+1
10 pages!
10 pages!
Edited by Aaron Rodgers on May 22, 2011 08:53:18
Jordan Love
offline
offline
DTRAIN
offline
offline
Originally posted by shane695
+1 cant see why its not already available
must have to do with idiot OP. this was suggested in DECEMBER. is it personal or what?
as a Co i can:
set tics at 1¢.
cut a bunch of players if i want (incl my boss').
f' up the AI.
use up all the donated flex on scrims against teams that will kick our ass.
f' up scouting.
clean the team bank with expensive promos.
offer dweeb builds max to replace the top players i cut.
publish/sell team AIs.
BUT CANT ADD A GM? how stupid is that? just too dangerous huh bort.
+1 cant see why its not already available
must have to do with idiot OP. this was suggested in DECEMBER. is it personal or what?
as a Co i can:
set tics at 1¢.
cut a bunch of players if i want (incl my boss').
f' up the AI.
use up all the donated flex on scrims against teams that will kick our ass.
f' up scouting.
clean the team bank with expensive promos.
offer dweeb builds max to replace the top players i cut.
publish/sell team AIs.
BUT CANT ADD A GM? how stupid is that? just too dangerous huh bort.
. Ninja
offline
offline
We are getting closer and closer to team's being majority share holders like real life professional teams.
1st the send/accept scrims (good idea)
Now GM adds/cuts (good idea)
Next suggestion is allow co-owner to pay for 50% of team per season.
I guess with the idea of allowing a co-owner(s) to be an actual owner would lessen the amount of abandonment teams mid season? Sorry, tangent.
+1
1st the send/accept scrims (good idea)
Now GM adds/cuts (good idea)
Next suggestion is allow co-owner to pay for 50% of team per season.
I guess with the idea of allowing a co-owner(s) to be an actual owner would lessen the amount of abandonment teams mid season? Sorry, tangent.
+1
CDZYO
offline
offline
If I didn't already, +1. Co-own is co-own, and sometimes you need an extra body to coordinate the coordinators.
+1 Why have the powers that be not even commented on this yet...let alone post for a vote?
Originally posted by Peacesells
+1 Why have the powers that be not even commented on this yet...let alone post for a vote?
it is up for vote..
+1 Why have the powers that be not even commented on this yet...let alone post for a vote?
it is up for vote..
Originally posted by JcWildcat
it is up for vote..
Hmm...I don't see it. All I see is the allow accept and send scrim requests. The first post here is much grander than that. Allow co-owners the possibility to have all the privileges an owner has but allow the owner to select which ones the co-owner has.
it is up for vote..
Hmm...I don't see it. All I see is the allow accept and send scrim requests. The first post here is much grander than that. Allow co-owners the possibility to have all the privileges an owner has but allow the owner to select which ones the co-owner has.
It's further down the list for vote, had to scroll quite a ways but did see it there 
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
