Warrior General Games

Thread delivers!

Originally posted by ron2288
Originally posted by yello1

You think I am being unduly optimistic don't you? Have faith. Someone sooner or later may offer something intellectually interesting.

I just know it will not be you that will be the one to offer anything near intellectually interesting.
Since you seam to be such a simpleton(going by some of your arguments and suggestions.) I though I will give a answer in a very simple form
Someone even tries to make rational point in way something you suggestion is not a good idea you blast them.
I do not think you are being intellectually interesting, I just think you are being down right foolish.
Thanks for proving my point.


Blasts them?

Dude, other than the occasional gag I offer in kind. If someone just flames me, they get flame, if they offer an opinion they will get my opinion, If they offer a reasoned argument they get reasoned argument.

And if they offer a valid point I will even concede it.

But none of that means I feel constrained to tell someone they are right, when they are not.

Originally posted by spartan822
You guys would probably have better luck arguing with a brick wall. History has shown that when yello really believes in one of his misguided suggestions, he won't back down from it no matter how good the arguments against it. So like most yello suggestions, best to not even waste your time and just let this one die.....

Just as you all continue to believe in your misguided objections to my superior suggestions.

yello1 you continue to think your way and the rest of GLB will continue to think their way on this. your only defense to all the points that have been given is that you are only referring to National Pro. yet in another thread you have spoken that all of your suggestions are for the betterment of GLB as a whole. well you have basically proved yourself to bend the truth to try to help your own cause here. there are alot more leagues than National Pro and if your suggestion were implemented by some stupid reasoning. then it wouldn't only affect National Pro it would affect every league.

so if you were telling the truth and your suggestion is to help all of GLB. then your suggestion here has been shot down on multiple levels. now if you were trying to sell a load of bull like I figure you are. then you will come back with yet another argument to try to make people see things your way. and that essentially is you just trying to help yourself and not the whole GLB community.

so what is it going to be:
a.) you drop this defeated suggestion and move onto something else or
b.) you continue to argue and show all of us that this suggestion was made to try to help you and not all of GLB.

Originally posted by hatchman
yello1 you continue to think your way and the rest of GLB will continue to think their way on this. your only defense to all the points that have been given is that you are only referring to National Pro. yet in another thread you have spoken that all of your suggestions are for the betterment of GLB as a whole. well you have basically proved yourself to bend the truth to try to help your own cause here. there are alot more leagues than National Pro and if your suggestion were implemented by some stupid reasoning. then it wouldn't only affect National Pro it would affect every league.

so if you were telling the truth and your suggestion is to help all of GLB. then your suggestion here has been shot down on multiple levels. now if you were trying to sell a load of bull like I figure you are. then you will come back with yet another argument to try to make people see things your way. and that essentially is you just trying to help yourself and not the whole GLB community.

so what is it going to be:
a.) you drop this defeated suggestion and move onto something else or
b.) you continue to argue and show all of us that this suggestion was made to try to help you and not all of GLB.

You logic is flawed once again.

National Pro is the center piece of GLB. Improving Natty Pro IS improving GLB.

There are enough differences between Natty Pro and the rest of the leagues that an improvement might be best for Natty and not necessarily for the Minors, and vice versa.

And where I actually had agreed with you is that some contraction is a good thing if the level of CPUs in a league level is enough to close a whole league (ie Reg Pro #69 etc).

But its not okay for National Pro. The day you start contracting the National Pro leagues is the day you start the timer to GLBs demise.

CPU gaps in the Natty Pro should be filled by adding owners, for example letting the people with a demonstrated desire to buy teams buy them with less restraints. That would be good for ALL of GLB.

So your effort to paint my statements as contradictory is what we in the internet cool set call Phail!!!!

Originally posted by yello1
Originally posted by hatchman

yello1 you continue to think your way and the rest of GLB will continue to think their way on this. your only defense to all the points that have been given is that you are only referring to National Pro. yet in another thread you have spoken that all of your suggestions are for the betterment of GLB as a whole. well you have basically proved yourself to bend the truth to try to help your own cause here. there are alot more leagues than National Pro and if your suggestion were implemented by some stupid reasoning. then it wouldn't only affect National Pro it would affect every league.

so if you were telling the truth and your suggestion is to help all of GLB. then your suggestion here has been shot down on multiple levels. now if you were trying to sell a load of bull like I figure you are. then you will come back with yet another argument to try to make people see things your way. and that essentially is you just trying to help yourself and not the whole GLB community.

so what is it going to be:
a.) you drop this defeated suggestion and move onto something else or
b.) you continue to argue and show all of us that this suggestion was made to try to help you and not all of GLB.

