Warrior General Games

Originally posted by jdbolick
6th in deflections despite being the starter at CB1 : http://goallineblitz.com/game/team_player_stats.pl?team_id=2071&stat=defense&sort=pass_deflections&playoffs=0

Island in the sky - 31 PDs on 62 targets - .500
La Plaga - 26 PDs on 88 targets - .295
Larry McGrew - 22 PDs on 74 targets - .297
Locked Down Like a Boss - 17 PDs on 57 targets - .298
Vinnie Aquaman Chase - 16 PDs on 57 targets - .281
Yes Man XI: Eradication - 16 PDs on 63 targets - .254
Yes Man XII: Ruination - 14 PDs on 57 targets - .246
Paper Champion - 13 PDs on 44 targets - .295
A-Team 1983 GMC G-Series - 13 PDs on 28 targets - .464
Stinky Stink - 13 PDs on 51 targets - .255

OMG LIES!!!




Island in the Sky--FS
La Plaga--.295
Larry McGrew--LB (lol!)
Locked Down--.298
Vinnie--LB
YMXI--16 PDs and 2 INTs on 63 targets - .285
YMXII-- Hard Hitter
Paper--SS
A-Team--Combo CB
Stinky--LB

So you included two safeties and three LBs in your argument about my CB's builds. lol.

Now let's look at the CBs you conveniently failed to include.

Sweet Pants--12 PDs on 57 targets - .210
Ken Houston--8 PD and 1 INT on 52 targets - .173

So not only did you fail to include INTs and decide to include LBs, Safeties, and CBs that are built and used completely differently by the DC, but you chose not to include the two CBs who have a significantly lower ratio.

Like I said, lies.

I'd also like to point out that you had to turn your hard hitter into a blitzer because the build sucks so bad in coverage.

Originally posted by Longhornfan1024
I'd also like to point out that you had to turn your hard hitter into a blitzer because the build sucks so bad in coverage.
That hard hitter had 25 PDs on 80 targets last season for a ratio of .3125, substantially better than either of yours. He also had 8 PDs and no receptions allowed on 12 targets this season. I converted him into a blitzer because that's what I needed. You've been obliterated in this thread and yet your brain is so scared of reality that you will undoubtedly claim and perhaps even believe that you "won."

Originally posted by jdbolick

That hard hitter had 25 PDs on 80 targets last season for a ratio of .3125, substantially better than either of yours. He also had 8 PDs and no receptions allowed on 12 targets this season. I converted him into a blitzer because that's what I needed. You've been obliterated in this thread and yet your brain is so scared of reality that you will undoubtedly claim and perhaps even believe that you "won."

Keep telling yourself that. I've already proven you to be a liar and that your CBs suck. Now go back to pro and see if you can make WL where the big boys play.

And btw last season my pro hard hitter had a .555 ratio. But keep up the lies.

Originally posted by Longhornfan1024
Keep telling yourself that. I've already proven you to be a liar and that your CBs suck.
The sad thing is that I think you actually believe this. Clearly you were deeply damaged as a child to have such a strong inclination toward self-delusion.

Originally posted by jdbolick

The sad thing is that I think you actually believe this. Clearly you were deeply damaged as a child to have such a strong inclination toward self-delusion.

And we're back to you insulting me instead of responding to the facts that I posted. I've proven you to be a liar multiple times in this thread. You ignore the ratio of completions allowed to targets because that doesn't favor you. So you go to PD to targets ratio. But in doing so you ignore INTs, compare my CBs to other positions and different archetypes that are used completely differently than man CBs, and choose not to include the other man CBs that mine did better than. Then you claim that your pro level hard hitter did better than my pro level hard hitter even though yours did much worse. You try to manipulate the facts in your favor or just flat out lie, and I've called you on it multiple times in this thread.

To be honest, though, I'm not even sure why I'm wasting time comparing my CBs to yours. I should really be comparing them to actual good CBs that have success in WL. jd, you make good pro level CBs, but they aren't WL material. Mine are WL material, so I'll continue to compare them to WL CBs.

Originally posted by jdbolick

Clearly he gave up that completion because of a bad build and not terrible code, and nice job neglecting to mention that my corners only gave up three completions in that game. It's also clear that your much slower CB would have chased down the WR and made the tackle.

