how they build dots and how its wrong. I just made a mental note that Hag was an idiot and he has proven it correct everytime he posts.

Originally posted by O' HappyCow
I dont know how poorly Hag is remembering this, but he was going back and forth with mwoodsand someone else last season in CPL about builds. I dont remember specifics, just that it was silly to argue with DS about how they build dots and how its wrong. I just made a mental note that Hag was an idiot and he has proven it correct everytime he posts.

It didn't take me long to figure that out.

Here is our fun discussion of INT% vs. CB% in the Build Advice Forum:

http://goallineblitz.com/game/forum_thread.pl?thread_id=4815022&page=1

Originally posted by Dub J
Just another dick swinging jamboree.

There should be a separate forum for this....

Originally posted by Longhornfan1024
It didn't take me long to figure that out.

Here is our fun discussion of INT% vs. CB% in the Build Advice Forum:

http://goallineblitz.com/game/forum_thread.pl?thread_id=4815022&page=1

Thank you for linking the discussion where you were proven wrong time and time again. Why would you show yourself be proven wrong?

Originally posted by Hagalaz
Thank you for linking the discussion where you were proven wrong time and time again. Why would you show yourself be proven wrong?

Still at it.

Originally posted by Hagalaz
Thank you for linking the discussion where you were proven wrong time and time again. Why would you show yourself be proven wrong?

I'm not in that forum because I'm already a pro dot builder.

Originally posted by Hagalaz
*facepalm*

So, due to something that is 100% mathematical and predictable, people can't "find a sure 100% best training method"?

Get out of here, you have absolutely no idea what you are talking about.

Listen to this fucktard, your ignorance far exceeds your intelligence. Perhaps u should reread what I wrote and try with that pathetic brain of yours to understand what I was actually saying. Without ALGs the way people would train would be even more clone than it currently is, at least as it stands they are the key reason everyone has a little different training program. I also love the irony in your calling me a random, my dots for the most part are all near the VERY top of the WL pecking order. That facepalm u gave was your mother thinking about her mistake