You logic is flawed once again.

National Pro is the center piece of GLB. Improving Natty Pro IS improving GLB.

There are enough differences between Natty Pro and the rest of the leagues that an improvement might be best for Natty and not necessarily for the Minors, and vice versa.

And where I actually had agreed with you is that some contraction is a good thing if the level of CPUs in a league level is enough to close a whole league (ie Reg Pro #69 etc).

But its not okay for National Pro. The day you start contracting the National Pro leagues is the day you start the timer to GLBs demise.

CPU gaps in the Natty Pro should be filled by adding owners, for example letting the people with a demonstrated desire to buy teams buy them with less restraints. That would be good for ALL of GLB.

So your effort to paint my statements as contradictory is what we in the internet cool set call Phail!!!!

they should have killed off one National Pro League when they added WL - there are 9 National Pro and above leagues now - kill off one National Pro league and you are back to the 8 top level leagues that existed before WL

or they could promote out of the regional pro elite leagues until National Pro is filled up

Originally posted by reddogrw
Originally posted by yello1

Originally posted by hatchman


yello1 you continue to think your way and the rest of GLB will continue to think their way on this. your only defense to all the points that have been given is that you are only referring to National Pro. yet in another thread you have spoken that all of your suggestions are for the betterment of GLB as a whole. well you have basically proved yourself to bend the truth to try to help your own cause here. there are alot more leagues than National Pro and if your suggestion were implemented by some stupid reasoning. then it wouldn't only affect National Pro it would affect every league.

so if you were telling the truth and your suggestion is to help all of GLB. then your suggestion here has been shot down on multiple levels. now if you were trying to sell a load of bull like I figure you are. then you will come back with yet another argument to try to make people see things your way. and that essentially is you just trying to help yourself and not the whole GLB community.

so what is it going to be:
a.) you drop this defeated suggestion and move onto something else or
b.) you continue to argue and show all of us that this suggestion was made to try to help you and not all of GLB.

You logic is flawed once again.

National Pro is the center piece of GLB. Improving Natty Pro IS improving GLB.

There are enough differences between Natty Pro and the rest of the leagues that an improvement might be best for Natty and not necessarily for the Minors, and vice versa.

And where I actually had agreed with you is that some contraction is a good thing if the level of CPUs in a league level is enough to close a whole league (ie Reg Pro #69 etc).

But its not okay for National Pro. The day you start contracting the National Pro leagues is the day you start the timer to GLBs demise.

CPU gaps in the Natty Pro should be filled by adding owners, for example letting the people with a demonstrated desire to buy teams buy them with less restraints. That would be good for ALL of GLB.

So your effort to paint my statements as contradictory is what we in the internet cool set call Phail!!!!

they should have killed off one National Pro League when they added WL - there are 9 National Pro and above leagues now - kill off one National Pro league and you are back to the 8 top level leagues that existed before WL

or they could promote out of the regional pro elite leagues until National Pro is filled up

Very good suggestion and one that makes complete sense. unlike yello1's BS

Originally posted by yello1
Blasts them?

Dude, other than the occasional gag I offer in kind. If someone just flames me, they get flame, if they offer an opinion they will get my opinion, If they offer a reasoned argument they get reasoned argument.

And if they offer a valid point I will even concede it.

But none of that means I feel constrained to tell someone they are right, when they are not.



Get off your self righteous BS. You have said people are plain stupid when they disagreed with you and even offered very valid
Do not even try to make your self look like you are the helpless innocence person and say people flame you for no reason .

Really grow up

Originally posted by yello1
Just as you all continue to believe in your misguided objections to my superior suggestions.

then you woke from your dream world

Yello --

I wont come down on you for your shotgun approach to suggestions. Eventually even a blind chick finds a piece of corn.

I will say this -- while you claim that you will listen to others opinions and drop an idea that the community is not in favor of -- I've yet to see you actually do that. Mostly I see you trying to feebly defend a suggestion that the rest of the posts are against. I think you'd have better luck if you let the unpopular suggestions die a natural death, and focus your attentions on the suggestions you've made that folks seem to agree with.

Or you can call me a Luddite.


Peace,

Fish

Originally posted by IdRatherFlyFish
Yello --

I wont come down on you for your shotgun approach to suggestions. Eventually even a blind chick finds a piece of corn.