Not even sure why I'm even here or why I read the past few pages on this, but I have to comment here. Blaming the "terrible" code for that completion is a joke. Your CB has too much speed (for that play - overall can be debated) without enough agility/vision to cover that route.

I'm not going to get into an argument that your CBs are better than LH's because they are both obviously better than mine, but blaming the sim on that play is a joke.

Originally posted by Longhornfan1024
And we're back to you insulting me instead of responding to the facts that I posted.
You didn't post any facts. You claimed that I lied about the numbers when I proved that I didn't. You're a sad person who can't admit when you're wrong, can't acknowledge that your builds aren't very good, and can't accept that your corners had subpar seasons.

Originally posted by
So you go to PD to targets ratio.
Because PDs are something that your corner actually did, as opposed to the QB making a bad throw or Bort's code causing a bad lead. Not including interceptions isn't a "lie," it's just a result of wanting a simple comparison. You're really looking incredibly pathetic by continuing to claim that I've "lied."

Originally posted by
Mine are WL material, so I'll continue to compare them to WL CBs.
You're a starting CB1 and yet you were 6th on your team in deflections. Your EL is also well below average for WL CBs. Those are facts, but you call them lies because you are a deeply disturbed individual who can't face reality.




Originally posted by Eamz~Cult~
Not even sure why I'm even here or why I read the past few pages on this, but I have to comment here. Blaming the "terrible" code for that completion is a joke. Your CB has too much speed (for that play - overall can be debated) without enough agility/vision to cover that route. I'm not going to get into an argument that your CBs are better than LH's because they are both obviously better than mine, but blaming the sim on that play is a joke.
When you post without having a clue what you're talking about, you end up looking ridiculous. WL vets have been complaining all season about how Bort has coded the coverage cushion. It has nothing to do with "too much speed."

Originally posted by jdbolick

You didn't post any facts. You claimed that I lied about the numbers when I proved that I didn't. You're a sad person who can't admit when you're wrong, can't acknowledge that your builds aren't very good, and can't accept that your corners had subpar seasons.

So when you post numbers that are distorted, those are facts, but when I post numbers that are no longer distorted and actually put into context those are no longer facts? Got it. You distorted the numbers, tried to use them out of context, and flat out lied. You still haven't responded to the numbers I posted, and we all know that's because you can't.

Originally posted by jdbolick

Because PDs are something that your corner actually did, as opposed to the QB making a bad throw or Bort's code causing a bad lead. Not including interceptions isn't a "lie," it's just a result of wanting a simple comparison. You're really looking incredibly pathetic by continuing to claim that I've "lied."

Your justification for using PDs over completion allowed % is because "PDs are something that your corner actually did." INTs are also something that corners actually do. Refusing to use INTs when comparing CBs is another attempt by you at distorting the numbers in your favor, not an attempt at simplicity.

Originally posted by jdbolick

You're a starting CB1 and yet you were 6th on your team in deflections. Your EL is also well below average for WL CBs. Those are facts, but you call them lies because you are a deeply disturbed individual who can't face reality.

He was also one of the top CB's in completion allowed %, one of the top in deflections + INTs, had the most forced turnovers, and had the second least number of missed tackles. But let's ignore all those facts because they won't help you in your arguments. I mean, missed tackles, turnovers, and completions allowed don't have any bearing on how good of a build a CB has. Keep trying to distort the truth.

Originally posted by jdbolick

When you post without having a clue what you're talking about, you end up looking ridiculous. WL vets have been complaining all season about how Bort has coded the coverage cushion. It has nothing to do with "too much speed."

Sorry, I didn't realize you had any dots in the WL this season....

Originally posted by Eamz~Cult~
Sorry, I didn't realize you had any dots in the WL this season....

oh snap

Originally posted by jdbolick



I'm guessing you're covering your face because you're embarrassed at how badly he burned you.

Originally posted by Longhornfan1024
I'm guessing you're covering your face because you're embarrassed at how badly he burned you.
Actually because he again posted without having a clue what he was talking about, and again looked ridiculous as a result.