I will say this -- while you claim that you will listen to others opinions and drop an idea that the community is not in favor of -- I've yet to see you actually do that. Mostly I see you trying to feebly defend a suggestion that the rest of the posts are against. I think you'd have better luck if you let the unpopular suggestions die a natural death, and focus your attentions on the suggestions you've made that folks seem to agree with.

Or you can call me a Luddite.


Peace,

Fish

that is about it....

An example of a yello1 suggestion

Yello1 makes an suggestion(most of the time it is lame)
Someone disagree and shows yello1 where the suggestion has tons of faults
Yello1 then turns to some lame name calling(EX Luddite) And then claims he has an high IQ(which is not the case)



Now once a while yello1 does (as stated above) find a piece of corn. he does make a great suggestion, but he usually truns everyone against him because as soon as everyone +1 it . He then goes on how he done this for the game and says he so smart and on and on and on and on

Shit this whole time I thought that his problem was that he flooded the suggestion forums with so many crappy ideas that the good ones get buried by everyone making fun of him in the crappy ones.

Originally posted by Outlaw Dogs
Shit this whole time I thought that his problem was that he flooded the suggestion forums with so many crappy ideas that the good ones get buried by everyone making fun of him in the crappy ones.

you may have a point

Originally posted by ron2288
Originally posted by yello1

Blasts them?

Dude, other than the occasional gag I offer in kind. If someone just flames me, they get flame, if they offer an opinion they will get my opinion, If they offer a reasoned argument they get reasoned argument.

And if they offer a valid point I will even concede it.

But none of that means I feel constrained to tell someone they are right, when they are not.



Get off your self righteous BS. You have said people are plain stupid when they disagreed with you and even offered very valid
Do not even try to make your self look like you are the helpless innocence person and say people flame you for no reason .

Really grow up






















If I called someone stupid they did far more than just disagree with me, they acted like an idiot in an insulting offensive manner and not as a joke, or at least not obviously so (the internet being limited in conveying humor as it is, I certainly have been bent on occasion over something that was said in jest after all).

This, of course, is not to be confused with my humorous claim to being the intellectual genius of the greater internet community. Thats all about me, not you.

But its very simple. If you don't trash me, I won't trash you. But your ideas better be ready to defend themselves because I am not one to let bad logic lay around uncontested.

Originally posted by reddogrw
Originally posted by yello1

Originally posted by hatchman


yello1 you continue to think your way and the rest of GLB will continue to think their way on this. your only defense to all the points that have been given is that you are only referring to National Pro. yet in another thread you have spoken that all of your suggestions are for the betterment of GLB as a whole. well you have basically proved yourself to bend the truth to try to help your own cause here. there are alot more leagues than National Pro and if your suggestion were implemented by some stupid reasoning. then it wouldn't only affect National Pro it would affect every league.

so if you were telling the truth and your suggestion is to help all of GLB. then your suggestion here has been shot down on multiple levels. now if you were trying to sell a load of bull like I figure you are. then you will come back with yet another argument to try to make people see things your way. and that essentially is you just trying to help yourself and not the whole GLB community.

so what is it going to be:
a.) you drop this defeated suggestion and move onto something else or
b.) you continue to argue and show all of us that this suggestion was made to try to help you and not all of GLB.

You logic is flawed once again.

National Pro is the center piece of GLB. Improving Natty Pro IS improving GLB.

There are enough differences between Natty Pro and the rest of the leagues that an improvement might be best for Natty and not necessarily for the Minors, and vice versa.

And where I actually had agreed with you is that some contraction is a good thing if the level of CPUs in a league level is enough to close a whole league (ie Reg Pro #69 etc).

But its not okay for National Pro. The day you start contracting the National Pro leagues is the day you start the timer to GLBs demise.

CPU gaps in the Natty Pro should be filled by adding owners, for example letting the people with a demonstrated desire to buy teams buy them with less restraints. That would be good for ALL of GLB.

So your effort to paint my statements as contradictory is what we in the internet cool set call Phail!!!!

they should have killed off one National Pro League when they added WL - there are 9 National Pro and above leagues now - kill off one National Pro league and you are back to the 8 top level leagues that existed before WL

or they could promote out of the regional pro elite leagues until National Pro is filled up

There are not enough CPU teams in National Pro to warrant that. No where near the 32 of a whole league.

And IMO National Pro is the primary goal of the game. and that should be as big a community as you can make it, otherwise players may feel it is unattainable and give up on the game.